What about the African Slave Trade?
Much of the so-called African Slave Trade was fabricated. There was no trade! An independent source showing that the so-called Indians on the Eastern Seaboard (also called Terra Nova), were Moors, is a book called; “Africans and Native Americans”, by Jack D. Forbes. He shows in the book how many so-called Native American Indians were sold into slavery in Africa and Europe. This is the opposite direction in which we were taught the slave trade went in. These Native Americans or Indians were classified as Negroes and Blacks in the slaves books of Seville Spain and elsewhere. On page 29 he says; ” slaves from Terranova show up in the slave markets of Seville and Valencia very soon after 1500. For example; in Valencia during the period to 1516, we find in 1503 Miguel, Manne, in 1505 Juan and Pedro, in 1507 Antonio and Juan Amarco, in 1515 Ali, now Melchor, in 1516 Catalina. … they were all classified as Negroes…”. if we were first brought to North America around 1619 or even 1555, for that matter, then how were they taking slaves from Newfoundland, to Europe? Keep in mind that one of the “Native Americans” even had the name “Ali” and all were classified as Negro once they reached Yalencia. How did a Native American in 1515 have the Moorish name “Ali”?
At least 3,000 Americans (so-called Indians) are known to have been shipped to Europe between 1493 and 1501 (the Columbus Expeditions), with the likely total being possibly double that. Most were sent to the Seville area, where they seem to show up in the slave markets as Negroes. These are major contradictions to the whole slave trade myth. Blacks were always in America! The “Missing Indians” are Negroes! The slaves sold on the slave markets in the South were initially the black people from right here in this Hemisphere. As they took the lands here, they enslaved the inhabitants of those lands who were blacks. The tens of millions of Americans (so-called Indians) who disappeared after 1492 did not all die in the ‘holocaust’ inflicted within America. Many thousand were sent to Europe and Africa as slaves. The whole slave trade myth is that the whole story was given to us in reverse. A mass colony of Africans were not shipped from Africa to America, but the truth is that Black Indians were shipped from America to Europe! They were then shipped from Spain to Africa as commodity for African resources. These Black Indians (now mistaken as Africans) were shipped back to America and classified as “African Slaves.” This part of our history is what the school systems failed to mention in their history programs!
Are you saying that there was no Slave Trade?
There was indeed a kidnapping of Africans from Africa to America. However, it was a result of the mass shipment and slaughter of Moors in America at the hands of Columbus’ expeditions. Columbus’ first journey in 1492 was a mission to capture gold but he was side tracked by the presence of the black Moors. Columbus sent word back to the Monarchs of Spain that there were (what he referred to in his logs as the people of Queen Sheba). Columbus kidnapped Arawak Indians along with gold nuggets, exotic birds, and grain. Queen Isabella provided Columbus with seventeen ships, 1500 men, cannons, crossbows, guns, and attack dogs for the second voyage. Columbus’ new mission was to conquer the West. When Columbus returned to the West (Haiti) and South America in 1493, he not only took raw materials and resources but he abducted women. After a short time the Arawaks resisted Columbus and on March 25, 1495 Columbus slaughtered thousands of Arawak natives of men, women, and babies. Columbus also rounded up 1500 Arawaks and shipped them to Spain.
Columbus became the first man known in history to send the first slaves across the Atlantic. Other nations rushed to emulate Columbus. In 1501 the Portuguese began to depopulate the Beotuk Indians to Cape Verde as slaves. The black Indian slavery destroyed the Indian nations of Natchez, Yamasee, Pequots. Because of this, the first African slave raid took place in 1505 and was spearheaded by Columbus’ son. When the Moors (Indians) of America began dying and committing suicide the labor was replaced with slaves from the Sahara in West Africa. Also, the gold and silver that Columbus extracted from America fueled a 400% inflation that eroded the economies of non European nations and helped Europe to develop a global market system. Africa suffered a great economical blow. The Trans-Saharan trade collapsed because America supplied more precious gems than the African West Coast. African traders now only had one commodity that Europe wanted, slaves! African Sultans thus sold their own black people into slavery to whites. It is safe to say that Columbus is solely responsible for the slavery of the Moors from West to East and from East to West. REFER TO BLOOD MONEY.
http://lostfeather.weebly.com/washitaw.html
It is ironic that nobody talks about the African trade slave, in regards to the Barbary Slave Trade that existed from the 15th-19th centuries. Ironically, the seed that started the Abolitionist movement in North America, which led to slavery ending, was a petition written by four Quakers in Germantown, Pennsylvania in 1688. The idea behind the petition? The hypocrisy of Europeans being against the Barbary Slave Trade and for the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade (supported with Biblical ideology and Golden Rule).
The author of this article also needs to learn about the history of the Trans-Saharan slave trade, which predates Columbus by 600 years.
Maybe, someday, people will look at history based on the content of character of individuals, not the color of skin stereotyping (those damn Europeans … white Europeans).
The so-called Indians are really Hebrew Israeli Jews from the twelve tribes of Judah. The are called the tribe of Gas. They are the most high chosen people.
Hebrews are not Africans. Hebrews come from Shem, not from the tribe of Ham. Africa’ s name is Ham. Africa was named after a Italian navigator. African Americans are not black, but different shades of brown. Whites are not White, but red. Names and history are established to elevate one group of people against another group.
You surely need an anthropological classes!Who taught you that?Blacks are not Ham!The Hamites are Egypt,Libya,Ethiopia and Syrians.You can steal our Shem heritage on paper but cannot,genetically!
All those groups were so called black (in appearance that is)…And Israel was said to look like Egypt/Ethiopia so they too, are black in appearance.
Who give a damn mix American Blacks and mix Puerto Ricans are no race people. they will never come together that is why the beast white devils fuck over them.
Danny your comments reflect Mormon teachings, are you?
Why is this kept and secret where cani get more info
I am more and more convinced that West and Central Africans had colonies in the Americas before, at the time of and after the so called discovery by Columbus in 1492.
I posted an article years ago about “Congolese Towns” in Latin America”. I expanded my research and I have come to the conclusion that African Kingdoms and Empires colonized parts of Latin America. African colonizers were immortalized in place names of numerous geographic locations like Congo River (Panama and Ecuador), Mandinga River, Island etc, (Panama), Lago de Guineo (Florida).
The words guinea or guineo are often used for place names across Latin America.
Someone said that place names are a reflection of culture and history, a reflection of us. They are a reflection of the who, what, when, where, and why at the time they were given.
The Spaniards were supposedly responsible for naming all these geographic locations. I do not buy that all.
There remains the question as to why the Spaniards named geographic locations after the place of origin of their African slaves. In addition how did happen ?
Can someone share his or her opinions on this ?
Because most of the time they named the places after what language the people where speaking.
It was easier for them to catalog the groups of natives
Kiloecho
Africa hahah
America ruled the World Before 1492 not Afrika
My coworker and I were talking about this today. I don’t want to cause any problems and I do beleive that we have a strange idea of how migration happened and that there were more peoples and groups of people in the “New” land than history states.
Anyway I just want to know what your references are because I want to learn more and the only thing I have found in the couple minutes of searching is one website and more of your posts. If you could help this searcher I would appreciate it. 🙂