Merry King Charles Stuart II: The Black King of England – Oguejiofo Annu
The word Stuart comes from the old nordish root Svart which means black. Stuart is the same word as Swarthy, which means black in old English. [Others claim its root origin is Steward]. However that might be, this is not the crux of the story here. Our story is about the suppressed history of the Black and Brown Europeans including several kings that had once called Europe their original home.
There was once a Stuart line of Kings in England. The name of the founding ancestor was Stuart.
In this post, we feature the original painting of one of the Stuart Kings of England and Scotland, King Charles II, also lovingly known as the “black boy” of England by his subjects.
He is commemorated in the celebrated name of the Black Boy Inn, found all over the British Isle.
Like his ancestors before him, King Charles II was a black man. Many of his surviving paintings falsely depict him as a so-called white man in clear contradiction to the famous description of the jolly King.
However, in the picture posted immediately below, one can see one of the contemporary paintings of King Charles Stuart II, Merry Black Boy of England. This picture invites all to decide why King Charles Stuart II, would have been called the black boy.
King Charles Stuart II 1630 – 1685
The eldest surviving son of Charles I and Henrietta Maria of France, daughter of Henry IV of France, the future Charles II was born on 29th May, 1630, at St. James Palace, London, the second child of the marriage, he replaced an elder brother, Charles James, who had died shortly after birth.
It was said that when Charles was born in 1630 he was nicknamed the Black Boy by his mother, Queen Henrietta Maria, because of his dark and swarthy appearance
In 1646, following political crisis, his father Charles I was overthrown by Oliver Cromwell and beheaded. Charles II had to flee for his life through Scotland and on to France after making a weak and symbolic attempt at regaining the Stuart title. Fate and reality had soon dawned on him. He settled into a life of penury in France.
Upon the death of Oliver Cromwell, Charles was recalled back to England by Cromwell’s legatee and son who had no interest in ruling England. Charles was restored back to the throne and his coronation took place at the traditional venue of Westminster Abbey on 23rd April, 1661.
The Merry Monarch as he was later to become known, is famous for his many mistresses. Although he had numerous children by his mistresses, the Queen, to her great sadness, remained barren.
Charles popularity with the people was solid. Despite the ravages of last great outbreak of the Bubonic Plague struck London in 1665, which claimed thousands of lives; and the great fire of London 1666 which completely destroyed the city, he was highly favoured by the people.
He died without an official heir on 6 February, 1685 after a brief illness and was succeeded by his brother, King James II. He was the most beloved of all the Kings in the line of the Stuarts.
Black King of England
According to the annals of the english monarch:
Charles’ appearance was anything but English, with his sensuous curling mouth, dark complexion, black hair and dark brown eyes, he much resembled his Italian maternal grandmother, Marie de Medici’s side of the family. During his escape after the Battle of Worcester, he was referred to as ‘a tall, black man’ in parliamentary wanted posters.
One of the nick-names he acquired was the black boy His height, at six feet two inches, probably inherited from his Danish paternal grandmother, Anne of Denmark, also set him apart from his contemporaries in a time when the average Englishman was far smaller than today.
English Pubs
All English pubs named the Black boy are named after Charles II due to the swarthy and dark colour of his complexion.
Modern European painters try to hide the racial identity of this jolly King by depicting such fantasy as is posted below:
July 28, 2009
Sources
Black Boy Inn
Afrocentrics are just complete idiots, you people are a joke. If he was black then all the monarchs were black – they were all inter-related – but that is clearly not the case. Your “proof” is a nickname and a print done in black ink, you are damn retards LOL! The Stuarts were heavily involved in the slave trade, only a complete retard would claim they were black.
Dave you are retarded, if you think the image of Charles Stuart which was done in woodcut is a black ink print. Boy, some of you spoilt albinos kids are deluded or you have advanced macular degeneration. How can you look at a black man’s picture and claim otherwise. Is this the first time you are hearing about the black blood in the royal families of Europe. Well, welcome to Rasta Livewire, where ignoramuses like you run into the half that was hidden from them. Oh, by the way, slave traders sold both black and white slaves, and still do so even today. You need to update your knowledge.
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/the-hidden-muurish-royalties-of-old-europe-louis-xiv-edited-by-ironlion/
Jahdey
Dave,
Here is something you should read and if know anyone else who think like you, please pass it on. It has been posted before on Rasta Livewire. However, if you missed it, please read:
Accept the truth now or continue to suffocate in ignorance and mental slavery.
In order to grasp the truth, you must use your free will and freedom of thought. Do not let your mind get trapped within the religious or scientific paradigms. Religion and science are simply forms of control that were created by the ruling elite long before you were born. And thus, it is a shame that after being born on this planet, you were raised on either of those two lies.
Naturally, since you have been lied to about reality your entire life, any truthful revelations contradicting your false worldview may indeed appear to be far-fetched. But, to make things even worse, human beings are stubborn creatures who let their egos override everything else: Instead of learning about new information that does not fit within your current worldview, you would rather exercise your ego by letting others know what is and is not possible, merely based upon your personal knowledge and feeble understanding of what actually exists.
“The spirit of inquiry, the search for greater truth beyond religion and science, the profound seriousness of doing real thinking, philosophy and ontology – these are almost totally lacking in humanity. Humanity is therefore subhuman from lack of genuine intelligence….they automatically reject any emergent facts or realities that do not fit their brain dead cognitive pattern of belief and disbelief. They watch too much television” (Gabriel Chiron, “Truth is Greater Than Man”).
Warning: Upon arriving at this website, you most likely have the strong, instinctual urge to automatically defend your current belief system and to reject all of this information. But, realize that attempting to use your belief system to filter out this information is, in fact, a nonsensical paradox, because it is your very belief system that is at issue here. Thus, instead of using a belief system to do your thinking for you, think for yourself via using your own brain (hopefully, you have one).
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”
—Arthur Schopenhauer (German philosopher, 1788-1860)
The truth hurts and this is why you are here trying to adjust to a truth that does not fit into your deceitful system which has nourish you in the womb of Caucasian colonial mind-frame.
I bet you think Greenland is really the size its portrayed on a map knowing that the square miles of this country proves the maps to be wrong. We are African-Center, and there is nothing wrong with that because we back up our truth with evidence which is hard to refute. Notice that you are having a hard time to academically refute it.
truth never hurts they just cant deal with the lies becoming known as a lie lmaooo
A totally incorrect article. The House of Stuart or Stewart comes from the word Steward. The only relation to black could be their initial hair colour which is related to the Celtic and Gallic Brittains and Normans they descended from. To suggest they were of Congoloid descent is just absurd.
Khalsa, you are incorrect,
_
_
There is another old word used by the Anglo-Saxons to denote black or brown-black the word sweart. The personal names Suart and Sueart may have been derived from this word, and may have originally denoted people of a dark-brown or bLACK COMPLEXION. Some names of this kind are mentioned in the Domesday record of Buckinghamshire and Lincolnshire.
SOURCE: Origin of the Anglo-Saxon race : a study of the settlement of England and the tribal origin of the Old English people(1906) by Thomas William Shore
The modern Germanic words for black are schwarz, svart, swart, zwart, sort and the old english word is sweart…..which all refer to the color black. A black person is called a niger, negro, negra, etc. If your surname is Swart (like in south Africa) then your descendent could have been a blacksmith.
So Stuart is not black and no German word for black has this T.
Furthermore the Norman nobility spoke French and old-english was not used in thsi time.
There is no possibility that this Norman king of england could have been a congoloid. That is the error in this article.
Exactly! The author of this article is obviously spreading disinformation and notice that he doesn’t mention that the Stuart Family was involved in the slave trade of native black Africans; so, how could the Stuart Family have been black as well? That’s logically impossible!
Khalsa, do the name Schwarzenegger (Schwarz as a nigger) speaks to you ?
in this mundane sphere of existence, the earths watchers/guardians had a lot to do with who’s WHO racially. they’re the unseen and wholly unrecognised beings that gave ALL mankind their false civilisations.
Everyone knows King Charles was dark, he’s part French and Italian, also scottish and danish…. but he wasn’t black!! Don’t be so ridiculous! He had dark olive skin and black hair yes, but this article is soooo exaggerated! The term black was given by his mother and if you ask me it was very cruel for the time…. besides a “black King” would not have been allowed. He was simply a shock to the PURE WHITE PALENESS OF THE TIME!! You have to realise that people didn’t really see dark mediterranean people back then. Wow it is from one extreme to the other with stories of King Charles…. and by the by I know as I am his illegitimate great great great grandaughter. I havde olive skin too.
c stuart i have b
never heard so much bs come out of the mouth of a wanna be smart ass like you although u say ur the great great great great daughter of king chs with olive complexion well damn have u seen yourself in the mirror ur black not white and there fore king chs was a blk man with blk skin and hair which means that all of his predecessors were blk as well since the blk man and woman rules over enslaved whites for thousand of years this has to be hard for the white man to except for they are living in a fantasy world and suffering from delusions of grandeur to the point that their past as slaves to their blk master throughout the world has been erased from their collective memory and for you which i dont belivee ur a relation to him cite that he had an olive complexion less u mean he was green olives are jet blk my dear so come again grow up and think reasonably about your level of undertsanding and stop protecting lies with lieds and accept the truth like a reasonabl mature adult would do
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-Meets-The-Bible-ebook/dp/B0063I5WEM
Science teaches that modern humans originated in East Africa and spread from there to the rest of the world. The Bible teaches that humans originated in the Garden of Eden and spread from there to the rest of the world. It is almost universally assumed that, in terms of location of origins, these versions are in conflict. For the first time a book challenges this assumption by referring to the relevant verses of Genesis which give the names of the lands just outside Eden and the rivers flowing through them. The Table of the Nations in Genesis is then called upon to confirm the location of these lands, two of which are in the neighbourhood of Cush in East Africa. The results are confirmed by extra-Biblical Jewish tradition such as the Book of Jubilees and the Book of Enoch.
They are also confirmed, surprisingly, by Egyptian sacred texts such as the Book of the Dead, the Book of AmTuat and the Book of Gates. These books locate the Egyptian afterlife paradise in the Tuat or Netherworld. The geography of the Tuat turns out to be based on the lakes, mountains, mammals and birds of East Africa and not Egypt as generally assumed. Influences are traced, by the author, from Central Sudan and Upper Nubia into Lower Nubia and then Upper Egypt during the predynastic brought by the Followers of Horus. Egyptian kingship and the white crown are amongst the influences that the author postulates as coming from Central Sudan.
Every chapter reveals new and unique discoveries that will leave the reader with a completely revolutionary understanding of the origins of Egyptian civilisation and the Bible.
dave at the time his skin ,,king james was not red ruddy not with lack melanin ,,no bleac,,,,,,,,,,,,,,thats the name of carrions in middle english ,,before black a moor brand ,,black is an adjective used as noun ,,in his time he was noble white but his kin was brown u call black,,thats retarted to be color blind to brand a man JUST BEC CAUSE U CAN , when the MIDDLE ENGLISH BLEAC-H CARRION CAGOT woman farted out came the retarded,you yourself are not a real free white sovereign IINSULTS REACTIONS CATAPULTS BACK TO KKNOWLEDGE U LACK CHECK BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY VOLUME 4 but some artficial meet your strawman construct of an illusion mis known as white by sight,,the only racist is those who creaed the fake color race no those who defend them self for being attacked for what u call them an kill thm as black ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,in us law all capital gangerine blaclk ,,created by fake wight who call the race thy created ,negro colored black a racist after we never all agree to race over nationality ,,the muurs we dont need your color of law race to erase an replace what we the muurs set up an out in place now u waste the human race to which u must lie n cheat to keep up the pace