The ancient Celts and Vikings were Black people.
The Celts were originally Black people. Ephorus (c. 405BC) claimed that the Celts were Blacks or Ethiopians(1)The Celts continued to be recognized as Blacks by Tacitus, who wrote about the Black Celts and Picts in 80 AD .(2)
The Celts on the mainland of Europe were called Iberians or Silures.(3)though the original Celts were Black, overtime their name was stolen by Europeans. Father O’Growney has discussed the history of the Celts. He makes it clear that the original Celts were the Iberians.(4)
The Iberians were probably conquered by the Ligurians.(5) It is suggested that the Ligurians may be represented by the modern Basque of Spain.(6) The Ligurians took the name Celt.
The Ligurians/Celts were conquered by the Gaulish speaking people. The Gauls conqered the Ligurians and pushed them into Spain. It was these Gauls who imposed their language on the Iberian and Ligurian Celts .
The Gauls were Belgians according to Father O’Growney. The Irish and Welsh are descendants of these Gauls.(7) These Gauls spoke Gaulish or Gaelic.(8)
The Germans conquered the Gaulish-Celts, and Gaulish disappeared around 4th Century AD.
All of the Black Celts in Britain were not erased by the Gauls.
This is supported by the Ivory Lady of York ,England. The reconstruction of the face of the Ivory Bangle Lady (c.350AD) indicates that she was African or Black.
This woman was rich and indicates the African type common to the Bristish Isles.She was highly respected by her white subjects.
There is genetic and linguistic evidence that proves that the Celts were Black or African people. An examination of the language spoke by the Basque has a Niger-Congo substratum. C.J.K. Cambell-Dunn has found a Niger-Congo substratum in Basque .(9)
Dr. Cambell-Dunn found that the Niger-Congo and Basque languages share personal pronouns, numerals and vocabulary items.
There is also genetic evidence linking the Basque and Niger-Congo speakers. Both groups share SRY10831.1, YAP, M2,M173(xR1a,R1b3), E3*-P2, E3b2-M81 . (10)This linguistic and genetic evidence supports the African origin of the Celts.
The original Danes or Vikings were Blacks . (11)This is made clear in the Oseberg 8th Century Vikings on the Norway Sledge carving of the Black seafarers that populated the region at this time. It is clear from this carving that the 8th Century Vikings were different from the Blond, big bodied folk of Viking legends.
References:
1. William and Robert Chambers, Chambers Information for the people, Vol. 2 ,(London & Ediburgh,1884) p.66.
2 J.A. Rogers, Sex and race, Vol.1 (New York, 1967) p.196.
3. Ibid, p.196.
4. Father O’Growney, The Celts, American Ecclesiastical Review, (1901) pp.350359.
5. Ibid, p.352.
6. Ibid., p.353.
7. Ibid., p.352.
8. Ibid., p.353.
9. C.J.K. Cambell-Dunn, Basque as Niger Congo. Retrieved 8/28/2010 at http://home.clear.net.nz/page/gc_dunn/Basque_as_Niger-Congo.html
10. Alonso S, Flores C, Cabera V. The place of Basque in the European y-Chromosome diversity landscape, European Journal of Human Genetics, (2005) 13:pp.1293-1302.
11. W.B., The Doctrine of Celtism, Notes and Queries, (1871) 7: p.8.
Here are more sources via Google Book:
Black celts
The Europeans make it clear that the early Welsh were Black Celts. They were a small black race that came to Britain from Iberia. They were forced off the mainland by whites.
T.R. (1890). The Gael at Bala. Bye-Gones, 26 Feb, pp.320-321. Black Celts
Dr. Masson reported on the Highlanders of Canada. He said they were of the descendants Black Celts. Dr, Masson made it clear these Highlanders spoke Caelic and had African faces. Black Celts 2
Dr. Masson. (1875). “The Gael of the Far West”, The Academy, Oct.30, pg.451. Black Celts 3
William Chamers , in Information for the people, said the Celts were descendants of Blacks who mixed with invading white tribes.Chambers said these Celts were Northern Ethiopians. Black Celts 4
Europeans also make it clear that the Danes were Blacks.
Why is there no date for when the Iberians were supposedly there?
So if all the early white europeans were infact black, then where have all the white people come from? Maybe Africa
LOLLLLLLLLLLL!!! Nice theories Mr. Winters-and DEAD wrong yet again….
Joel 🙂 your comment is the first sensible thought I have seen on this sight
The Basque nor Celts were “black” Africans. This is a lie perpetuated by a racist negrocentric [Clyde Winters] who can’t seem to find anything worthy or notable in his hometown of Sub Sahara and has become obsessed with non-African cultures because of it.
Winters deliberately types out text in bold to imply that this is an actual quote taken from a genetics paper. IT IS NOT, but an act of deception and intentional misleading for propaganda purposes. Winters bold text (from above) states:
“There is also genetic evidence linking the Basque and Niger-Congo speakers. Both groups share SRY10831.1, YAP, M2,M173(xR1a,R1b3), E3*-P2, E3b2-M81 . (10)This linguistic and genetic evidence supports the African origin of the Celts.”
If we refer to Winters source “(10)” we find the above quote in absentia. In fact, the words “Niger-Congo” do not even exist in the paper, it is an invention of Winters imagination. Here, Winters is exposed as a liar and it’s unfortunate that his ignorant flock of sheep do not take it upon themselves to investigate Winters fallacious claims. The ignorance of his followers is what Winters banks on.
The actual study “(10)” states:
“The existence of a minor NW African male component (1.2%) in Basques is confirmed by the presence of the African lineages E3*-P2 and E3b2-M81.”
The NW African male component is stated as being BERBER – a Caucasoid people who have inhabited North Africa for millennia, long before the introduction of black slaves to the region by Arabs – yet Winters deliberately – or ignorantly – takes this to mean they were “blacks”. Not one single geneticist or anthropologist makes such laughable claims as Celts and Basque peoples cluster with Europeans, not Sub Sub Saharans. Winters is neither and therefore has no authority to discuss the subject.
The only ydna “black” African haplogroups are A and B and neither one took their exit out of Africa during the “OOA” migrations. The entire premise of an imaginary “black” African worldwide presence is effectively killed off:
“non-African backflow in the Y locus includes E and could ultimately massively outnumber the original African Y throughout Africa, ranging from 59 per cent (rather higher than mtDNA figures cited above) in East Africa and 65–80% in South Africa, to well over 90 per cent in West Africa.” (Oppenheimer; 2012)
“Neandertal genomic traces do not mark a division between African and non-Africans but rather a division between Sub-Saharan Africans and the rest of modern human groups, including those from North Africa… We found that North African populations have a significant excess of derived alleles shared with Neandertals, when compared to sub-Saharan Africans. This excess is similar to that found in non-African humans, a fact that can be interpreted as a sign of Neandertal admixture. Furthermore, the Neandertal’s genetic signal is higher in populations with a local, pre-Neolithic North African ancestry. …”
(Sánchez-Quinto et al; 2012)
oh HONESTLY, this is the most ridiculously racist piece of rubbish i have ever read. accept it, morons: white people exist, we have native homelands, we have every right to pride in our race as do you; and if you don’t like it – go back to where you came from!
Always fast to say “go back where you came from”.. The only people where they’re not supposed to be are Neanderthals. Maybe the arabs.. well no, most of them are where they should be as well.
J.A.Rogers wrote on this and once on an US newscast it was mentioned that the Basque
language had relations with certain African languages, so why does this research rile up up certain readers??????? As for stealing history from “white folks”,thats highly redundant
& insane of certain replies on this article!!!!!!!!