BLACK LIKE THE FIRST EUROPEANS
The first people of Europe were prehistoric Africans. They lived mostly in the southern parts of Europe, and created many paintings and cave art throughout the region.
Pretentious scholars struggling with their self-inflicted racist diseases attach ill-fitting names to the first peoples of Europe. They call them funny names like Neanderthals, Paleolithic men, Mesolithic or Neolithic, Cro-Magnons, Grimaldi, Aurignicians, in a desperate bid to hide the cultural and historical identity of those people.
It is generally conceded by those scholars however, that the African people were the bearers of the first substantive elements of culture into the European continent.
Many thousands of years before the rise of the current pale tribes of Europe, an Afrocoid people known as the Grimaldi people, established the Aurignacian cultures. These people were anatomically modern human beings of the West African typology. They brought the first indications of cultural thoughts and rites into Europe.
The Grimaldi were Black Africans with very little body hair, black and smooth skin; they had the facial features typical of West African forest dwellers. They had kinky hair too. They arrived in Europe 40,000 to 50,000 years ago.
They ranged in height from tall to medium. Their culture had developed in Africa tens of thousands of years before they moved to Europe. It was called the Arugnician Culture. In 1994, scientists found corroborating evidence of stone and bone tools on the banks of the Semlike River in Zaire. They were finely crafted tools made between 75,000 to 100,000 years old long before modern humans migrated to Europe.
The Neanderthals non-modern human specie of man had left Africa early in time (80,000 years ago) and settled in central and southern Europe. It is speculated by bio-anthropologists that the genes of those Neanderthals are extensively sown in the modern European tribes of today.
The “Cro-Magnon,” people, late contemporaries and perhaps descendants of the Grimaldi people also existed in Central and Southern Europe many thousands of years after the Grimaldi Negroid had expanded to Europe but before the appearance of the pale version of Europe now known as Caucasians.
Actually, Caucasians as a race did not appear in Europe until about twenty to thirty thousand years after the arrival of the first Africans who by this very fact are the aboriginals of Europe.
WHENCE COMETH THE PALE ONE
There are many theories which seek to explain the reason for the switch in skin color of the Europeans. The theories proposed range from the Ice-Age effect theory, to those of miscegenation and others that suggest malnutrition. In all these theories lies the admission that the pale skin is a relatively recent genetic modification that occurred in originally Black Europe.
One of the more interesting propositions suggest that the change from black to pale Europe occurred as a result of miscegenation between the modern Africans arrivals in Europe and the primordial Neanderthal which had originally come from Africa. It should be noted that the primordial human Neanderthal (physiologically and intellectually) said to be among the ancestors of Europeans and Caucasians, also came from Africa to Europe about 80,000 years ago. Thus, the Neanderthal, which had apparently been forced to Eurpe from out of Africa, was also of the African genotype.
Some theories suggest that Neanderthals (who were originally black as all original Africans) later became pale-skinned and retained excessive body hair due to genetic selection responding to the need to adapt to the cold and darkness of Ice-Age Europe.
The modern day Europeans are the products of interbreeding between these mutated pale skin Neanderthals (i.e. mutated non modern-human Africa) and the later arriving modern black Africans of 40,000 -10,000 years ago i.e. the Grimaldis.
Warm blooded animals undergo de-pigmentation in the absence of light and warmth. If there were no Ice Age in Europe, the people would have remained Negroid/Black. Some of the darkest Africoid peoples still exist as the Australian Aborigines and Tasmanians. Their ancestors left Africa in the same waves as the Africans that went to Europe. It appears that of the anatomically modern human Africans who had migrated around the globe, those in the warmer southern climates retained their African pigmentation and those in the Northern climates lost theirs as a result of miscegenation with the pale skinned Neanderthals, who it should not be forgotten were originally of the African continent.
Ogu Eji Ofor Annu,
April 1, 2006
As an alien life form in study of your ape biped ,cardon organic,one planet,form of life i am interested as to when you will comence, the spread of man beyond your solar system ,at present i am driving a taxi this anables me to observe you,i also find your sun to hot though i like tail light they remind me of my sun.i find your primitive tribe like thonghts interesting. I CAN ASSURE HIS IS NOT A JOKE. Of cause you can aways depend on any form of life to think that it is made in gods image,As a life form THAT uses light to communiate i have been forced to use this crude form digital device. Judging by the above coments i would give you about 100 years befour you destroy yourselfs.DO YOU RELISE HOW MANY LIFE FORMS IN THE COSMOS GET DRUNK ON A FRIDAY ,SATUR DAY NIGHT
Wow the majority of people that replied to this article seem to be obsessed with race. I believe in the equality of humanity but I also believe in the equal representation of all ethnic groups in history books which will most likely see in american public/private school. There should books that show the contributions & accomplishments of all people instead of the just showing the accomplishments of one group and the sadness and struggles of all groups.
Ibn Ifriki, Afrikus or Ifrikesh Tubba or the Tubba Ifrikus is a well known Himyarite king of the Sabaeans living before 1000 B.C. in the time of Joshua son of Nun in the Yemen. King Ifriki according to many writers was ruler of the Sabaeans in Yemen came across the desert of Africa giving birth to the five major tribes of Berbers, including the Hawara, Gomara Masmuda Zenata Sanhaja. He is in other traditions called Farik. From his name came that of the Pharusii chariot using Berbers mentioned by the ancient Greek writers and the name of Aphren of Josephus, Afra of Cleodemus and Ephren or Aphren of the book of Genesis (son of Midian). His descendants colonized eastern Africa and the Sahara. Among their descendants are the Beni Ifren or Ifuraces branch of the modern Tuareg, the Afar and Afariyya tribes of Ethiopia, Eritrea, Yemen Somalia, modern Hadramaut and Oman.
If it became a Latin word for southwesterly wind the AFrican and Afro-Arabian traditions explain why.
The following info from a Eurocentric weblog shows the uselessness of arguing over haplotypes and genetics without physical anthropological foundations:
“A back migration from Asia to Africa took place around 15,000 years ago, with a group of R1b1* people moving to Egypt, Sudan and spreading in different directions inside Africa to Rwanda, South Africa, Namibia, Angola, Congo, Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, Cameroon, Nigeria, Ivory Coast, Guinea-Bissau. The hotspot is Cameroon. R1b1* was observed at a frequency of up to 95% in some tribes of northern Cameroon (like the Kirdi), and about 15% nationwide. It is probably where the early R1b people first settled, then spread south and east along the coast.”
The problem a lot of people are unaware that most Cromagnon and paleolithic, mesolithic and neolithic people around the Mediteranean including in North Africa were not biologically or not closely affiliated represented by modern Europeans. 15,000 years ago the majority of people in North africa were Mechtoids and other “Cro-Magnon” type people with craniofacial traits that were strongly tropical. These people had very little direct connection to modern European peoples or those called “Eurasian in the Middle East. in fact they were closer to modern sub-Saharan Africans. This has been known for many decades by anthropologists and modern physical anthropologists using genetic based traits have basically confirmed the earlier conclusions. Thus, the study done by Brace and several other reputable physical anthropological specialists who wrote and edited the paper proving the unrelatedness of most modern Europeans with ancient pre- Bronze Age Europeans showed very strong tropical and “Negroid” traits well into the neolithic. It also concluded many Bronze Age people were apparently not closely connected genetically to modern Europeans based on 24 well-tested craniofacila traits including the Mahalonobis statistic. “The surprise is that the Neolithic peoples of Europe and their Bronze Age successors are not closely related to the modern inhabitants, although the prehistoric/modern ties are somewhat more apparent in southern Europe. It is a further surprise that the Epipalaeolithic Natufian of Israel from whom the Neolithic realm was assumed to arise has a clear link to Sub-Saharan Africa.”
However the unrelatedness of ancient stone age Europeans to modern Europeans has long been known thus we here from the following specialists earlier.
Professor Willis Boughton in 1896, The History of Ancient Peoples 334-337 “Archeologists ahave found remains of three races in Europe. Two of these are generally classes as blacks , may be known as the Constant and the Cro-Magnon Race.”
“The discoveries of abundant prehistoric remains all over Europe particularly France. These with one accord tended to show that European aborigines of the Stone age were not Mongoloid like the Lapps, after all but the exact opposite. In every detail they resembled rather the dolicocecephalic Negoes of Africa.”” William Z. Ripley, Races of Europe p. 436
“The importance of the skeleton of the Cro- Magnon type is that in stature, prognathousm and shape of the orbits they exhibit approximation to the negro type more than any other which have been found in Europe.” P. 96 in Isaac Taylor, The Origin of the Aryans, first published 1889.
And in 2005 the Brace paper asserts – “If this analysis shows nothing else it demonstrates that the oft repeated European feeling that the Cro-Magnons are ‘us’ is more a product of anthropological folklore than the result of the metric data available from the skeletal remains.” see “The Questionable contribution of the Neolithic and Bronze Age to European Craniofacial form”, Loring Brace, Noriko Seguchi‡, Conrad B. Quintyn§, Sherry C. Fox, A. Russell Nelson, Sotiris K. Manolis**, by the National Academy of Sciences, which basically shows how weak the genetic link is between modern Europeans and most ancient Europeans including pre-Bronze Age Eurasiatic, regardless of what haplotype or other dna traits went where. This is due to the prevalence of African looking people in Europe and Asia until the neolithic. Something that early specialists before pseudoanthropological musings of Coon. (And even he classified the bulk of the small “Mediterranean Neolithic people as noticeably “Negroid” in craniofacial character.)
Brace’s study found that only a couple of populations in neolithic Germany to have some connection to the modern Europeans and Middle Easterners, including the modern Gaunches and Basques, and northward Berber speakers (also mainly mesocranic and brachycephalic peoples) unlike ancient Africans and modern Africans and ancient paleolithic and most neolithic Europeans and Eurasians.
In addition, recent studies have again shown as Lepsius had in the past that ancient Egyptians had essentially tropical traits.
Thus we read in another recent article, “The raw values in Table 6 suggest that Egyptians had the “super-Negroid” body plan described by Robins (1983).. This pattern is supported by Figure 7 (a plot of population mean femoral and tibial lengths; data from Ruff, 1994), which indicates that the Egyptians generally have tropical body plans. Of the Egyptian samples, only the Badarian and Early Dynastic period populations have shorter tibiae than predicted from femoral length. Despite these differences, all samples lie relatively clustered together as compared to the other populations.” (Zakrzewski, S.R. (2003). found in “Variation in ancient Egyptian stature and body proportions”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 121 (3): 219-229.
Finally it should understood that, just because certain haplotypes or other dna traits came to be carried by a variety of modern populations says little about where a modern population or physical type originated. What it does suggest, however, is that many modern Europeans and the affiliated modern Eurasian populations have asorbed previous non-Europoid populations that were present in European, North African and Eurasian regions. The Greeks, Kabyles and other European-like types may be a good example of this.
boy o boy you see what every one can see that the first humans were black and i agree that the black people of this world have un doubtedly been mis reprasented by some bad minded ignorant white people and i feel that this knowledge should be taught to pupils throughout the wetern community however fighting over who is right and who is wrong is crap we all have the same red blood in our veins we need to move forward as humans not black or white
wise white guy ur right peace and good things come with knowing the truth and revealingit to all and not lying as whites have doen repeatedly to oppress black and keeping them from knowing their true history
iisrael@prodigy.net
Blacks or by their true name moors wanted to know there history they can find out they just choose not to. Tell them look up noble drew ali. Avatar,prophet, angel to the lost children of the world.
This article needs to go on Facebook…for all to read….
only the rich eat the poor . im white,native amarican and some black im sure. scottsirish who came here in the 1600’s,had enter married with the native population. soon to be out cast and looked down upon bye pure white aristacratic rich people. who named us cohee,witch is my mothers family name,and it means anything except rich white.. it seems my people have never got any where. and the goverment is always and always has been enamies of my people,along with the rest of the country. red white black yellow lets stay amrican first and let liberty and justice for all finally stand in this natione for the first time ..read all the constatoutcion,and you will really know some truth ?!?!?!..
excuse my spelling.. thank you!!!
Well have anybody of you heard that GENETICLY IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT THE HUMAN RACE COME OUT OF MONKEYS.
Thise have been given in public last year. So all thise fucking family trees (from monkey to human), all thise given names to all kinf of spices betwen mankind and others are NOT TRUE.
So now we have to find our origine one more time. Geneticly we are almost the same(human, monkeys,….), we also have a lot of gens same as trees or any kind of plants, fish, …. WHY, WE ALL LIVE ON WATER PLANET, WE BREATH THE SAME AIR, so our bodies are adopted to thise conditions.
And i also dont understand some people who belives in God and they think that they came out of monkey. And in other hand that the world was created in 7 days. Which days our days on earth or God lenght of days, are they same or what they are?
About black africans in Europe, they came here long time ago true, well maybe they werent total black and they have been push out from different white tribes.
Whites has come much later buth from other directions and they comes with many waves. Long story.
History lies also true, especialy old white history. I am white to, but who cares about colour if the person is good.
The monkey fact is true …. True the Caucasians have monkey blood in them. Black people are 100% human and no animal DNA .
Albinos care about tone
An attempt to hide documented knowledge