Before the Advent of the Black Moors of Africa who ruled parts of Spain for 700 years there was Medieval Europe a classic rat hole. Until the Blacks came in from Africa and cleaned it up.
In this installment, we present to our readers an article from Pravda describing all that had been achieved in European history just before the advent of the Black Moors of Africa. The Black Moors of Africa gave the Europeans, African sciences (now falsely termed as western science), African commerce, African architecture, African culture, African governance, African libraries and African hygiene.
Other installment will do a comparison of the state of development attained by the medieval age Black Moors of Africa who built Granada, Cordoba, Toledo, and other cities of Southern Europe.
Don Jaide
………………………………..
The stench of medieval Europe still echoes today
22.01.2008
People normally associate different epochs with different smells. The Middle Ages smell of sewage and decaying bodies. German writer Patrick Suskind, the author of a well-known novel “Perfume: The Story of a Murderer,†wrote in his book that the stench of European cities in the late Middle Ages period was unbearable. His work conveys the terrible smell of human faeces and urine in the streets, decaying wood and rat dung, spoiled coal and animal fat, mouldy dust and chamber pots.
Stench used to be an inseparable part of all human activities, constructive or destructive. The Queen of Spain Isabel of Castle (the end of the 15th century) confessed that she had taken a bath only twice in a lifetime – when born and married. A daughter of one of French kings died of lice. Dysentery and scab caused fatal terminations to Popes Clement V and Clement VII correspondingly. Duke Norfolk neglected bathing for religious reasons. As a result of such disregard numerous abscesses dotted his body.
A billet-doux sent by the inveterate Don Juan Henry of Navarre to his sweetheart Gabrielle d’ Estrées became an anecdote. Its contents conveyed the following meaning: “Do not wash yourself, my sweetheart, I’ll visit you in three weeksâ€. The king himself took a bath only thrice in a lifetime, twice coercively.
Russian ambassadors at Louis XIV court wrote that His Majesty stunk like a wild animal. Europeans considered Russians perverts because it was a tradition for the latter to take steam baths once a month.
European cities were buried in sewage. Town residents splashed the contents of garbage pails and washtubs out into the street on the heads of carefree passers-by. Stagnated slops made stinking pools; and a great number of town pigs crowned the whole picture. People emptied chamber pots right out of their windows making streets look like cesspools. Bathrooms were the rarest luxury. Fleas, lice and bugs swarmed in rich and poor houses of London and Paris.
Unsanitary conditions, diseases and starvation personify medieval Europe as it was. Even the noble class could not afford to eat their fill. Noble families were happy if at best two or three of ten children survived. Delivery was quite an undertaking for women: a third part of them died in labor. Street illumination also was poor – oil lamps, splinters or wax candles at best. Hunger, smallpox, leprosy and syphilis disfigured people’s faces.
There were not any cleaning agents or the notion of personal hygiene in Europe up to the middle of the 19th century. One Italian nobleman said in his memoirs that in the 16th century it was impossible to walk along the streets that resembled a fetid stream of turbid water. He had to hold a scented handkerchief or a small bouquet to his nose not to vomit. But not only faeces poisoned the air. Butchers slaughtered and disembowel cattle right in the streets. They would scatter guts around and pour blood out onto the pavement.
In late Middle Ages people learned to process wastes and faeces. Urine, for example, was used to tan leather and bleach cloth, animals’ bones – to produce flour. In days of old painters placed barrels for urine near the farms, they used it to knead paints. In Ancient Rome they sold even the urine from latrines to wool dyers and leather tanners. What could not be processed was left in the street.
Rain was the only street cleaner in those times. And still, notwithstanding its sanitary function, rain was considered a providential punishment. Rains washed dirt out of all cracks, and raging sewage streams rushed through the streets. Just like this there appeared a small river Merderon in France (from French “merde†– shit).
If there were stinking funds in the country, in cities people defecated in narrow side streets and yards. Only after the ‘hydraulic revolution’ aqueducts and gutters appeared; they provided houses with water and removed the sewage.
People were not cleaner than the streets where they lived. “Water baths warm the body, but weaken the organism and widen pores. That’s why they can be dangerous and cause different diseases, even deathâ€, a medical treaty of the 16th century runs. Medieval doctors thought that infectious air could penetrate through the cleaned pores. Owing to this cause all social bathhouses were abolished. In 15-16th centuries rich citizens had a bath at least twice a year, in the 17-18th centuries they decidedly stopped to wash themselves. The French king Louis XIV had a bath only twice in his life on doctors’ advice. But the procedure shocked the sovereign so, that he made a vow not to do it anymore.
All hygienic arrangements included only hands and mouth rinsing, but not the whole face. “By no means you should wash your face, – wrote medics in the 16th century, – as it can cause catarrh or weaken the eyesight.†As for women, they had a bath only two or three times a year.
The majority of aristocrats used scented rags to rub the body. It was recommended to moisten armpits and groin with rose water. Men wore small bags with fragrant herbs between the shirt and waistcoat. Women used only fragrant powder.
Medieval ‘neat’ persons often changed their clothes. They considered that it absorbs all dirt and cleans the body. But our ancestors were rather selective on this issue. Clean starched shirt for every day was a privilege for rich people only. That is why white crimped collars and cuffs that were the evidence of wealth and cleanliness of their owners became fashionable. Poor men neither washed nor changed their clothing. Most of them had only one shirt. No wonder – clothes were extremely expensive. The cheapest canvas shirt and one milk cow, for example, had the same price.
Source: Pravda.Ru URL:
http://english.pravda.ru/science/earth/103574-stench-0
Translated by Ksenia Sedyakina
Pravda.ru
Jahdey, dude youre mest up. You got to let these schizofrenic, delusional thoughts of afrocentrism go. You cant just go around stealing other peoples history. All respected historians agree that Berbers and Arabs conquered Iberia, thats good enough for. Whats allso good enough for me is the mostly non-black faces in Magreb states. What happened to the ‘Black Moors’? Where they massacred, where they driven out of their lands? According to historical sources, that never has happened. But he you dont care about historical accuracy, or logic for that matter.
Why do modern Berbers have the highest amounts of European Genes of all other African people? Check the link below for some pictures of Algerian Berbers. They in no way seem to have any Black features.
http://imazighen.vze.com/kabyles/algeria.htm
Whatever inquires demands
“…What happened to the ‘Black Moors’? Where they massacred, where they driven out of their lands? ..”
Jahdey Speaks
“Your piratical slave=mongering ancestors deported them to Cape Verde, Jamaica, Haiti, Carolina, Florida and Brazil. Inquisition was the process through which the Black Moors were flushed out of Europe.
Go ask the ghost of Shakespare why he believed that Moors were the so-called Blacks of today.”
Could you explain why modern Berbers along the North African coasts are the ‘whitest’ of all African people. If according to you the Libyans/Numidians/Berbers were originally Blacks and they were ‘whitewashed’ by invading Arabs, why is it then that modern Berbers have ‘whiter genes’ then Arab North Africans? Shouldnt the source of all this ‘whitewashing’ be whiter then other North African groups?
Im seriously interested in your explenation for that.
Shakespeare was born in 1564, nearly a century after the fall of Grenada, thousands of miles from Spain. According to what we know of his life, he has never been anywhere near that country. He doesnt seem to be the most reliable source on Muslim Spain.
The great Arab theologian Ibn Khaldun in 1377 wrote a famous book called “Book of Evidence, Record of Beginnings and Events from the Days of the Arabs, Persians and Berbers and their Powerful Contemporaries”.
In this book he in great length describes the ruling powers of Moorish dynasties and their ancestries. In it he allso gives a clear picture of the Muslim societies in the Magreb and Spain. The book in no way supports your theory of the Black Moors.
whatever: dont forget about the non-white berbers in morocco!
Toscana Mori: you absolutely hit the nail on the head! so many racist white people here in america and the absolute reason why they themselves suffer along with even the Black man!
loanlady, youre absolutely right, but the vast majority of Berbers (especially those living along the coasts of Africa) are not Black. Allso why have the ancient Egyptians painted the ancient Libyans (ancestors of modern Berbers) as white. They painted themselves as brown and the Nubians as Black.
If, according to Jahdey, the entire worlds civilization stems from Black Africa, why is it then that Africa below the Ethiopia and the Sahara was not known to mankind. All the ancient world maps draw Africa as going no further then the southern tip of the Sahara. It just doesnt make any sense.
Another point is the lack of any evidence that point to some great ancient civilization in sub-Saharan Africa. If Black Africans were so ingenius to develop such brilliant societies in North Africa/Middle East/Europe, then why is Southern Africa so devoid of any great accomplishments in ancient times. Again, it doesnt make any sense.
At some time in history mankind went from roaming across plains to living a sedetary life style. They built houses and farms. This change took place in modern-day Iraq. Trade went up and people started living in close together. Its called the birth of civilization. This didnt happen in Africa, it happened in West Asia (modern Iraq). From there ‘civilization’ was spread throughout the Middle East region and into Egypt, Anatolia and Greece. Wth Southern Africa being seperated from the ‘civilized world’ by the gigantic, scorching Sahara, this first wave of civilization simply didnt go further then Egypt. Thats how I see it.
You shouldnt have to claim acievements that simply werent Black. There are numerous people/achievement blacks can and should be proud of. Years from now people around the world will speak about the most powerfull country of all time (US), and their culture that was dominated by Black people. School books will mention brilliant artists like Louis Armstrong, Charlie Parker, Miles Davis, John Coltrane and Cliff Richard. How blacks were the first one to perform the classic artforms of Jazz, Blues, Soul, Reggea, Rock and Rap. A hundred years from now people will speak of Miles Davis like they speak of Beethoven. You can look at great Black leaders like Malcolm X, Luther King jr. and Mandela and be proud as hell. I know one thing, the Dutch dont have a man like Malcolm X to call their own.
Allso by believing that people stole the Black Moorish and ancient Egyptian achievements from Blacks, you asume that the Semitic Muslims are less hated than Blacks. I mean you guys believe that all these white European scholars hate Blacks so much that they rather take Black history and give them to the Arabs/Berbers. This is of course riduculous since Arabs are the single most hated ethnic group in the entire world. In a time when Arabs (Muslim Semites) are the subject of the entire worlds hatred, nothing would be spared discredit them or the achievements of their ancestors. Just think about it.