Ancient African Kings Of India
By
Dr. Clyde Winters
Ethiopians have had very intimate relations with Indians. In fact, in antiquity the Ethiopians ruled much of India. These Ethiopians were called the Naga. It was the Naga who created Sanskrit.
A reading of ancient Dravidian literature which dates back to 500 BC, gives us considerable information on the Naga. In Indian tradition the Naga won central India from the Villavar (bowmen) and Minavar (fishermen).
The Naga were great seamen who ruled much of India, Sri Lanka and Burma. To the Aryans they described as half man and snake. The Tamil knew them as warlike people who used the bow and noose.
The earliest mention of the Naga, appear in the Ramayana , they are also mentioned in the Mahabharata. In the Mahabharata we discover that the
Naga had the capital city in the Dekkan, and other cities spread between the Jumna and Ganges as early as 1300 BC. The Dravidian classic, the Chilappathikaran made it clear that the first great kingdom of India was
Naganadu.
The Naga probably came from Kush-Punt/Ethiopia. The Puntites were the greatest sailors of the ancient world. In the Egyptian inscriptions there is mention of the Puntite ports of Outculit, Hamesu and Tekaru, which corresponds to Adulis, Hamasen and Tigre.
In Sumerian text, it is claimed that the Puntites traded with the people of the Indus Valley or Dilmun. According to S.N. Kramer in The Sumerians, part of Punt was probably called Meluhha, and Dilmun was probably the ancient name of the Indus Valley. (Today some scholars maintain that Oman, where we find no ancient cities was Dilmun and the Indus Valley may have been Meluhha).
Ancient Ethiopian traditions support the rule of Puntites or Ethiopians of India. In the Kebra Nagast, we find mention of the Arwe kings who ruled India. The founder of the dynasty was Za Besi Angabo. This dynasty according to the Kebra Nagast began around 1370 BC. These rulers of India and Ethiopia were called Nagas. The Kebra Nagast claims that ” Queen Makeda “had servants and merchants; they traded for her at sea and on land in the Indies and Aswan”. It also says that her son Ebna Hakim or Menelik I, made a campaign in the Indian Sea; the king of India made gifts and donations and prostrated himself before him”. It is also said that Menalik ruled an empire that extended from the rivers of Egypt (Blue Nile) to the west and from the south Shoa to eastern India”, according to the Kebra
Nagast. The Kebra Nagast identification of an eastern Indian empre ruled by
the Naga, corresponds to the Naga colonies in the Dekkan, and on the East
coast between the Kaviri and Vaigai rivers.
The presence of Meluhhaites/ Puntites in India may expain the Greek tradition of Kusites ruling India up to the Ganges. It would also explain the Aryan traditions of Mlechchas ( Sanskrit name for some of the non-Aryan people) as one of the aboriginal groups of India. Many scholars associate the name Mlechchas with Meluhha.
The major Naga tribes were the Maravar, Eyinar, Oliyar, Oviyar, Aru-Valur and Parathavar. The Nagas resisted the invansion of the Cholas. In the Kalittokai IV,1-5, the Naga are described as being “of strong limbs and hardy frames and fierce looking tigers wearing long and curled locks of hair.” The Naga kings of Sri Lanka are mentioned in the: Mahawanso, and are said to have later become Dravidians, as testified to by the names of these people: Naganathan, Nagaratnam, Nagaraja and etc.
The major gift of the Naga to India was the writing system: Nagari. Nagari is the name for the Sanskrit script. Over a hundred years ago Sir William Jones, pointed out that the ancient Ethiopic and Sanskrit writing are one and the same.
William Jones, explained that the Ethiopian origin of Sanskrit was supported by the fact that both writing systems the writing went from left to right and the vowels
were annexed to the consonants. Today Eurocentric scholars teach that Indians taught writing to the Ethiopians, yet the name Nagari for Sanskrit betrays the Ethiopia origin of this form of writing. Moreover, it is interesting to note that Sanskrit vowels: a,aa,’,I,u,e,o, virama etc., are in the same order as Geez.
The Ethiopian script has influenced many other writing systems. Y.M. Kobishnor, in the Unesco History of Africa, maintains that Ethiopic was used as the model for Armenian writing, as was many of the Transcaucasian scripts. Dravidian literature indicate that the Naga may have introduced worship of Kali, the Serpent, Murugan and the Sun or Krishna. It is interesting to note that a god called Murugan is worshipped by many people in East Africa.
It is interesting that Krishna, who was associated with the Sun, means Black, this is analogous to the meaning of Khons of the Kushites. Homer, described Hercules as follows: “Black he stood as night his bow uncased, his arrow string for flight”. This mention of arrows identifies the Kushites as warriors who
used the bow, a common weapon of the Kushites and the Naga.
Â
Kumarinadu
The Naga or Ethiopians were defeated by Dravidian speaking people from Kumarinadu. Kamarinadu is suppose to have formerly existed as a large Island in the India ocean which connected India with East Africa. This landmass is mentioned in the Silappadikaram, which said that Kamarinadu was made up of seven nadus or regions. The Dravidian scholars Adiyarkunallar and Nachinaar wrote about the ancient principalities of Tamilaham, which existed on Kamarinadu.
Kumarinadu was ruled by the Pandyans/Pandians at Madurai before it
sunk beneath the sea. The greatest king of Kumarinadu was Sengoon.
According to Dravidian scholars the Pandyans worshipped the goddess Kumari Amman. This Amman, probably corresponds to the ancient god Amon of the Kushites.
The Kalittokai 104, makes it clear that after the Pandyans were forced to migrate off their Island home into South India, “to compensate for the area lost to the great waves of the sea, King Pandia without tiresome moved to the other countries and won them. Removing the emblems of tiger (Cholas) and bow (Cheras) he, in their place inscribed his reputed emblem fish (Pandia’s) and valiantly made his enemies bow to him”.
Â
Though it is interesting that Nagas are associated with Mount SUmeru (or Mount Meru, su meaning excellent), and of course I’ve communicated with Clyde about SHU being the oldest linguistic philological archetype for conveying “Truth”, as well as the origin of the Sacrificial King Cult of Heracles (Glory of black Hera). Whether the Egytpian deity Shu, or Zulu (sky or heaven), the Sulu Sea in Southeast Asia, or the various cognate words for SHU in Swahili (which match both breath, meditation, perception, orgasm and sewing) (Sutra SKT SIV to sew).
And what does SHU mean in Chinese?
SHU means Dragon.
Thus is the Sutra of Shu, and why Akhenaten had both Nubians in his family as well as SUrya worshipping Mitanni).
Did y’all know that the supposed monotheistic Akhenaten thought of himself as an incarnation of SHU and his wife TEFNUT. SHU and SHAKTI.
– Bill
Om Mani Peme Hung
(P.S. Zeus was a Zulu)
Nevertheless, in support of Clyde Winters, there is a connection between River/Coastal Cultures of India and Africa.
And for Rastafarian’s one of the companions of Thoth (tounge of Ra) was Sheshat…
http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g233/mogrhod/seshat1.jpg
Who had the seven leaf above her head.
And the Rishis and Shivites and Swamis occassionaly smoke Ganja before reading scriptures, not just at festivals, though not all of them.
I don’t know too much about Ethiopian history, or it’s link with the smoking of Ganja with Jamacain Rastafari, but my belief is that if anyone meditates long enough outside and reads scripture (with or without aid of ganja) they’ll soon realize the wisdom of growing matted un-captilized hair, or shave it off completely (like Buddhists/Krishnas & Egyptian Priests).
http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g233/mogrhod/3944.jpg
Also in support of the defence of original African/Tamil/Dravidian wisdom, there is a crazy white guy in Sri Lanka who found the Lingam of Ravana and restored it to a temple.
http://www.kataragama.org/sivakalki.htm
He is also a defender of Murugan and usage of Kansa (Ganja).
http://www.kataragama.org/curse_sivakalki.htm
In support of the reality of the global African presence, In truth…
Om Mani Peme Hung
OM Kali Baaba, you are attacking Vinay but I think you should perhaps do some unbiased research yourself. There is a myth bieng promoted that Shivaism is a native religion of Dravidians and the rest is not. I am assuming that you are one that subsribes to this belief.
There is absolutely no ividence that there was an Aryan Invasion. However, there were a series of migrations from Aryans as well as Arabs and Greeks. Aryans only added certain elemnet to Hinduism, they did not create it nor invent it. It has been a largely proven fact that the religion of Hinduism is majority of African inspiration with an Aryan dominance. All of the Gods and Goddess’s such as Kali, Durga, Shiva, Vishnu,Krishna, Ganesh were all indeginous as clear evidence shows them all in ancient sculptures with African features. Perhaps you should read African Presence in early Asia by Mr. Rashidi and the book Dravidian India.
I do not know much about the Ramayana but Mahabharata and Gita were NOT based off Aryan-Non-Aryan war. Please do your research. The Mahabharata has been rewritten with changes made to it. It was originally written in Prakrit. The Pandavas and Lord Krishna (Black saviour God) were the saviours of the Black race. Krishna tried to show respect and love towards all but he clearly was a warrior and saviour of Blacks. The Gita is a gospel given by Lord Krishna that covers various topics in Yoga.
Hinduism is practiced differently from place to place and varies from village all the way down to individuals. Hinduism is rather amorphous. The Northern Hindus portray the Gods and traditions with more Aryan influence and the south with more non aryan influence.
The varna system and it’s role in society is rather complex. However, it has been a well contested fact that pre aryan civilization had a social order in which the Aryans only took over.
Hinduism has existed since time immemorial. The Aryans only added elements to it but majority of it remains untouched and of indeginous origin.
Praise the Gita.
To be perfectly honest, although I am quite unfamiliar of the topic of this article reading the previous posts did not surprise me. One person says something that is stereotypical of modern society while someone else bashes modern society and opposes it. When will people have a civilized informed conversation as opposed to attacking one another?
this article is showing how people are able to have different thoughts about the same thing. but at the same time have some of the same ideas and oppose other ideas some one has.
All of these articles on Ethiopia have really made me realize that we are not giving Ethiopians enough credit for developing civilization. They have had a lot of important contributions, such as creating Sanskrit, which they are not recognized for.
I had no idea that Ethiopians had any ties to India. It is to no surprise that the Ethiopians created sanskrit, but the Indians are the ones who are given credit for it!