British Academics Angry At New GCSE Course That Says Africans Arrived In Britain Before The English
AFRICANGLOBE – A new GCSE history course, said to teach students that Africans arrived in Britain before the English, has caused uproar among some British academics.
The module, which will be offered by the Oxford and Cambridge examination board (OCR) from September, was created with academics from the Black and Asian Studies Association.
It will cover new arrivals to the UK from the Romans up to modern day migrants such as those from Syria and eastern Europe and assess the reasons for immigration, the experience of new entrants and the impact on the indigenous population.
The course is called Migration To Britain c. 1,000 to c. 2010. Its literature states: “This course will enable students to learn how the movement of people – European, African, Asian – to and from these islands has shaped the story of this nation for thousands of years.
“The history of migration is the story of Britain: in 1984, Peter Fryer wrote, ‘There were Africans in Britain before the English came.’”
But V.S. Naipaul, the Booker and Nobel prize-winning novelist, told reporters on Sunday: “Once again political correctness is distorting our history and the education of our children.” (Editor’s note: V.S. Naipaul is ethnically a south Indian man who had grown up in one of the Caribbean Islands)
Historian Sir Roy Strong, author of The Story Of Britain, said: “This stands history on its head, projecting back on to the past something that isn’t true.
“The only Africans who came here were a few with the Romans who came and then left. I find it disturbing that our children should be taught something that is clearly designed to feed into contemporary problems rather than tell our island’s story properly.”
A book on the course reading list, written by a Marxist historian, is said to refer to a Roman legion of North Africans briefly stationed on Hadrian’s Wall in the 3rd Century, before the arrival of Anglo-Saxons.
But the newspaper states that while up to 500 “Aurelian” Moors – named in honour of Emperor Marcus Aurelius – manned a fort near Carlisle, there is no evidence they settled there.
Antony Beevor, the military historian and author, said: “Migration is a very valid area to study, but if it’s a question of rewriting history to bolster the morale of certain sections of the population, rather than a scrupulous attitude towards facts, then that is a total distortion and it’s outrageous.”
Prof Alan Smithers, of Buckingham University, a specialist adviser to the Commons Education Committee, said: “This seems to be aimed more at indoctrination than education. It is dangerous because a cohesive society depends on an authentic shared view of history.”
However, Prof Mark Ormrod, of York University, one of the historians researching the new topic, told the newspaper: “It is an outstanding example of how a long view of history helps us to understand and to find a place for ourselves in contemporary society.
“Our research project shows how, for example, in the late Middle Ages, no one was more than ten miles from an immigrant.”
Mike Goddard, head of history at OCR, said: “There is no political bias. The GCSE will present facts. It is not pushing any particular argument.”
By: Victoria Ward
http://www.africanglobe.net/headlines/british-academics-angry-gcse-africans-arrived-britain-english/
In these times of enlightenment these British academics whosoever they are need to bear in mind, that you can fool some of the people some of the times, but not all the people all of the times.
The bones of the Kshite/ Afikan ancestor will speak volumes to the power of truth and world history and not the warped ideology of global white supremacy.
These academics follow the narrative of the head of European history at Oxford in 1966 a man name Roper who said that Afrika has no history, except the history of a people group called Europeans with a claim to be WHITES.
The Moors were a race of African peoples who practiced Islam and travelled between the far east to the European lands and brotish isles.
They traded and fought with equal zest while both taking prisoners for slaves and for marital relations purposes as they were allowed to have relarions with slaves.
It is a historically recorded fact that the “White seagoing discoverers who discovered South Africa” did so by following Arab and Chinese maps yet these items were purposely left out of european history books.
All the Ancient KINGS of Europe we of Africa descendants. According to history KING James and his Son prince Charles were black. The European lands were inhabited by black nations before they were occupied by white people. If white people were told the truth from the beginning they would not be angry now. Their own people hid the truth of history from them. What was hidden will become uncovered. The world did not want the black people to know their history but the LORD GOD ALMIGHTY SAYS HE will reveal who his true people are when the time come in his prophetic words. It’s no good for people to get angry and vex. What the world need to do is to repent from their transgression against the Black Races before it is too late for them. May GOD ALMIGHTY have mercy on us all.
Wben so many cbildren east coast and west fighting and killing each other these words need to reach them.