THE RHESUS FACTOR
WHITE RABBITS, WHITE LIES AND WHITE SUPREMACY (THE TRUTH ABOUT RH NEGATIVE BLOOD)
There are four Blood types within the ABO
Groupings:
A, B, AB, AND O.
Alongside of the four Blood Types there is a Rhesus(Rh) Factor which further divides the Blood Types into Positive(+) and Negative(-) classifications.
With this understanding the four types are now listed in 8 divisions:
A+, A-, B+, B-, AB+, AB-,O+,O-
The Rhesus Factor is that which determines if a Blood Type is Positive or Negative.
To understand the Rhesus Factor we have to understand the disease HDN (Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn).
It was medical research that sought to obtain a greater understanding of HDN that led to the emergence of the Rhesus Factor.
HDN is a reactionary disease in which an Rh Negative Mother rejects her Rh Positive Fetus by instictively attacking the red blood cells of the Fetus. In agglutinating the red blood cells the pregnancy often results in miscarriage or Still born births.
HDN is very rare in Non- White populations since Rh Negative Blood is a rare occurence amongst Non-Whites as well. Amongst White woman 1 in 10 pregnancies consist of a Rhesus Negative Mother and a Rhesus Positive baby.
The first known occurance of HDN is a documentation from a Medical record in 1609 in which a Mother of twins in France experienced what appeared to be Hemolytic Disease of the New born(HDN).
However the turning point towards our modern day understanding took place in 1939 when Levine and Stetson reported the case of a Stillborn birth. The Mother had received a blood transfusion from her husband and her Serum agglutinated her husband’s red blood cells and those of 80% of compatible donors.
This case inspired the groundbreaking research of 1940,conducted by Landsteiner and Weiner. In a laboratory Test, red blood cells from a Rhesus (Rh) Monkey were injected into a Rabbit.The Rabbit Serum agglutinated the Rhesus Monkey’s red blood cells and 85% of human red blood cells as well. The Rabbit Serum(antibody) was called ” Anti Rh “.The Rabbit Serum had an identical response to agglutinating red blood cells as that of the Serum produced by the Mothers in the cases of HDN(Hemolytic Disease of the New born).
Those whose red blood cells were agglutinated by the Rabbit Serum were labeled Rh (Rhesus) Positive meaning that the Rabbit Serum responds to this type of blood in a similar manner to which it responded to the blood of the Rhesus Monkey.This became the basis for the Rh Positive blood types.
Those whose red blood cells did not agglutinate when coming in contact with the Rabbit Serum were considered to be Rh(Rhesus) Negative meaning that the Rabbit Serum did not react to their blood in the same manner that it reacted to the Rhesus Monkey. This became the basis for the Negative blood types.
Interestingly, those who have Rh Negative blood have the ability to produce ” Rabbit Serum”.This is why a Mother with Rh Negative Blood will agglutinate the red blood cells of a Rh Positive Newborn in the same exact manner of the Rabbit Serum. In this regard the Rabbit Serum was labeled Rabbit Anti Rh, while the same identical Serum found in humans was called Human Anti Rh. This was the result of intensive comparative testing which took place in 1941and found that the Rabbit and Human Serum were identical.
There is a very logical reason why Rh Negative individuals who are almost exclusively from the White race are able to produce Rabbit Serum. However in order to draw attention away from the Rabbit Serum producing phenomenon the research shifted its focus to the supposed similarity between those who have Rh Positive blood and the Rhesus Monkey.
The reported commonality between Rh Positive human blood and that of the Rhesus Monkey was the presence of Antigen D which appears on the red blood cells in both the humans and the monkeys. However Antigen D is not present in those humans who are Rh Negative. This discovery led to many tales, rumors,and theories about the relationship between Rh Positive and Rh Negative humans. There were those within the Rh Negative camp that boasted of being uniquely unrelated to Simians while identifying Rh Positive humans as being those who were spawned by gorillas. This entire theory proved ridiculous as all humans including those who are Rh Negative are 98% genetically identical to Gorillas and Chimpanzees. The absence of the D Antigen is not going to make a bit of
difference in determining whether one is related
to the Gorilla or not.
By nature White Supremacy could not help but take advantage of another opportunity to deceive, since those classified as Rh Negative are almost entirely comprised of members of the White Race. The following is a racial breakdown of those with Rh Negative blood:
1. Whites 15%
2. African-Americans 7%( Largely due to admixture with Whites)
3. African descent 3%
4. Native-Americans 1%
5. Asians 0.3%
As mentioned above human DNA is 98% identical to the Gorilla and the Chimpanzee.Therefore the absence of Antigen D is not going to make the slightest difference in proving that one is not related to the Gorilla in comparison to others who share the commonality of Antigen D with the Gorillla. The deceptive propaganda attempted to use Rh Negative results to promote White Supremacy ideologies which identified Non-Whites as having ” Gorilla DNA “,while at the same time claiming that the Original White Race was Rh Negative and therefore unrelated to the Simian Family.
All of this of course being a distraction to deviate focus from the Phenomenon that Rh Negative humans were able to create an identical Serum to that of the Rabbit. In a greater attempt to obstruct or discourage focus Levine suddenly claimed in 1963 that Anti Rh human was somehow different than Anti Rh Rabbit Serum. He even ridiculously claimed that Rabbit Serum now responded the same to Rh Positive and Rh Negative blood samples.
If this was the case then it would not be the commonality of Antigen D that was causing the Rabbit Serum to respond the same to Rh Positive humans and the Rhesus Monkey, as Rh Negative humans did not produce Antigen D. It would further undermine the entire basis for establishing Positive and Negative blood types as Rh Positive was based on the similar response that the Rabbit Serum had in agglutinating the red blood cells of the Rhesus Monkey and the red blood cells of those humans who are now classified as Rh Positive.
If the Rabbit Serum agglutinated the red blood cells of those now classified as Rh Negative then there would be no distinguishing factor being that the absence of Antigen D would now be irrelevant to the response of the Rabbit Serum. It was the fact that the Rabbit Serum did not Agglutinate the red blood cells of those with Rh Negative blood that formed the distinction and basis for establishing the Rh Negative classification in the first place. In order to seal the cover up Rabbit Anti Rh was now renamed Anti LW in honor of Landsteiner and Weiner.
In understanding the fact that Rh Negative individuals have the ability to produce Rabbit Serum will now serve as the introduction for the greater understanding about
how this actually came to be. The highest percentage of Rh Negative blood is found in Spain amongst the ethnic Basque population.The name Spain derives from the Phoenician word Ispahan meaning the “Land of the Rabbits”. This name is related to the Hebrew Saphan/Safan which likewise means Rabbit. The Spanish word for Rabbit derives from the Basque language as the Basques were the original inheritors of the ” Land of the Rabbits”.
The European association and attachment to the Rabbit is alarming. Until very recently it was a very popular tradition in England that on the 1st of each and every month one would have to say: ” Rabbit,Rabbit, Rabbit!”
three times. This was a way of assuring Good luck for the remainder of the month.This tradition carried over into the United States. There is documentation that President Roosevelt confessed to a friend that on the 1st of every month he says Rabbits!
In English speaking countries including the United States it was very common to carry a Rabbit’s foot for Good Luck. This tradition is believed to be motivated by the fact that the Rabbit is highy fertile and in this regard its body parts were seen as a sign of Goodluck.
The foot at one time was considered to be a Phallic symbol and an inspiring amulet to encourage or enhace fertility. The association between the Rabbit and fertility was the main reason why the Rabbit became a symbol for the Spring Season and was further associated with the Easter Egg.
The European obsession with the Rabbit as a symbol of fertility led to some very strange rituals which must have included the consumption and absorption of large quantities of Rabbit fluids in hope of obtaining fertility. The inappropriate contact and consumption of Rabbit fluids on a continual and generational basis gradually caused mutations to occur in relation to Antigen D.
In certain lineages Antigen D could no longer be produced as the mutation disabled both copies of the RHD gene, while in other lineages it caused one copy to become non functional. In the case of the latter the one functioning copy was able to produce Antigen D and thus being classified as Rh Positive. This condition of having one non functioning copy of the RHD gene is known as RHD Silent Allele.
The deviant consumption of large amounts of Rabbit fluids over several generations would have been enough to permanently alter the genetic composition of 60% of the White Race. 15% of the White race was effected to the point of not being able to produce Antigen D at all,while another 45% suffers from RHD Silent Allele.
Over the centuries segments of the White Race have been gradually mutating as a result of inappropriate consumption of Rabbit fluids that have altered and eliminated the function and existence of Antigen D which has effected 60% of the White population. In some cases the RH Negative blood type is more compatible to the Rabbit than other human beings.
In this regard they logically use Rabbit experimentation for their own benefit in trying to understand their own
genetically mutated bodies. When the White Scientists needed an answer to HDN they immediately understood the need to access an “experimental” Rabbit.
The first transfer of embryos took place in 1890
as a number of Rabbit embryos were successfully
transplanted to another female Rabbit carrier.
In 2006, CNN reported that British scientists are seeking permission to create hybrid embryos by fusing human cells with Rabbit eggs. Legal experts say that it is not clear whether the embryos would be regarded as Rabbit or human.
There are serious plans for the use of Rabbits for the colonization of Mars:
THE ULTIMATE DONOR?
Within the 8 Blood Type Groupings O Negative has been labeled the Ultimate Donor because all other Blood Types can receive transfusions from this Blood Type without rejection or consequences of any sort. The Rh Negative is not the basis for the Ultimate Donor but it is rather Blood Type O in general that provides the nucleus for the Ultimate Donor. This becomes perfectly clear when we divide and analyse the two elements which comprise the Ultimate Donor. These elements are the O Blood Type and the Negative Rhesus Factor.
It is only the Rh Negative Factor accompanied by the Blood Type O that defines the Ultimate Donor. All others such as A Negative, B Negative, and AB Negative do not exhibit any capability in this regard. However Blood Type O with Rh Positive status serves as an Ultimate Donor for all other Blood Types which are RH Positive. This indicates that the significance in the Ultimate Donor Status lies within the O Blood Type and not within the Rhesus Factor. This obviously has something to do with the fact that the majority of people in all races belong to Blood Type O.
Now that it has been established that O Positive acts as an Ultimate Donor for all Rh Positive Blood Types and O Negative acts as an Ultimate Donor for all Rh Negative Blood Types it leaves us only to determine why O Negative can give to all Rh Positive Blood Types,and O Positive cannot donate to any Rh Negative Blood Types.
The answer to this lies in understanding the nature of the mutation and defect that constitutes Rh Negative Blood. Those with Rh Negative Blood produce a Rabbit Serum that agglutinates the Red Blood Cells that are found amongst those with Rh Positive Blood Types and therefore one with Rh Negative Blood cannot receive blood from Rh Positive donors. In this regard that which is an unnatural mutation and genetical defect (Rh Negative) cannot receive that which is most natural to human creation (Rh Positive). This is the very nature of the defect which is Rh Negative. Rh Negative is characterized by one who has two defective copies of the RHD Gene rendering the individual incapable of producing Antigen D. Others who have been effected by the mutation and have one functioning copy and one defective copy of the RHD Gene suffer from what is known as RHD Silent Allele. Rh Negative is a genetical defect not a sign of genetical superiority.
WHY IS IT THAT NEGATIVE BLOOD CANNOT BE CLONED?
Negative blood simply means that an individual has a genetical defect in which both copies of the RHD Gene are not able to produce Antigen D. By the nature of creation genetical defects are often limited by a natural inability to reproduce. Even though cloning may be an unnatural process it success relies on the natural ability of cells to reproduce. Being that RH Negative blood is a genetical defect its ability to reproduce is limited by nature.
RABBITS AND THE BASQUES
As stated earlier the Basque people of Spain who are aboriginal to the Iberian Peninsula have the highest concentration of RH Negative Blood. This is O Negative to be specific. The following link explains how to this day Rabbit is a major part of the Basque Cuisine. It also mentions some of the sacred Rabbit traditions that are a part of their heritage. The name Spain itself means ” The Land of Rabbits “. The Rh Negative MUTATION or DEFECT was caused by a continuous generational intake of Rabbit fluids.
The tradition of the Rabbit became so powerful in Europe that the symbol of three hares came to represent the Church and the Trinity. The link below exhibits the importance of the Rabbit icon in relation to the European Churches:
Debunking the White Supremacy Myth of Rh Negative Blood.
1. Rh Positive people evolved from Simians because it is proven that they are related to the Rhesus Monkey, while Rh Negative people are non-evolutionary beings. FALSE
Science has not proven that Rh Positive individuals are anymore or less related to the Rhesus Monkey or any other type of Simian than those with Rh Negative Blood. Rh Positive Blood simply means that your body is normal and healthy in regards to its ability to produce Antigen D,while those with Rh Negative Blood suffer from a mutation and genetical defect which results in the dysfunction of RHD Genes. Yes the Rhesus Monkey also produces Antigen D which is one of many commonalities that are shared by Primates of all sorts. Humans have tongues and Monkeys have tongues. Can you imagine a person born with a birth defect which resulted in this individual not having a tongue. claiming that he has less in common with Simians because of this defect, while at the same time accusing humans born with tongues as being related to the Monkey because of this shared commonality.
2. O Negative Blood is the most superior because it is the Ultimate Donor. FALSE
By nature Blood Type O is the Ultimate Donor it is not the Rhesus Factor which gives it this status.
3. Rh Negative Blood is superior because it can’t be cloned FALSE
Nature has a way of limiting that which is defective. Although cloning itself is an unnatural process it is based on the natural ability of cells to reproduce and multiply. In this way nature has limited the ability to reproduce that which is defective and therefore Rh Negative blood cannot be cloned.
4. The White Race is Superior because they have the highest percentage of Rh Negative Blood: FALSE
Rh Negative blood is a genetical defect and a mutation. 15% of Whites have two defective copies of the RHD Gene which results in their inability to produce Antigen D. Another 45% of Whites suffer from one defective RHD Gene. Those of the latter classification have one defective RHD Gene and one functioning RHD Gene. In this setting the one functioning copy produces Antigen D and therefore they are classified as Rh Positive. However they are living evidence as to the evolutionary process of the mutation that disproportionately plagues the White Race.
All humans are 98% genetically identical to Gorillas and Chimpanzees. Having defective RHD Genes does not make any difference in proving or disproving that one is superior in regards to the theories of evolution.
AB is the only blood type not found amongst gorillas. AB Positive is the ultimate recipent it can generate life from all blood types. However no one can receive AB Positive Blood and live. Within the plasma of the AB Positive Blood is a gift called liquid gold which everyone can receive. It is used to fight off infections. AB POSITIVE is the BLOOD type found on the Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium face cloth. It is the blood type of Jesus Christ.
By
(AMIR) ISHAQ D. AL-SULAIMANI
Clearly the author was in “counter-argument” mode and allowed his disdain for white supremacy claims to get the best of him. However, all the data provided in this article is accurate to the best of my knowledge and research. I’m no scholar on this subject, but I have done some fairly in-depth research and feel reasonably confident the primary claims of this article are on point. Additionally, there are over 20 blood groups not just 8, as well as other factors to differentiate between even between people who have the same blood type and rhesus factor.
There is what I believe, intentional misinformation being put out about the Shroud of Turin and Sadarium. RELIABLE resources say they matched and were AB or AB Positive. I too have seen claims that Jesus was O Negative and/or AB Negative, which upon researching is how I happened upon this page/discussion. None of those resources seem to have any real basis for their claims. It is interesting (conspiracy theorists will appreciate), the effort that has been taken to confuse the Davidic bloodline from the Merovingian bloodline. The entire idea that we evolved in the first place is absurd based on the facts available to us. That is not to say we won’t discover new information, but at this point it is more than a jump to speak of humans having evolved from apes. The quantum leap in evolution required for this to be true disproves itself, as evolution is based upon a steady gradual adaptation to environmental changes and diet. More to that, I believe the Adam & Eve story explain where the different blood types come from (the originals – not the Christian bible’s mistranslated and misinterpreted copies) as well as the Book of Thoth. DNA mutation by “alien” races who visited the Earth. The beginnings of racial problems goes back to the origins of these stories, as well as the history of royalty (which came from Kingship…kinship…cainship), and interbreeding within families. I think it was the interbreeding that caused the mutation in the rhesus gene. I still have much to research to validate a lot of these claims, but that’s my two cents. Namaste.
This post is the reason why no one listens to European New Agers who talk Ancient Africa or any other ancient culture. Yes you do have a great deal to research. That dogma is largely a western phenomenon, Countries that produce more propaganda and historical revisionism than food itself.
Can you provide a source for the “original” Adam & Eve myth and Book of Thoth? Everything I have seen RE the BOT says that it was “engraved into emerald plates,” which sounds very BS a la Joseph Smith’s “golden tablets.”
Thanks.
For the author to consider: rabbits were used symbolically just as many other animals in the history of multiple civilizations i.e. pigs, cows, doves, snakes, etcetear. Rabbits were associated with the Moon or Lunar worship (i.e. appreciation) by Mesoamericans because this is the image they observed on the moon’s surface. What a lot of people haven’t put together is that the symbolic animal of choice was used to represent the 12 houses of the zodiac and astrological constellations. This is why in one age, they are all about making statues of Bulls because present time-space was in the Age of Taurus. This is why Jesus was symbolized at times as fish, because it was during the Age of Aquarius. I could make a multitude of other examples. It doesn’t mean people are worshiping rabbits anymore than people were worshiping fish. The fact that O Negative blood types can produce the same rabbit serum means something, but we can’t say what that is now except in hypothesis. Heck, who knows? We could find out later that AB Positives can produce their own dragon serum. š For the record, my blood type is AB Positive, and I too have that egotistical disease that wouldn’t mind the idea of my blood type being thought of as rare or special. Certainly, everybody also believes their taste in food and music is far superior to anyone else’s. 1Love
Yes, it’s me again. I typed my previous posts in a hurry and didn”t bother to proof before posting. Sorry! I meant to say Jesus was during the Age of Pisces NOT the Age of Aquarius. As an afterthought because it’s hard for me to resist, the true history of fish symbolism outside of astrological ages was to represent the “vagina”. It is associated with the goddess Venus which came from Atargatis which was a Syrian fertility goddess (which I associate with Mary Magdalene as well).
To reach the creator one must fight a battle with the twelve so called gods of the zodiac which rule our earthly kingdom. Until people realize they are acting upon an archetype which is fated to die. The creator is greater than any of these so called Gods. Spirit is greater than Matter. Love is greater than fear, and Unity is the ultimate in all.
Intresting at beginning but…eating rabbits leads to genetic mutation? This is what i perceive from the overall of this article
Whoa. How is any of this nonsense any different from the kind of arguments “skinheads” make about other races? The tunnel vision involved in these kind of thought processes makes the mind reel.
I’m a 55yo O- black female that derived from African, German and Chinese blood lineage. My 30yo child is O+, so of course i had to have the RHogam shot before having her after having an abortion as a teen, and before i was married. I’ve never fit in with most people being that i’m a critical thinker thats also an Empath. I’m also part of a RH Negative forum for a few years. Thanks for creating this site but you should know, i’ve met a blue black African that was also O-. I tend to be able to sense when i’m around a blood relative. AGAIN, THANKS!
I have many relatives who are RH negative. We are all white. Theory blown.
Ethiopians found to be 95% RH negative.
Halie Selaisse, king of Ethiopia, the living God of the Rastaman!
What hope that he the true Line of Solomon, Lion of Judah, King of Kings, Lord of Lords was RH positive?
5% chance, more or less.
Sorry Ishaq but, you can’t make this stuff up!
I am black and rh negative with dark eyes and I lost my first child to find out this information.
@ IKapono
Lool it seems you can make this stuff up, as you just did. 6-7% of Ethiopians are rh negative not the outlandish 98% that you claim, this is due to the integration of the white Berbers and the Semites and so on, who eventually diluted the bloodline.
95%***