BLACK LIKE THE FIRST EUROPEANS
The first people of Europe were prehistoric Africans. They lived mostly in the southern parts of Europe, and created many paintings and cave art throughout the region.
Pretentious scholars struggling with their self-inflicted racist diseases attach ill-fitting names to the first peoples of Europe. They call them funny names like Neanderthals, Paleolithic men, Mesolithic or Neolithic, Cro-Magnons, Grimaldi, Aurignicians, in a desperate bid to hide the cultural and historical identity of those people.
It is generally conceded by those scholars however, that the African people were the bearers of the first substantive elements of culture into the European continent.
Many thousands of years before the rise of the current pale tribes of Europe, an Afrocoid people known as the Grimaldi people, established the Aurignacian cultures. These people were anatomically modern human beings of the West African typology. They brought the first indications of cultural thoughts and rites into Europe.
The Grimaldi were Black Africans with very little body hair, black and smooth skin; they had the facial features typical of West African forest dwellers. They had kinky hair too. They arrived in Europe 40,000 to 50,000 years ago.
They ranged in height from tall to medium. Their culture had developed in Africa tens of thousands of years before they moved to Europe. It was called the Arugnician Culture. In 1994, scientists found corroborating evidence of stone and bone tools on the banks of the Semlike River in Zaire. They were finely crafted tools made between 75,000 to 100,000 years old long before modern humans migrated to Europe.
The Neanderthals non-modern human specie of man had left Africa early in time (80,000 years ago) and settled in central and southern Europe. It is speculated by bio-anthropologists that the genes of those Neanderthals are extensively sown in the modern European tribes of today.
The “Cro-Magnon,” people, late contemporaries and perhaps descendants of the Grimaldi people also existed in Central and Southern Europe many thousands of years after the Grimaldi Negroid had expanded to Europe but before the appearance of the pale version of Europe now known as Caucasians.
Actually, Caucasians as a race did not appear in Europe until about twenty to thirty thousand years after the arrival of the first Africans who by this very fact are the aboriginals of Europe.
WHENCE COMETH THE PALE ONE
There are many theories which seek to explain the reason for the switch in skin color of the Europeans. The theories proposed range from the Ice-Age effect theory, to those of miscegenation and others that suggest malnutrition. In all these theories lies the admission that the pale skin is a relatively recent genetic modification that occurred in originally Black Europe.
One of the more interesting propositions suggest that the change from black to pale Europe occurred as a result of miscegenation between the modern Africans arrivals in Europe and the primordial Neanderthal which had originally come from Africa. It should be noted that the primordial human Neanderthal (physiologically and intellectually) said to be among the ancestors of Europeans and Caucasians, also came from Africa to Europe about 80,000 years ago. Thus, the Neanderthal, which had apparently been forced to Eurpe from out of Africa, was also of the African genotype.
Some theories suggest that Neanderthals (who were originally black as all original Africans) later became pale-skinned and retained excessive body hair due to genetic selection responding to the need to adapt to the cold and darkness of Ice-Age Europe.
The modern day Europeans are the products of interbreeding between these mutated pale skin Neanderthals (i.e. mutated non modern-human Africa) and the later arriving modern black Africans of 40,000 -10,000 years ago i.e. the Grimaldis.
Warm blooded animals undergo de-pigmentation in the absence of light and warmth. If there were no Ice Age in Europe, the people would have remained Negroid/Black. Some of the darkest Africoid peoples still exist as the Australian Aborigines and Tasmanians. Their ancestors left Africa in the same waves as the Africans that went to Europe. It appears that of the anatomically modern human Africans who had migrated around the globe, those in the warmer southern climates retained their African pigmentation and those in the Northern climates lost theirs as a result of miscegenation with the pale skinned Neanderthals, who it should not be forgotten were originally of the African continent.
Ogu Eji Ofor Annu,
April 1, 2006
Everything taken by Western culture and hidden in the dark shall come to light. Those that deny Africa/blackness at the head of all things shall bow on their knees when all truths are revealed. Response not to those that consider themselves skeptic and take their time on this board to spew ignorances, for they are influenced by the arrogance and greed of the west and the desire to want everything, including stolen history. Lust and greed shall gain no reward.
I have a fairly high degree of E3b1 lines in my genealogy. About 1/16th total and am proud to be of African as well as Amerindian, West Asian and Caucasian descent. From my study, it seems to be clear that the majority of matrilineage for the E3b family outside of Africa is from the J Haplogroup. In North West Africa it is from the U6a. Pesent day East Africans are typically in the L mtdna with some J among others. My questions is this: for those E3b pioneers who ventured out of Africa into the Middle East and Europe so long ago, what was the matrilineage of those males as it was subsequently lost to history with thier Semitic admixture along the maternal lines? Was it from the L Haplogroup or other?
Thanks for your opinions on this. I’m am eager to hear.
Rayman
Rasman
What a global combination of genetic profile you have there.
On your query: I think that U6 specifically U6b should be given more closer consideration in terms of the pioneer African migrants to the middle east.
However, middle east and east Africa are basically the same land. The same ancient littoral landmass, the same topography, same animals, same plants, how do you figure the humans on both sides would be different.
Read the Original Black African Arabs of Arabia series on this website.
One love
Jahdey
Thanks Jahdey;
I don’t think they are that different. My guess is that when the first of our family to finally get out of Africa left the horn they went to Yemen not to the north. It was there that the J lines were gathered. Just a note, my family line to Africa was not broken until 6 generations ago and they came through Europe (Spain and France). So even in Europe our people maintained a singular community. I’m not saying that in any way other than the fact. I don’t believe in racism or separatism coming from any direction Black or White. But there were clearly clades of Afro-Europeans presidig as distinct entities into at least the 1670s. Otherwise my line would not prove by DNA to be the same on all sides of the extended families. E3b1/J2b1. I am as equally proud to be a descendent of these brillant African pioneers from the horn as I am to be a direct descendent of the Capatin of the Huron Bear Clan among 17 other native American families. But I do get very disheartended to see lateral violence both among Africans as well as Amerindians (I am a Tribal Indain). Given our Afican history and how it spread globally, it just makes no sense to me. By the way, I look white since my mother was white. However, my father’s family looks either Black, Asian or Amerindian depending on the child (14 of them). And yes I saw some discrimination first hand but life is not always easy. We just overcome and move on.
Thank You for your response. I will read the link you have recommended.
Best Regards
Rasman
Jahdey;
Thanks for reminding me about U6b. It is a minority in it’s own right. Yes of course that lineage is also found in West Africa among some scattered other locations. I don’t know too much about it but it deserves serious consideration. I think the U6a lines may have reached the Americas long before Columbus but there is much work to be done to prove that and I try to avoid speculation. As far as I know I don’t have either of these lines but I find them very interesting nonetheless. The whole U group is interesting in that it also relates to Saami people who are very close in culture to Natie Americans. What is facinatig to me is that although all our brothers and sisters come from Africa originally, we still have these lines that did not evolve that far from their origins and are still identifiable in present African cultures. Now you got me stirred up on the U6b, I have to keep my eye out for any U6b DNA results here in America. We have some interesting and controversial U6a results already. Keep thinking and studying. Be well and keep the peace.
Best Regards
Rasman
everything is a mutation, from the apes to the first homo sapiens, etc.
race is an idea build by human. it doesn’t matter if you black, brown, white, etc. all that bulls**t is in our head. racism is also an idea by human. we are all human and nothing else matter in this case. so one world one love and hoppfully one future.
greetz
First n foremost hue means color in order to be a hue man you have to be a man of hue(color). Thank you
This article doesn’t go far enough. In fact it is as misleading as it accuses modern history of being, on account of its labeling original men Africans.
The name African is a Latin based word derived from Africus the indigenous Latin wind god representing a south westerly direction (in relation to Rome or Greece). Africa is merely the equivalent of Land to the South West and originally only a tiny piece of modern Tunisia was referred to by it.
To think that this word is used to describe the original inhabitants of every continent, knowing what it actually means, one must question either the competency of the writer prescribing it or his ulterior, clandestine or guarded motives.
Granted he may not be aware of the facts, he should still realize the word did not exist prior to the Grecian acquisition of the Pelasgians’ lands.
In other words, he uses this word to suggest a migration from Africa into Europe, when in fact Africa is the world’s largest human reservation.
Original men came to –no– fled to Africa from every place else.
Africa comes from the Roman general africanus. The original name is abukaland meaning mother of man kind r garden of Eden. If people of color aren’t original people they wouldn’t take up 85% of the worlds population.