Blue Blood is Black Blood 1500-1789 – Egmond Codfried

Spread the love
11
Shares

Blue Blood is Black Blood – By – Egmond Codfried

During the Middle Ages Black peoples in Europe were called Blue men. There seem to be images of this period which show Bleu people. I know of a Renaissance crucifixion scene with a light blue Jesus. In the Renaissance we start seeing many, many images of blacks, called The Moor.

Mike Nassau writes about Nubians and Iranians which were brought to Europe in 50 BC by Caesar to fight the Germanic nations. They stayed on and had their own communities along the Rhine and the Danube. Nassau states that in the 17th century Europeans arrived in America who were called Black Dutch. They were not treated like the Africans who were held in slavery. Many Whites were also kept as slaves or slave like conditions. Later on Black and coloured families claimed descend from these Black Dutch to prevent re-enslavement or being treated as niggers. The point is that somehow Black and coloured people were present in Europe and managed to keep their Black looks through intermarriage till at least the 17 century.

I suggest we look at the Moor in European Art and take it from there. In European Art the Moor is always a Classical African: pitch black, frizzled hair, a flat and wide face, flat nosed, thick lips, and subnasal prognasty.

When you study the symbol of the Moor from The Renaissance (1500) you will find that it did not start out like a Black Servant or a Black Page. The Drake Jewel (1575) shows the profile of a Black King dominating the profile of a White woman. This symbolises Africa dominating Europe and Black superiority in Europe.

The symbol of the Moor shows a Blue man which is a Black man and means Blue Blood. We see many portraits of the nobility in which they pose very intimate with a little Black boy or girl which gives the sitter riches, mostly pearls which seem to symbolise Europe.The nobility was coloured, and some showed more African or Asian or White treats. These portraits are kept hidden or are destroyed around the French Revolution (1789).

Inside The Drake Jewel is a miniature of Queen Elizabeth I. Her father’s sister Mary Tudor was the grandmother of Mary of Scots. Mary of Scots son was James I who married Anne of Denmark. They were the grandparents of Charles II Stuart who was named “The Black Boy.”

He was described on a wanted poster issued by parliament as a tall Black man and I do not think they were fooling around.

Anne of Denmark had ordered a play “The Masque of Blackness” (1605) in praise of Black beauty which did not fade. The play was performed by members of the court and it explained how Blacks, The Sun People, came to Europe to look for a milder sun. In the play was a personage of The Niger River. The costume design shows a tall Black woman. Strange as this might sound; it took me after all three years to believe my own findings: Anne of Denmark which we know as a blindingly blond woman was almost certainly Black. As the whole Stuart dynasty was Black of skin.

When one looks for portraits of Charles II Stuart “The Black Boy” one finds many which show a White man, with long black hair and mustachio. But if one persists there are portraits which show black skin. Especially the National Portrait Gallery site shows many portraits of a Black skinned boy and later a Black adult. Still there is a lot of variations, but I have one pitch black portrait which show his classical African treats under a huge afro-like wig.

So there were Black Kings in Europe, who somehow traced their origins in Africa and symbolised their Blue blood with the image of a Moor. The portraits which show Blacks as White’s I would explain as propaganda to make them look as the White people they so despotically oppressed. Other white portraits are over painted authentic Black portraits, or whitened copies of these or outright fakes. All European museums show portraits of the European elite, with fake white skin colour. We know that all the European royal families were blood relatives.

The Black Boy’s mother, for instance, Henrietta Maria, was the daughter of Maria de Medici, Queen of France and the aunt of Louis XIV, The Sun King. The sister of The Black boy was Maria Henrietta Stuart who married the Dutch Stadholder William II. Their son was King Stadholder William III, who ruled Britain as William and Mary.

(All this can be verified in google)


Spread the love
11
Shares

71 thoughts on “Blue Blood is Black Blood 1500-1789 – Egmond Codfried”

  1. Oh my! How fascinating,enlightening!
    What do you think, was it jealousy or fear of the black skin?

  2. The Masque of Blackness seems pretty racist to me, as it was followed up by The Masque of Beauty where the Africans had been “cured” for their blackness. Atleast thats what Wikipedia says, but thats not really a good source.

  3. This is still a work in progress and I believe to have found the source of racism today. Europe was dominated and despotically oppressed by a Black and Coloured race which claimed Blue Blood (1500-1789). The fear of this happening again made Europeans revise history and go and oppress Blacks and Coloureds worldwide. A Barack Obama, presidential candidate, could not be possible in Europe today. Some European museum curators seem to know of this past, as they knowingly hide Black portraits and show white fakes or over paintings. Most White’s are just indoctrinated and victims in a way. But the personal descriptions are clear: they were not White looking and they sat on thrones all over Europe. White supremacy is based on fake portraits of Black and Coloured European Kings.

    Egmond Codfried

    1. Mr. Egmond the facts of Alhambra and the very decree that was forced on the then ruling class, seem at least to demonstrate that the remnant of the Moors and their continent were forced into extreme conditions, conditions that may have started by the so-called Blue Blood as you mention. The beginning of hash assault on Africans, the trouble with slave trade a few centuries latter, all started with the rise of Europe in terms of identity which was the result that came from all manner of treatment towards the former Black royalty of Spain, and from Spain the racial issue took on an added weight in terms of exploitation and in terms of legalised commercial wholesale of Human lives. Part taking advantage, part vengers. Don’t forget, the Moors also bought and sold slaves including their fellow Africans…and of course others.

  4. Very strange, but after seeing the recent rendition of Tut by forensic specialists in the recent 2008 tour in the U.S. I believe many such things as painting over earlier darker renderings of European royalty to be very possible in many cases. Too bad.

  5. The black European nobility and royalty left many leads about their black identity called Blue blood. There are so many Moors in western art, jewellery, art works, paintings, statues, heraldry and family names. My research is based on personal descriptions which mention black looks. Eurocentrism talks about these people as Black caucasians, white people with black skin. How is this possible? Even while many show real classical african looks. Blacks should start writing their own history and not rely anymore on white supremacy nonsense.

  6. egmond u r so right but then again the plight of white americas pride in being white will spell and is spelling their downfall like the bible says pride comes before the fall and white people dont even see it happenning the world is fading back to black and the world for all arguments sake is black u cant escape just accept it as fact balck is superior over white and this fact eats away at white `people to no end.

    the universe is black for when the sun goes down its pitch black the food we eat grows in the rich fertile blak soil when a child in conceived its with in the blackness of a woman s womb and lastly for life to exist on this planet we must have carbon carbon is black and lastly a white woman having my baby the child will be dark complected.

    Im convinced that white people suffer from a condition i will call ignorance plain and simple and the belief that they have done it all which on its face is utterly ridiculous and doesnt deserve any space here for me to recite or debate for debating stupidity ignorance and lies only drives that indidual down the road to no where the road to self destruction for all lies and liars shall be proven just that and suffer the ridicule of th world of which they deserve and this will be the plight of white america which has stolen the history of black people and have lied about thier role in history and their great accomplishment only to embellish their own while denigrating another.

    this cant happen for long for right wins always in the end and those who seek to do wrong shall be the price for their insolence and destructive behavior and made to correct the lies in the end and for the true doer of that history shall be lifted upon high to take their rightful place in history.

    certainly the wanna be jews is included in this since i am also a jew and black white people cant be jews this is a joke and a farce and shall be made clear as the world becomes more and more clear as to who the real jews are and who really gave the world civilization.

    the black man and woman did

    iisrael@prodigy.net 1 829 990 8267

    shalom one and all to stay black always

  7. Dear friends, I’m happy to see that more people are putting up my theory blue blood is black blood (1500-1789) on their website.

    Sadly enough I have noticed that whites, any white person, will respond with blind panic, irrationality and ridicule if I try to explain these matters to them. Perhaps they are even in fear off each other and do not want to be labelled ‘nigger lover.’ Who knows?
    Yet I believe they deserve some consideration as they were dominated by blacks, so they were taught to fear blacks. This fear is instilled through education, media, movies, anything. The indoctrination is so strong and pervasive that other coloureds and even blacks are affected.
    To change this we have to combat the religious believe called white supremacy. The idea is that whites because of their colour are better, have better intelligence, better moral values, less likely to make a mess of some undertaking, more honest, more considered, less violent, better in looks etc.

    This fallacy can easily be deconstructed by realizing that whites came out of blacks. Whites are descendents of albino’s as both lack the ability to produce melanin and some are still very white and immediately burn in the sun, while others are mixed with darker phenotypes and are able to tan. Human albinism is more then the classical albino with red eyes. There are albino variations which in description sound like what we consider normal whites with darker hair, darker eyes and the ability to tan. Albinism is hereditary.

    There seems to be a need to medicalise albinism while they are normal, functioning people who just need to take some precautions before they venture out in the sun. Believe it or not, blacks were described in the 19th century as riddled with diseases and their extinction was eminent. Whites do this today against albino’s and recent this obvious comparison. They respond with some strange Wikipedia science saying that blacks slowly turned white in a mysterious process, about 6000 years ago. That’s actually when the whites left central Asia and settled in Europe, where they met the first Europeans, who were black and coloured.

    While in the whole of nature every white life form comes from albinism. We have white roses and dark roses, white mice and grey mice, white cat and black cat and white gorilla and black gorilla. Yet we do not consider a white cat as defect or sick or put a higher or lower value on white cats, white dogs, white roses or white squirrels. White and black in regard to humans are political terms to divide and to oppress.

    I feel that the first step needed is to eradicate white supremacy by showing every black person images of albinism among flowers, animals, primates and humans. Whites came out of blacks and are in no way superior. If they appear superior there must be other machinations in play. Like white supremacy is based on whitened, fake over painted portraits of a European elite which was described as black and coloured.

    Moors are classical Africans found in Western art. I would like to advice blacks to come away from discussions about the Spanish Mores because this confuses the matter. The Arab Moors encountered black, coloured and white Europeans. The cultured black, noble and royal Europeans made Europe what it is today, but became cruel and despotic. This resulted in the French Revolution. Blacks abducted and held other blacks in slavery, and there are still blacks today who collaborate to keep other blacks down.

Comments are closed.