Black Like The Ancient Europeans: The Black (First) Europeans

Spread the love
37
Shares

BLACK LIKE THE FIRST EUROPEANS

The first people of Europe were prehistoric Africans. They lived mostly in the southern parts of Europe, and created many paintings and cave art throughout the region.

Pretentious scholars struggling with their self-inflicted racist diseases attach ill-fitting names to the first peoples of Europe. They call them funny names like Neanderthals, Paleolithic men, Mesolithic or Neolithic, Cro-Magnons, Grimaldi, Aurignicians, in a desperate bid to hide the cultural and historical identity of those people.

It is generally conceded by those scholars however, that the African people were the bearers of the first substantive elements of culture into the European continent.

Many thousands of years before the rise of the current pale tribes of Europe, an Afrocoid people known as the Grimaldi people, established the Aurignacian cultures. These people were anatomically modern human beings of the West African typology. They brought the first indications of cultural thoughts and rites into Europe.

The Grimaldi were Black Africans with very little body hair, black and smooth skin; they had the facial features typical of West African forest dwellers. They had kinky hair too. They arrived in Europe 40,000 to 50,000 years ago.

They ranged in height from tall to medium. Their culture had developed in Africa tens of thousands of years before they moved to Europe. It was called the Arugnician Culture. In 1994, scientists found corroborating evidence of stone and bone tools on the banks of the Semlike River in Zaire. They were finely crafted tools made between 75,000 to 100,000 years old long before modern humans migrated to Europe.

The Neanderthals non-modern human specie of man had left Africa early in time (80,000 years ago) and settled in central and southern Europe. It is speculated by bio-anthropologists that the genes of those Neanderthals are extensively sown in the modern European tribes of today.

The “Cro-Magnon,” people, late contemporaries and perhaps descendants of the Grimaldi people also existed in Central and Southern Europe many thousands of years after the Grimaldi Negroid had expanded to Europe but before the appearance of the pale version of Europe now known as Caucasians.

Actually, Caucasians as a race did not appear in Europe until about twenty to thirty thousand years after the arrival of the first Africans who by this very fact are the aboriginals of Europe.

WHENCE COMETH THE PALE ONE

There are many theories which seek to explain the reason for the switch in skin color of the Europeans. The theories proposed range from the Ice-Age effect theory, to those of miscegenation and others that suggest malnutrition. In all these theories lies the admission that the pale skin is a relatively recent genetic modification that occurred in originally Black Europe.

One of the more interesting propositions suggest that the change from black to pale Europe occurred as a result of miscegenation between the modern Africans arrivals in Europe and the primordial Neanderthal which had originally come from Africa. It should be noted that the primordial human Neanderthal (physiologically and intellectually) said to be among the ancestors of Europeans and Caucasians, also came from Africa to Europe about 80,000 years ago. Thus, the Neanderthal, which had apparently been forced to Eurpe from out of Africa, was also of the African genotype.

Some theories suggest that Neanderthals (who were originally black as all original Africans) later became pale-skinned and retained excessive body hair due to genetic selection responding to the need to adapt to the cold and darkness of Ice-Age Europe.

The modern day Europeans are the products of interbreeding between these mutated pale skin Neanderthals (i.e. mutated non modern-human Africa) and the later arriving modern black Africans of 40,000 -10,000 years ago i.e. the Grimaldis.

Warm blooded animals undergo de-pigmentation in the absence of light and warmth. If there were no Ice Age in Europe, the people would have remained Negroid/Black. Some of the darkest Africoid peoples still exist as the Australian Aborigines and Tasmanians. Their ancestors left Africa in the same waves as the Africans that went to Europe. It appears that of the anatomically modern human Africans who had migrated around the globe, those in the warmer southern climates retained their African pigmentation and those in the Northern climates lost theirs as a result of miscegenation with the pale skinned Neanderthals, who it should not be forgotten were originally of the African continent.

Ogu Eji Ofor Annu,

April 1, 2006


Spread the love
37
Shares

178 thoughts on “Black Like The Ancient Europeans: The Black (First) Europeans”

  1. man a lotta peoples concept of race is just about rediculous. all u gotta do is look at peoples faces. its not rocket science. north africans(moors berbers etc. are not “black”(i guess by “Black” if your talkin ethnicly {not socially} u mean central african features and skin tone)…so does that make light skinned south africans less black? i dont get it. it dont add up. north east (horn of africa area) africans are pretty much half black half arab…just look at any eritrean somali and many sudanese…just like burmese(myanmar) fools are pretty much half indian/ half khmer…all it takes is your own 2 eyeballs and half a brain. think on it.
    its like calling a korean, a thai, japanese and a cambodian “asian” u people think they look ANYTHING alike? your tripping.

    same thing goes for the way most africans look. its a HUGE continent filled w MANY peoples…who see themselves as different peoples.
    AND ‘White”(another completely rediculous word for like 50 different races) european tribes. u try to lump so many diverse peoples into one “white” “black” “asian” or ‘Latin” race based on just skintone and you already fell out the ignorant tree and hit every branch on the way down.

    yall mostly sound like a bunch of afrocentric or eurocentric nerds choking on hater tots on both sides of this argument. grow up. honestly.

    and guess what..NEWSFLASH! it doesnt even MATTER!!!..lol
    none of your descendants are gonna be “white” or “black” in any sense of the way YOU see it within 4 generations anyhow

    another 10 gens and everyone can calm down and be brown. u got no choice but to sit back and watch all your seeds mingle. haha..do the math.

    yall can get all huffy and puffy about who did what and went were first and who enslaved who…EVERYONE HAS AT SOME POINT… but in the end we r all one to begin with and allways have been below the skin and we are well on the way to physically looking like one global peoples on the out side and WILL be in pretty much of a sneeze as far as time is concerned.

    the alterior race hate/pride motives in all these posts are SO obvious…
    go make a half black baby or something.
    youll feel better. ill feel better.

    readin this has must agravate u pinche angry race centric fools off
    but it makes me giggle like im stuck on stupid.
    nature allways laughs last.

    oh indeed.

    say it wont.

    1. Awsome.

      I totally agree with this post.

      Yeah, I’m white. But who cares? We need to pass these categories.

      EVERYONE invaded someone else, did bad crap, whatever, in all directions. We need to see each other as just people, have more mixed marriages. Let’s make one race!

      One World!!!

  2. my comment is for all those well meaning blacks whom suggests that the world will be just A.O K> once we all just mix it all up to a nice golden brown.Guess what my friend ; we all ready did ; their called arabs . problem is ;they found it convenient to enslave their darker brothers some where in the not to distance pass . this whole idea about blacks that happen to have a lighter hue , and therefore feel them selfs some what superior, is in it self a sickness perpetuated by there lack of understanding the brain washing they them selfs have been subjected to. one need only to look at the arabs situation in you no where to prove my point. Never the less this web site in my opinion is not about RACE ; it is about historical correctness it is important that blacks refute the image that the powers that be have impose upon them by distorting there contribution to the world .
    It is the same as if some future empire other than whites where plunder tombs of presidents then impose their own images in their place , then take credit for all the achievements. Every white would be outraged. THE only obvious thing is that blacks have been mentally sabotaged by all this misinformation. By the time a young black reach 6 grade he or she is already left to wonder where they fit in to the contribution to the world .WE seek to stop this mental abuse by correcting the lies .

  3. The argument of Black Africa has much evidence on both sides. The existence of Black Africans in egypt is certain. If they were the origins and their influence is hard to determine. You should not speek with such athority on either side.

  4. Good reasoning here, I am loving it. Thanks so much! Let the truth be told. Thank You Yahawa! for taking the blind folds of my people’s eye. Thats right, RISE UP MY PEOPLE….. HaleLuYah!

  5. Wow…there are some seriously angry people out there. What I don’t get, and will never get, is how a person of one (ANY) color/race can cry racism and in the virtual next breath spew ignorance and hatred for all those opposite of themselves.

    Where I live “white/Caucasian” is minority. However, it is nearly impossible to tell until hearing someone speak. One of my best friends in the area was thought to be Italian, sounded Puerto Rican and surprised everyone with the reality of fleeing Iran mixed about garbage in back of a truck to save her 13 year old brother from his “military requirement”.

    Every race/religion/creed has its flaws along with historical aghasts, but regardless of something as frivolous as appearance, shouldn’t we ALL be contributing towards PROGRESS in this day and age??

    Peace is a choice.

  6. Erika, this is not about people being “angry” and “peace on earth good will toward men.” This is about the restoration of a history that was deliberately distorted, destroyed and suppressed for centuries by a global white power collective, which needed to justify its agenda of white domination of the planet. To convince a people to be slaves, you needed to make them believe they came from nothing. This is not about how someone looks or your friends. This is about truth. Anyone who fears it is in alliance with error. You’re not talking about real peace, because that cannot come so long as lies rule. You’re talking about acquiescence. Fear of offending. But anyone who fears to offend others for a just cause, is a copping out. Peace through respect of equality and heritage is genuine, peace through surrender of one’s identity to avoid discomfort, is cowardice.

Comments are closed.