Global Slave System of the Western World: Nehesy
The “kingdom” of Angola has been created by Portuguese in order to create a slave supply province for their colonies but also for their slave business interests (selling slaves to spanish for instance).
Ndongo later called Angola was only one of the several south provinces of the Congo Kingdom with a congolese Vassal. Kabasa or Mbanza was the capital of the Ndongo Province, the vassal ruler was called Ngola.
The congolese vassal of Congo was controlled by Portuguese but the real king of this created kingdom was the portuguese Paul Diaz and his followers ( ie the Portuguese Governors of Angola) . This criminal portuguese (slave trader) made several plots against the congolese people, he was put in jail for 7 yrs in 1561 ( with 2 portuguese Priests) because he failed one of them.
After this period of 7 yrs in Jail he went back in Portugal. He was appointed Governor of Angola ( which didn’t exist yet ) by his king in April 1574. Since then he prepared an armed expedition to take control of this Congolese province.
Paul Diaz left Lisbon in October 1574 with a portuguese army : 7 ships with 700 Soldiers. The portuguese war of destruction in order to create a new kingdom ( a slave supply province) started.
” …Some slaves were stolen by Europeans ‘panyared’ as the english word was and some as ocurred often in Angola, were the victims of military campaigns mounted specifically by Portuguese proconsuls in order to capture slaves…”
Hugh Thomas, The slave trade (1997) , page 792
“Spanish records report that in mid-july, ‘English corsairs’ waylaid and captured the Portuguese slaver Sao Joao Bautista. She had below decks some 370 Angolans, who had been taken prisoner during Portugal’s bloody war of conquest in Luanda”
Don Jordan and Michael Walsh , White Cargo (2008), Page 87
The general excuse is that Africans sold other Africans which is not the whole truth.
– Europeans specially Portuguese kidnapped first many Azanaghi and others in Africa;
– The first slaves of the Portuguese and specially the Spanish of the new worlds were their white convicts brethen ( Forzados and Lançados) and some Berber or Azanaghi ; You had Berber slaves in Hispaniola (santo domingo), and cuba for instance ( see Michael Gomez , ” Black Crescent)
– Europeans furnished guns to their African allies in order to get slaves, during the political troubles;
– The African rulers who sold their subjects were actually fake kings empowered by their European Allies (Portuguese and French), like the JAGAS of congo. They made slave raids with the portuguese but the very day they rebelled against their masters , they were attacked and sold as slaves in Brazil ( see : Maroon societies by Richard Price)
– Some of the biggest slave traders in Africa were White and Mulattoes like : William Ormond, John Ormond, Faber, Gomez, Lightburn etc
The funny thing is that in historic books , Native Indians rebelled against slavery and preferred to die , it’s a big lie. Native Indians in the Caribbean have been the first slaves of the new world ( Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola), Colombus in his 3rd Trip sent 700 hundreds native indians slaves to Spain. See José Antonio Saco “Historia de la esclavitud” or Eric Williams
Nevertheless French and English allowed a Native Indian Slave trade by furnishing guns to their allies, divide and rule this is what they know best. For the Indian slavery see these 2 books:
– Barbara Olexer , ” The enslavement of the American Indian in colonial times”
– Alan Galley , “The Indian Slave Trade”
Nevertheless Africans are the only one deshumanized for supposedly selling their own (remember that there is as much difference between a French and a Spanish than between a Wolof and a Bambara).
Europeans have targeted Africa for their supply demand , in the new world there was :
– Native American and Caribbean slaves : Virgina, Maryland, Hispaniola , Puerto Rico, Cuba, North and South America, Martinique, Guadeloupe
– White slaves : Spanish, Portuguese, French, Danish, Scotts, Irish, White Berbers, Turks, Arabs and Jews ( the laters being result of the inquisition)
– Asian Slaves : Philipinos, Indians, Bengalis, Indian and chinese ‘coolies’ came to replace the blacks after emancipation in Cuba , Jamaica, Barbados, Trinidad etc
And then African slaves.
We’re the only one subject to evil remarks about a supposed intern slave trade….
– English sold english, scots and Irish
– Spanish sold white female slaves for white breeding purpose in Hispaniola
– French sold poor french to their planters in Saint Domingue
– Some native Indians ( same remark : some of them didn’t speak the same language, nor did they share the same culture) sold other native indians to the French in order to get guns…
The only culprits for me are Europeans why ?
– They Planned it
– They Financed it
– They Insured it
– They Furnished the weapon on mass destruction for this purpose
( powder and guns)
– They are the only one who profited hugely for this crime against humanity : Banks, Big Families, Nations, and even their own people because it is well known that the African Slave trade was one of the biggest element which allowed the Industrial revolution (see Inikori).
Nehesy
Oh, my gosh! I didn’ t know that you were sooo ignorant, Nehesy! Wy do you constantly deny Black supremacy??? You forget that US BLACKS were the worldrulers fore THOUSANDS OF YEARS!!! You more trained than me??? Comon, don’t fool yourself. You constantly condradict yourself. You teach that we built all the worldcivilizations and that we enslaved Whites for thousands of years, then you deny OUR responsability fore the so-called “Transatlantic Slave Trade”. Fore the 3600 times, again, US BLACKS started science, technology, music, economics and also THE INSTITUTION OF SLAVERY!!! While building high civilizations with our advanced technology, we cruelly enslaved, dominated and oppressed ALL THE OTHER RACES!!! Believe it or not, like it or not, it’s the cold hard truth.
Let us check and make a logical conclusion again:
* The Black Moors conquered and dominated Europe fore almost 800 years
* The Moors were much smarter and much more technicly advanced than the White
Europeans
* The Moors established slavery in Europe and enslaved millions of Whites also fore
almost 800 years
* The Moors dominating Europe means dominating the WHOLE WESTERN WORLD
You forget that many Moors sailed to and inspected the Americas LONG BEFORE Columubus, so they were actually already ruling the Americas. But of course the Moors also raped and killed millions of White women. The Moors established sex slavery/prostitution in Europe. The Moors also massacred and castrated a lot of White males during their 800 years long rule.
The Moors were the crual oppressors of Europe, NOT the civilizisers. They used their advanced technology only fore themselves, fore the purpose of BLACK SUPREMACY!!! The Moors were racist Black supremacists who wanted to dominate the whole planet, period. Yes, it’s true that they also held African slaves, but during their rule there were much more White slaves than African slaves (they ruled from 7th century until the 15th century). The Moors called themselves proud the Swarty people and their White slaves and subjects disdainful the Ruddy people. Dark skin was a batch of honor and a sign of RACIAL SUPERIORITY, while pale skin was a sign of RACIAL INFERIORITY.
And in case of the European elite, according to the brilliant Black scholar Egmond Codfried – you can read his works here one Rasta Livewire – the European elit was Black and Colored and ruled from 1500 until 1789. Read his work BLUE BLOOD IS BLACK BLOOD and you will finally understand what I mean. It was the Black European elite together with their Jewish businessmen (they proposed it) that started the so-called “European Slave Trade” to the Americas.
Nimrod is right, blacks ruled the world and still do to this day
So there was NEVER a White elite!!! You are too much brainwashed by the political correct system established by the Jews to keep non-Jews dumb and ignorant. It’s time fore the politically incorrect truth! And again, only 10% of the Africans were kidnapped by the Jewish Portuguese slave traders. The other 90% was done by the Africans themselves. Again, The Europeans couldn’t stand the African climat, illnesses and POWER. You always ignore the FACT that Africans had huge and extremely powerful civilizations. They had TIMBUKTU with superior technology. They had also superior firepower LONG BEFORE the Europeans used it.
Accept it bro, slavery was (and still is) a MAJOR benefit for us Blacks and the Jews.
DON’ T BE AN IDIOT!!!
You also keep whining about those forts build on the African coasts. The African kings ALLOWED the European Jews to build the forts and the Africans HELPED them to build those forts. Get real, please, you fool! The so-called “Atlantic Slave Trade” was big business between the African kings and chieftains and their Jewish clients.
Brazilian, I agree with you. Those Nehesy is really a dunce. He must be a Jew himself to believe and preach all his bullcrap. It were indeed the Jewish Communist and Bolsheviks who owned the White slaves, NOT the Nazis! Nehesy, you’re a naive Holocaust believer, right? The so-called “Holocaust” on the Jews NEVER took place!!! It’s a big Zionist lie to establish a Jewish nation in the Middle-East and to dominate the rest of the world. Sadly fore us the Zionists succeeded in their plans and now rule the world. The Jews that died in German concentration camps died becaus of Thyfus and starvationand NOT because of poison gas. The 6 million myth is a myth in the Jewish Talmud, used BEFORE and AFTER WO I, thus BEFORE WO II.
Oops, I’m sorry fore the typos. I mean that the 6 million myth is a myth from the Jewish Talmud and it’s used BEFORE WW I and BETWEEN WW I and WW II. Oh, and I forgot to mention that NO 6 million Jews died! Only around 570 000 of all the Jews in Europe died during WW II.
Nemrod
Part I
A = my answer.
Let us check and make a logical conclusion again:
* The Black Moors conquered and dominated Europe fore almost 800 years
A : I agree , there was also white berbers among the moors as shwon by the Cantigas of Santa Maria. But Moor = Mauros = Maurus = Maure = a black man( see Jack D Forbes with Europeans’ defintions of the moors from 15th to 18th century) .
* The Moors were much smarter and much more technicly advanced than the White
Europeans
A: I agree
* The Moors established slavery in Europe and enslaved millions of Whites also fore
almost 800 years
A 1 : Muslim moors enslaved millions of Europeans. Who sold these slaves to them ? Europeans (Genoans, Venetians, Franks) and Jews ==> William D philips, Evariste Levi provencal, Charles Verlinden. Who sold the Mamelouks (Turks, Albanians) in Egypt and Saqalibas (slavs) to Muslim spain ?
A 2: You also forgot that during all the Reconquista ( Portuguese and Spaniards taking back their country), they had muslims as prisoners of wars and slaves. Among the first slaves exported to the new world many of them were muslims/moors ( see list in Cuba for instance in “Black Crescent”
* The Moors dominating Europe means dominating the WHOLE WESTERN WORLD
A: I agree, but in all places they lost their dominion they finished as slaves in European markets : Italy , Spain, South of France and Portugal . You can read Gilberto freyre for Portugal, Charles Verlinden , Jacques Heers for Spain
Part II
You forget that many Moors sailed to and inspected the Americas LONG BEFORE Columubus, so they were actually already ruling the Americas.
A 1. Everybody that moors/black and others (scandinavians) discovered the new world before colombus. This is why we had black native indian nations in North America and the west Indies. I found many evidences of black native indians before the spanish came not in Van Sertima but in Pr Pathé Diagne ( references from spanish priests, inquisition forbade those testimonies), José Antonio Saco.
Africans had already reach the new world along with native indians (those coming from Asia from Bering Strait) , sometimes they mixed up, sometimes not.
But of course the Moors also raped and killed millions of White women. The Moors established sex slavery/prostitution in Europe. The Moors also massacred and castrated a lot of White males during their 800 years long rule.
A : BS, European masters raped , killed , established sex prostitution in Antiquity . For Rome and Greece you can consult : Moses Finley, Alexandre Henri Wallon , Paul Allard. For Master/Slave relationship before the moor you can consult Pierre Bonnassie. Many Europeans in Spain actually took islam as their religion since (see Stanley Lane Poole). Even before the Moors the black man had conquered Europe and White women fled to them for their protection, wealth and good behaviour see the French Mystic Fabre D’Olivet…Please give me your references I’ll check by myself…
The Moors were the crual oppressors of Europe, NOT the civilizisers. They used their advanced technology only fore themselves, fore the purpose of BLACK SUPREMACY!!!
A. Please give me your references. They stayed 800 yrs in Europe (France, Italy, Spain, Portuguese) , welcomed in European Royal courts, developped universities with students coming from all PART of Europes and Africa (being African themselves) , yet you dare write this BS. NO OPPRESSOR can submit a people or a continent during 800 yrs !!!
The Moors were racist Black supremacists who wanted to dominate the whole planet, period.
A: Your references please. BS again ! If they wanted black supremacy , Europeans would have stayed in darkness…Moors brought Agriculture, Books, Science, Surgery, Navigation ( no expedition to the new world without their science, and black navigators were among Colombus’ crew : Pedro Alonso Nino was called “El Negro) , philosophy etc
Yes, it’s true that they also held African slaves,
A: They had white berber slaves too (many berber female slaves sent to Arabia) , see Bernard Lewis or Flora Shaw
but during their rule there were much more White slaves than African slaves (they ruled from 7th century until the 15th century). The Moors called themselves proud the Swarty people and their White slaves and subjects disdainful the Ruddy people. Dark skin was a batch of honor and a sign of RACIAL SUPERIORITY, while pale skin was a sign of RACIAL INFERIORITY.
A: True
And in case of the European elite, according to the brilliant Black scholar Egmond Codfried – you can read his works here one Rasta Livewire – the European elit was Black and Colored and ruled from 1500 until 1789. Read his work BLUE BLOOD IS BLACK BLOOD and you will finally understand what I mean. It was the Black European elite together with their Jewish businessmen (they proposed it) that started the so-called “European Slave Trade” to the Americas
A: I saw his posts in another website. I’ll wait for his book to see more clearer. There may have been some black/mulatto/quadroon/octoroons rulers in Europe specially in Great Britain. But La Mauresse de Moret was not the son of Louis XIV, she was the daughter of an african slave called Nabo offered to his queen (NABO).
I all European rulers were blacks , somebody has to explain to me how they dared called their own brethen in Africa, negroes, niggers. Plus Spain, Portugal, France, Spain kingdoms made this wealth out of this African Slave Trade. Anybody should read George SCELLE’s book about African Slave Trade with first hand documents.
Everybody should also read “Traité du Parfait Négociant” by Savary , they described how they attacked african villages to kidnap slaves
Or the first account by Dupuy called ” De la nécéssité de vendre le commerce des nègres aux catholiques Français” in 1452 :
– Africa was a wealthy continent : gold
– Then all their lies to justify the African Slave Trade
One fact is sure though when maroons in North America/South America/West Indies, or Native Indian slaves (some being blacks) in the same areas never told that black men enslaved them. They called them “paled face” not “Dark Face”. Plus when Indians attacked a European fort they would kill everybody white (except Indian and Africans)
Nemrod you’re definitely not a scholar bro (me neither) !!! please keep up your efforts LOL
Your brother
So there was NEVER a White elite!!! You are too much brainwashed by the political correct system established by the Jews to keep non-Jews dumb and ignorant. It’s time fore the politically incorrect truth! And again, only 10% of the Africans were kidnapped by the Jewish Portuguese slave traders. The other 90% was done by the Africans themselves.
A : BS ! Don Pedro Blanco, Domingo Gomez, Lightburn, Faber, Ormond, Vasconcellos ( freemason governor of Angola) , Benjamin Campbell , David lawrence etc,etc. ALL OF THEM were EUROPEANS and had slave factories in Africa and LIVED in Africa(many of them married to african women)…Pombeiros? Tangomaos ? Lançados ? In Dahomey the traitors rulers were protected/supported by EUROPEANS. This is why many of our kings and priests finish as slaves in the new world. Who sold them to Europeans if they were the sellers ?
Once again I ask you to read JR Spears ” American slave trade”.From 1st account testimonies : Europeans would send their men in Africa to sell guns for slave catching enterprise ONLY. If you did not want to participate to this mess, the all tribe was enslaved. IT IS WRITTEN in JR Spears…
Europeans did in Africa what they did in all over the world (including their own continent for centuries ) : Philippines islands, North America, South America ( aztecs were defeated by few spanish and many more native indians), India, Bengale , Canary islands etc, etc : ally with one group (gun and power) to catch/defeat/enslave an other.
Again, The Europeans couldn’t stand the African climat, illnesses and POWER. You always ignore the FACT that Africans had huge and extremely powerful civilizations. They had TIMBUKTU with superior technology. They had also superior firepower LONG BEFORE the Europeans used it.
A. BS for Europeans not living in Africa. How the hell the whites in SOUTH AFRICA or somewhere else (Goree, Whydah , Congo etc) were strong enough to resist and live for centuries (Dutch, English) ? Congo is in central Africa yet portuguese missionaries spread christianity since the 16th century. Angola’s governor were all natives portuguese. You need to read more and stop this falsehood…
A: Mali was destroyed by the moroccan army in the 16 th century because they did not have guns. Moroccan army was led by the spanish eunuch called Djouder Pacha (described as white blue eyed man in Tarikh es Soudan ) and thousand of European mercenaries (english, french, spanish) with guns and canons…. Man to man fight Moroccan would have never destroyed Mali. The black Arabs tried ifew centuries eralier in Makouria twice , and they were beat off badly twice by the african armies: it was a man a man fight…
If we had canons and guns to defend ourselves, the slave trade period would have been very different….
Accept it bro, slavery was (and still is) a MAJOR benefit for us Blacks and the Jews.
A. BS once again….Which benefit for blacks ? Dahomey ? You need to read more man. Dahomey rulers who participated to this mess where supported by Europeans. This is why Toussaint louverture’s father was enslaved in HAITI yet he was part of the Dahomey Royal Family . He tried to resist the slave trade ( as a minister of defence) they kidnapped and sent him as slave in French slave owner Mr Breda’s slave plantation in HAITI or Saint Domingue…
The only benefit of the slave trade has been for europeans :
– Gold
– Diamonds
– Leather
– Palm Oil
– Guns
– Chains
– Boats
– Molasses and Rhum
– Sugar
– Coffee
– Indigo
– Tobacco
– Sell and buy Men/Women/children
– Without the slave trade no industrial revolution in Europe ( Joseph Inikori , Eric Williams)
– All the big europeans fortunes took a boost with the slave trade and other linked activities (cotton , sugar , selling slaves, financing slave boats etc): Rothchilds, JP Morgan, Barclays etc
Peace out !