THE RHESUS FACTOR
WHITE RABBITS, WHITE LIES AND WHITE SUPREMACY (THE TRUTH ABOUT RH NEGATIVE BLOOD)
There are four Blood types within the ABO
Groupings:
A, B, AB, AND O.
Alongside of the four Blood Types there is a Rhesus(Rh) Factor which further divides the Blood Types into Positive(+) and Negative(-) classifications.
With this understanding the four types are now listed in 8 divisions:
A+, A-, B+, B-, AB+, AB-,O+,O-
The Rhesus Factor is that which determines if a Blood Type is Positive or Negative.
To understand the Rhesus Factor we have to understand the disease HDN (Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn).
It was medical research that sought to obtain a greater understanding of HDN that led to the emergence of the Rhesus Factor.
HDN is a reactionary disease in which an Rh Negative Mother rejects her Rh Positive Fetus by instictively attacking the red blood cells of the Fetus. In agglutinating the red blood cells the pregnancy often results in miscarriage or Still born births.
HDN is very rare in Non- White populations since Rh Negative Blood is a rare occurence amongst Non-Whites as well. Amongst White woman 1 in 10 pregnancies consist of a Rhesus Negative Mother and a Rhesus Positive baby.
The first known occurance of HDN is a documentation from a Medical record in 1609 in which a Mother of twins in France experienced what appeared to be Hemolytic Disease of the New born(HDN).
However the turning point towards our modern day understanding took place in 1939 when Levine and Stetson reported the case of a Stillborn birth. The Mother had received a blood transfusion from her husband and her Serum agglutinated her husband’s red blood cells and those of 80% of compatible donors.
This case inspired the groundbreaking research of 1940,conducted by Landsteiner and Weiner. In a laboratory Test, red blood cells from a Rhesus (Rh) Monkey were injected into a Rabbit.The Rabbit Serum agglutinated the Rhesus Monkey’s red blood cells and 85% of human red blood cells as well. The Rabbit Serum(antibody) was called ” Anti Rh “.The Rabbit Serum had an identical response to agglutinating red blood cells as that of the Serum produced by the Mothers in the cases of HDN(Hemolytic Disease of the New born).
Those whose red blood cells were agglutinated by the Rabbit Serum were labeled Rh (Rhesus) Positive meaning that the Rabbit Serum responds to this type of blood in a similar manner to which it responded to the blood of the Rhesus Monkey.This became the basis for the Rh Positive blood types.
Those whose red blood cells did not agglutinate when coming in contact with the Rabbit Serum were considered to be Rh(Rhesus) Negative meaning that the Rabbit Serum did not react to their blood in the same manner that it reacted to the Rhesus Monkey. This became the basis for the Negative blood types.
Interestingly, those who have Rh Negative blood have the ability to produce ” Rabbit Serum”.This is why a Mother with Rh Negative Blood will agglutinate the red blood cells of a Rh Positive Newborn in the same exact manner of the Rabbit Serum. In this regard the Rabbit Serum was labeled Rabbit Anti Rh, while the same identical Serum found in humans was called Human Anti Rh. This was the result of intensive comparative testing which took place in 1941and found that the Rabbit and Human Serum were identical.
There is a very logical reason why Rh Negative individuals who are almost exclusively from the White race are able to produce Rabbit Serum. However in order to draw attention away from the Rabbit Serum producing phenomenon the research shifted its focus to the supposed similarity between those who have Rh Positive blood and the Rhesus Monkey.
The reported commonality between Rh Positive human blood and that of the Rhesus Monkey was the presence of Antigen D which appears on the red blood cells in both the humans and the monkeys. However Antigen D is not present in those humans who are Rh Negative. This discovery led to many tales, rumors,and theories about the relationship between Rh Positive and Rh Negative humans. There were those within the Rh Negative camp that boasted of being uniquely unrelated to Simians while identifying Rh Positive humans as being those who were spawned by gorillas. This entire theory proved ridiculous as all humans including those who are Rh Negative are 98% genetically identical to Gorillas and Chimpanzees. The absence of the D Antigen is not going to make a bit of
difference in determining whether one is related
to the Gorilla or not.
By nature White Supremacy could not help but take advantage of another opportunity to deceive, since those classified as Rh Negative are almost entirely comprised of members of the White Race. The following is a racial breakdown of those with Rh Negative blood:
1. Whites 15%
2. African-Americans 7%( Largely due to admixture with Whites)
3. African descent 3%
4. Native-Americans 1%
5. Asians 0.3%
As mentioned above human DNA is 98% identical to the Gorilla and the Chimpanzee.Therefore the absence of Antigen D is not going to make the slightest difference in proving that one is not related to the Gorilla in comparison to others who share the commonality of Antigen D with the Gorillla. The deceptive propaganda attempted to use Rh Negative results to promote White Supremacy ideologies which identified Non-Whites as having ” Gorilla DNA “,while at the same time claiming that the Original White Race was Rh Negative and therefore unrelated to the Simian Family.
All of this of course being a distraction to deviate focus from the Phenomenon that Rh Negative humans were able to create an identical Serum to that of the Rabbit. In a greater attempt to obstruct or discourage focus Levine suddenly claimed in 1963 that Anti Rh human was somehow different than Anti Rh Rabbit Serum. He even ridiculously claimed that Rabbit Serum now responded the same to Rh Positive and Rh Negative blood samples.
If this was the case then it would not be the commonality of Antigen D that was causing the Rabbit Serum to respond the same to Rh Positive humans and the Rhesus Monkey, as Rh Negative humans did not produce Antigen D. It would further undermine the entire basis for establishing Positive and Negative blood types as Rh Positive was based on the similar response that the Rabbit Serum had in agglutinating the red blood cells of the Rhesus Monkey and the red blood cells of those humans who are now classified as Rh Positive.
If the Rabbit Serum agglutinated the red blood cells of those now classified as Rh Negative then there would be no distinguishing factor being that the absence of Antigen D would now be irrelevant to the response of the Rabbit Serum. It was the fact that the Rabbit Serum did not Agglutinate the red blood cells of those with Rh Negative blood that formed the distinction and basis for establishing the Rh Negative classification in the first place. In order to seal the cover up Rabbit Anti Rh was now renamed Anti LW in honor of Landsteiner and Weiner.
In understanding the fact that Rh Negative individuals have the ability to produce Rabbit Serum will now serve as the introduction for the greater understanding about
how this actually came to be. The highest percentage of Rh Negative blood is found in Spain amongst the ethnic Basque population.The name Spain derives from the Phoenician word Ispahan meaning the “Land of the Rabbits”. This name is related to the Hebrew Saphan/Safan which likewise means Rabbit. The Spanish word for Rabbit derives from the Basque language as the Basques were the original inheritors of the ” Land of the Rabbits”.
The European association and attachment to the Rabbit is alarming. Until very recently it was a very popular tradition in England that on the 1st of each and every month one would have to say: ” Rabbit,Rabbit, Rabbit!”
three times. This was a way of assuring Good luck for the remainder of the month.This tradition carried over into the United States. There is documentation that President Roosevelt confessed to a friend that on the 1st of every month he says Rabbits!
In English speaking countries including the United States it was very common to carry a Rabbit’s foot for Good Luck. This tradition is believed to be motivated by the fact that the Rabbit is highy fertile and in this regard its body parts were seen as a sign of Goodluck.
The foot at one time was considered to be a Phallic symbol and an inspiring amulet to encourage or enhace fertility. The association between the Rabbit and fertility was the main reason why the Rabbit became a symbol for the Spring Season and was further associated with the Easter Egg.
The European obsession with the Rabbit as a symbol of fertility led to some very strange rituals which must have included the consumption and absorption of large quantities of Rabbit fluids in hope of obtaining fertility. The inappropriate contact and consumption of Rabbit fluids on a continual and generational basis gradually caused mutations to occur in relation to Antigen D.
In certain lineages Antigen D could no longer be produced as the mutation disabled both copies of the RHD gene, while in other lineages it caused one copy to become non functional. In the case of the latter the one functioning copy was able to produce Antigen D and thus being classified as Rh Positive. This condition of having one non functioning copy of the RHD gene is known as RHD Silent Allele.
The deviant consumption of large amounts of Rabbit fluids over several generations would have been enough to permanently alter the genetic composition of 60% of the White Race. 15% of the White race was effected to the point of not being able to produce Antigen D at all,while another 45% suffers from RHD Silent Allele.
Over the centuries segments of the White Race have been gradually mutating as a result of inappropriate consumption of Rabbit fluids that have altered and eliminated the function and existence of Antigen D which has effected 60% of the White population. In some cases the RH Negative blood type is more compatible to the Rabbit than other human beings.
In this regard they logically use Rabbit experimentation for their own benefit in trying to understand their own
genetically mutated bodies. When the White Scientists needed an answer to HDN they immediately understood the need to access an “experimental” Rabbit.
The first transfer of embryos took place in 1890
as a number of Rabbit embryos were successfully
transplanted to another female Rabbit carrier.
In 2006, CNN reported that British scientists are seeking permission to create hybrid embryos by fusing human cells with Rabbit eggs. Legal experts say that it is not clear whether the embryos would be regarded as Rabbit or human.
There are serious plans for the use of Rabbits for the colonization of Mars:
THE ULTIMATE DONOR?
Within the 8 Blood Type Groupings O Negative has been labeled the Ultimate Donor because all other Blood Types can receive transfusions from this Blood Type without rejection or consequences of any sort. The Rh Negative is not the basis for the Ultimate Donor but it is rather Blood Type O in general that provides the nucleus for the Ultimate Donor. This becomes perfectly clear when we divide and analyse the two elements which comprise the Ultimate Donor. These elements are the O Blood Type and the Negative Rhesus Factor.
It is only the Rh Negative Factor accompanied by the Blood Type O that defines the Ultimate Donor. All others such as A Negative, B Negative, and AB Negative do not exhibit any capability in this regard. However Blood Type O with Rh Positive status serves as an Ultimate Donor for all other Blood Types which are RH Positive. This indicates that the significance in the Ultimate Donor Status lies within the O Blood Type and not within the Rhesus Factor. This obviously has something to do with the fact that the majority of people in all races belong to Blood Type O.
Now that it has been established that O Positive acts as an Ultimate Donor for all Rh Positive Blood Types and O Negative acts as an Ultimate Donor for all Rh Negative Blood Types it leaves us only to determine why O Negative can give to all Rh Positive Blood Types,and O Positive cannot donate to any Rh Negative Blood Types.
The answer to this lies in understanding the nature of the mutation and defect that constitutes Rh Negative Blood. Those with Rh Negative Blood produce a Rabbit Serum that agglutinates the Red Blood Cells that are found amongst those with Rh Positive Blood Types and therefore one with Rh Negative Blood cannot receive blood from Rh Positive donors. In this regard that which is an unnatural mutation and genetical defect (Rh Negative) cannot receive that which is most natural to human creation (Rh Positive). This is the very nature of the defect which is Rh Negative. Rh Negative is characterized by one who has two defective copies of the RHD Gene rendering the individual incapable of producing Antigen D. Others who have been effected by the mutation and have one functioning copy and one defective copy of the RHD Gene suffer from what is known as RHD Silent Allele. Rh Negative is a genetical defect not a sign of genetical superiority.
WHY IS IT THAT NEGATIVE BLOOD CANNOT BE CLONED?
Negative blood simply means that an individual has a genetical defect in which both copies of the RHD Gene are not able to produce Antigen D. By the nature of creation genetical defects are often limited by a natural inability to reproduce. Even though cloning may be an unnatural process it success relies on the natural ability of cells to reproduce. Being that RH Negative blood is a genetical defect its ability to reproduce is limited by nature.
RABBITS AND THE BASQUES
As stated earlier the Basque people of Spain who are aboriginal to the Iberian Peninsula have the highest concentration of RH Negative Blood. This is O Negative to be specific. The following link explains how to this day Rabbit is a major part of the Basque Cuisine. It also mentions some of the sacred Rabbit traditions that are a part of their heritage. The name Spain itself means ” The Land of Rabbits “. The Rh Negative MUTATION or DEFECT was caused by a continuous generational intake of Rabbit fluids.
The tradition of the Rabbit became so powerful in Europe that the symbol of three hares came to represent the Church and the Trinity. The link below exhibits the importance of the Rabbit icon in relation to the European Churches:
Debunking the White Supremacy Myth of Rh Negative Blood.
1. Rh Positive people evolved from Simians because it is proven that they are related to the Rhesus Monkey, while Rh Negative people are non-evolutionary beings. FALSE
Science has not proven that Rh Positive individuals are anymore or less related to the Rhesus Monkey or any other type of Simian than those with Rh Negative Blood. Rh Positive Blood simply means that your body is normal and healthy in regards to its ability to produce Antigen D,while those with Rh Negative Blood suffer from a mutation and genetical defect which results in the dysfunction of RHD Genes. Yes the Rhesus Monkey also produces Antigen D which is one of many commonalities that are shared by Primates of all sorts. Humans have tongues and Monkeys have tongues. Can you imagine a person born with a birth defect which resulted in this individual not having a tongue. claiming that he has less in common with Simians because of this defect, while at the same time accusing humans born with tongues as being related to the Monkey because of this shared commonality.
2. O Negative Blood is the most superior because it is the Ultimate Donor. FALSE
By nature Blood Type O is the Ultimate Donor it is not the Rhesus Factor which gives it this status.
3. Rh Negative Blood is superior because it can’t be cloned FALSE
Nature has a way of limiting that which is defective. Although cloning itself is an unnatural process it is based on the natural ability of cells to reproduce and multiply. In this way nature has limited the ability to reproduce that which is defective and therefore Rh Negative blood cannot be cloned.
4. The White Race is Superior because they have the highest percentage of Rh Negative Blood: FALSE
Rh Negative blood is a genetical defect and a mutation. 15% of Whites have two defective copies of the RHD Gene which results in their inability to produce Antigen D. Another 45% of Whites suffer from one defective RHD Gene. Those of the latter classification have one defective RHD Gene and one functioning RHD Gene. In this setting the one functioning copy produces Antigen D and therefore they are classified as Rh Positive. However they are living evidence as to the evolutionary process of the mutation that disproportionately plagues the White Race.
All humans are 98% genetically identical to Gorillas and Chimpanzees. Having defective RHD Genes does not make any difference in proving or disproving that one is superior in regards to the theories of evolution.
AB is the only blood type not found amongst gorillas. AB Positive is the ultimate recipent it can generate life from all blood types. However no one can receive AB Positive Blood and live. Within the plasma of the AB Positive Blood is a gift called liquid gold which everyone can receive. It is used to fight off infections. AB POSITIVE is the BLOOD type found on the Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium face cloth. It is the blood type of Jesus Christ.
By
(AMIR) ISHAQ D. AL-SULAIMANI
Great article and I hope many non-Caucasians read and understand what you’re saying.
Another fact that’s really gonna surprise them is that the RHD or Rh+ gene, the most potent or highly immunogenic is the most recent duplication. Seems to me like Mother Nature had already decided she wanted her human creation on a different genetic path to their primate ancestors while we were still on the continent; and begs the question: Why did what seems like a genetic dead-end (for homo-sapiens at least) become re-integrated into the human genome?
http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/99/6/2272.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gv/mhc/xslcgi.cgi?cmd=bgmut/orthologs_rh
Jesus christ never existed. Your entire article lacks credibility with this nonsense. the shroud is a fake.
I’m a RH negative (O negative) black woman. Eveeytime I try to research this I get a bunch of white supremacist views and nothing relating to me. I hope the truth comes out one day.
Stupid, so my family eat a lot or rabbits and rh + ate a lot of monkeys lol the shroud has been proven fake and not old enough. It’s a picture made with the sun and camera type device. It’s not even blood.
Interesting article at first until it becomes clear that there is a reverse superiority bias, and the language that describes consuming rabbits as somehow unnatural or perverse–at that point scientific logic goes out the window and then it becomes one racial supremacy against another.
Most open minded people of any race accept the commonality of all humans. It is the prejudiced people that wish to pit cultures against one another. So this diatribe ends up sounding as biased as any white supremacy BS. You don’t fight hate with hate. In my experience I would guess that most races have an equal amount of prejudice against other races. Each race has had slavery and wars with other cultures. Each race has dietary preferences based on their culture.
Some Africans consume cow blood. Asians like dog meat, raw fish and sea urchin eggs among other oddities. Arabs eat camel products. Some primitive tribes eat insects & monkeys. Caucasians eat horse meat, foi gras, caviar & veal. Each race/culture has their own cultural oddities. I suppose I left out cannibalism in some primitive cultures. Eating rabbit, which most cultures do, is irrelevant.
You have failed to make your point while otherwise attempting to be scientific, unfortunately letting politics interfere. Drop the racial stereotyping, it doesn’t work in any context. Eating rabbit might affect DNA and evolution in some regard, just like any foods do. I suppose you could extend your logic as to why Caucasians have the genetically based enzymes to digest lactose while other don’t, same with gluten. Yes people adapt to their environments and what foods are in abundance.
I agree with you Scott. I was really starting to like this article because it gives Rh negatives a reality check, but then it closed with this “We’re actually better” garbage that just sounds equally ego-driven. I’m Rh negative, but I don’t think I’m better than anyone else. A little part of me, I’m afraid, does like to think I have special DNA or that I come from an alien race, but that’s my dirty ego. Anyway, I give a thumbs down to this author for such immature reporting.
you and Scott sound racist . there are a lot of white people who believe that they are better . Because rh negative factor. they even posted supremacists all over the web page and Internet if you read
Ma’am, you apparently did not read their comments. They said they enjoyed the article UNTIL IT became racist.
I thought his comments were the best ive seen on the internet regarding this matter. And im a white Caucasian. Entertaining and exact. Who are you whites there to judge his work, like grandiose supremacy judging what and what cant be said. I think you should either read it or leave it, and if you have nothing good to say piss off as we say in Australia.
Scott your statement sounds racist to me
every time I go on the Internet to Google about RH negativ blood. I get tons or white people saying that they are RH negative and have blue eyes in green eyes and red hair and how they are more superior than others because they r RH negative. now if that’s not racism what is folks?
Agreed this guy is psycho. He is the ONLY troll on the web trying to change all the facts that REAL scientists, who can spell, have found regarding the RH(-) and RH(+). By the way AMIR ISHAQ D. AL-SULAIMANI, “Genetical” is not a word, and proves right there you know nothing of genetics. Notice how he comes up with all these unheard of “facts” about rabbits and RH(-) and then says they”must have” eaten a ton of their serum to start producing rabbit serum. First of all, Amir, the Basques are the Euro subgroup of rh(-). There are rh(-)s that originated in the Arctic, some in the tropics which produce different subgroups than the euro group. Secondly just because someone eats an animal does not mean they become like them. The truth is, that an RH(+) person like Amir is never going to be able to truly grasp the difference between the two types, because he is not one of us. Therefore he cannot oversee without bias the true differences. These differences are such that RH(-) has high IQ, higher spirituality, connection to the universal laws/physics, psychic ability, searchers of the unknown, gifted/ talented, different physical characteristics….etc. How can you truly explain to someone who has ZERO psychic ability, how it feels to be psychic–and to have them BELIEVE you? NO ONE, monkey or rabbit, can believe something they cannot experience. RH (-) can identify with all sorts of psychic and spiritual encounters even if they didn’t HAVE them, because they know what it is like to be psychic. RH(-)s are the open minds of the world, the creators, the inventors who think outside the box…We are also the ostracized and ridiculed for the same behavior.
I am not racist, nor do I think that one blood type is better than the other. However, I do have an issue with some of the comments you made about Rh- people being more spiritual and having clairvoyance, etc. I am AB+ and have had many spiritual experiences. I have thought something and then someone would turn around and say what I was just thinking. I have dreams about things that actually happen without me ever being foretold. I was taken to other places in the cosmos by aliens. I have more intuition than I give myself credit for. Most of the time I don’t share because people don’t always understand. If we all come from the same primordial source then having different blood types, positive or negative, doesn’t matter.
Hi Mary, I was reading various things on line about A-RH- blood, I am part of the 1%, As I am Cherokee Indian. I have read the details on the monkeys, but this is the first time that I’ve heard about the rabbits ever. Also something I’ve noted about these articles, they mostly omit the fact that A blood type people don’t handle animal fats well within the diet, but do better with fruits and vegetables. I find that true from my own diet, after going from a Palio type diet, to more fruits and vegetables. Do you guys who have A- blood also find this the case? Just curious.
Personally after being on a more plant based diet (I still eat some meats me its very few and not as often), I can honestly say I do feel and look a lot better since eating more fruits and vegetables.
Entire books have been written about this. Check out The Blood Type Diet by Dr. D’Adamo.
Animals fats are hard on any human, your blood type has nothing to do w it. We are meant to eat fruits and vegetables, our bodies need them to survive, we don’t need animal meat and fats.
The best comment I have read so far. Thank you! I feel at home. I am R H Negative, African American. I have so many ideas, inventions, etc, until I can’t process them all. i am often ridiculed and ostracized. What you have said is the absolute truth.
I am RH blood type also. I’m African American as well. I have dark hair, lightish skin and dark brown eyes. I’ve had dreams of the spirit world as if I left my body and was transported somewhere else. I also had very specific dreams and they will come to existence. I’m a very creative person, multi talented in music and arts. I very rarely get sick. My immune system is VERY strong. As awesome as that sounds I have a small for of A.D.D. I can’t fully focus like I want to and I believe I have a very mild case of dyslexia. Smart but I have flaws.
vaccinations are prob the flaw source.
I agree with you
bravo to the comment section…wonderfully put …thats all I was going to say…so yes , other than being racially bias …and somewhat ignorant (as we all can be!) very interesting. I just wish you had toned down the anger and led more with curiosity . oh and I heard jesuss blood was ab negative..not positive.
I agree sounded very biased, and I imagine this is coming from a person that is rh positive. Now if this is coming indeed from an individual who is rh negative, would give u maybe an xtra mutated defect to stand on, not saying that it is totally irrelevant; however how do you account for the research that claims that rh negative humans are not susceptible to many viruses like HIV, also many similar character traits of hightened senses, and supernatural occurrences, I am not white, not even half but I am O- and I feel more cursed than blessed at times with clairvoyance and other factors if it being a little more complicated to procreate. Might do more research!
so you don’t believe that these white people that are using their eye color and their hair color as a mean of superiority isn’t being racist? well they are
Tara, I also read that the blood type found on the Shroud of Turin was AB negative . This author twists a lot of information around to suit his agenda.
I’m A- and my whole thing is the government should keep it real.If we the negative type cant carry our own child something is wrong. .I believe the positive blood type was the defect..I want the truth i living proof that ppl with negative blood types are truly different shit can’t be cloned explain that!
I too am A Rh negative and African American and had actually been looking for a rebuttal to the “RH negative blood of the Gods theory” but as I started reading I realized that the author and rightfully so was trying to stick it to white supremacy, but when he started talking about the consumption of rabbit meat and I assume feces and rabbit urine were the culprit for the blood mutation, HE LOST ME!!!!! I’m almost thinking that he’s AB+ because he alluded to some specialty with its type while RH negative blood in his eyes is actually RED PISS???????
I am African America with RH negative factor blood. I have black hair and dark brown eyes. I have experienced psychic dreams, etc. I thought this article would speak more to african americans with this type of blood. But seems I was wrong. The author completely lost me when he started talking about white people with blue eyes, rabbits, and monkeys??? There are african americans with this RH factor, and I hope to connect with them through this comment, not just based on white people There has to be another answer.
Well my race is a mixed race mainly African American but mixed with Italian and Asian. Still RH blood
I’m an African American woman who is RH negative as well. O negative to be exact. I was hoping this article would touch more on my own race but I learned absolutely nothing
The biggest mistake that people make is to analyze what the rh blood type might mean while assuming that there is even such thing as race. THERE IS SUCH THING IN SCIENCE AS RACE BASED ON THE COLOR OF YOUR SKIN, IT IS PURELY A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT. Just take any basic anthropology, sociology, or biology course and you will learn this. Skin color is independent of blood type. People of different skin colors can have the same blood type and genetic markers and people of the same skin color can have different blood types and genetic markers, so these factors are independent of each other. With that being said, rh negative people do report similar qualities. It is just not skin color that is linked to this allele it seems. In fact, the most popular physical features that I have found reported by rh negatives is red or dark hair with tints of red, and green eyes. Since the white supremecists seem to also proclaim that the “pure race” has blonde hair and blue eyes, I don’t know how anyone buys their bullshit. If the rh negative people are the supreme race, it is not them, sinice one major quality of rh negative blood seems to be extreme empathy and caring about their fellow man? Also, the authors argument here would make more sense if he tried to associate the rabbit serum with descending from a rabbit, not from drinking rabbit serum, considering mutations don’t work like that. It seems the whatever side you are on (rh positive or rh negative), the argument goes to one being “special” or better than the other. Why can’t people just be different but equally good?
He meant rabbit blood.
His last point is what gives it away as he is reaching too far and just countering the other side of the supremacists, and which makes the rest of the work questionable, is that he says Jesus was +AB, while everyone claims its -AB, regardless of it being a myth at least he should try to get the factoid right.
every time I google the Internet in search of information about RH negative blood type I am always getting bias people saying that there are rh negative and they are white with green eyes and blue eyes and how they are so much smarter than everybody else. yes that’s not racism what is
I dont think its racist, it’s a fact, it’s been tested that people w negative blood types have higher IQs, it doesn’t make them better then any other race or blood type. It’s just that they are testing higher then those w a positive blood type.
This article seems a bit overly biased and some of the ideas far-fetched. I am A- negative and do not believe I can ride around on magical dragons or have magical powers, or that I am somehow more or less “defective” than anyone else.
A decent amount of this info jives with what I have looked into so far, such as the fact that Rh negatives are also related to simians. I do not believe that any being is superior to another, beings evolve through random mutations that happen to work in certain environments. However, consumption of rabbit fluids has absolutely nothing to do with a higher percentage of Rh negative blood types in some of those with some non-African lineage. Neanderthals were mainly O-, and records show that they consumed larger mammals. The Basque territory in Spain is very close to the area where most of the last full-blood Neanderthals were believed to have lived. Euskera, the language spoken by Basques which can’t be rooted in any other known languages, has nothing to do with rabbits. The fact that many people with some non-African lineage, especially the Basque, have different physical traits which more resemble the Neanderthals, debunks the rabbit theory. Many Rh negative and O blood types also have adverse reactions to newer foods to humanity, such as grains (like wheat).
Neanderthals tended to lean more toward the matriarchal side, as women performed many of the same duties of men, such as hunting very large mammals at close range. Most but not all Sapiens have tended to form more patriarchal (male-dominated) society in which infanticide was common. These groups tended to expand rapidly throughout the lands, partly because of the fact that Africa was lush with many resources, until large game was becoming scarce. It took thousands of years of expansion out of Africa for the Sapiens to successfully spread into Neanderthal territory. Many large species like the Mammoth did not become extinct until after Sapiens (such as Cro Magnon) expanded into Europe and Russia. They probably eventually grossly outnumbered Neanderthals, and interbreeding of blood and cultures (along with the advent of agriculture) helped the new hybrids to live more successfully in the colder environments. Because of the environment that Neanderthals lived in, they evolved in a different direction to be shorter in stature than Sapiens, with arms averaging 2X stronger than the average Sapien’s, among other differences. Their brain structures indicate they were generally more visually oriented. They made music (evidence being excavation of a flute made of bear bone at a Neanderthal site, which played the note scale which is the basis of much European music), buried the dead with flowers and such, used feathers, shells, and dyes like red ocre for artistic or symbolic expression and possibly body art, and they took care of their elders and used herbs to help with healing of wounds from hunting.
We can’t call Neanderthal’s brutish idiots anymore than we can call Sapiens the same thing. How else could a hominid live in such harsh environment for over 60,000 years, if they didn’t know their shit? The fact that Neanderthal populations were so low and declining wasn’t an indication of inferiority, they were just in the wrong place at the wrong FREEZING time. The same goes for Sapiens; one Sapien is not aware nor responsible for the fact that Sapiens have a track record of overpopulation and hunting animals to extinction. Not all that is Homo sapien is bad, and not all that is Homo neanderthalensis is bad, and not all that is Homo denisovian is bad!