The First Chinese
By Dr. Clyde Winters
Edited by Ogu-Eji-Ofo-Annu
It can be reasonably assumed that the first inhabitants of the chinese mainland were Black Brown Africans from East, West and Central regions of Africa given that the earliest human skeletal remains in China are of “Negro” (or “Negritos†a psuedo-scientific term commonly used today) people. The next oldest skeletal type after the period of predominance of the African immigrants were the Classical Mongoloids or Austronesian speakers.
Archaeological research makes it clear that “Negroids” (read: Central African skeletal types) were very common to ancient China. F. Weidenreich in Bull. Nat. Hist. Soc. Peiping 13, (1938-30) noted that the one of the earliest skulls from north China found in the Upper Cave of Chou-k’ou-tien, was of a Oceanic Negroid/ Melanesoid ” (p.163). This is the so-called Peking Man. This would place people in China during the Mesolithic looking like African/Negro people , not native American.
These Blacks were the dominant group in South China. Kwang-chih Chang, writing in the 4th edition of Archaeology of ancient China (1986) wrote that:” by the beginning of the Recent (Holocene) period the population in North China and that in the southwest and in Indochina had become sufficiently differentiated to be designated as Mongoloid and OCEANIC NEGROID races respectively….”(p.64). By the Upper Pleistocene the Negroid type was typified by the Liu-chiang skulls from Yunnan (Chang, 1986, p.69).
Negroid skeletons dating to the early periods of Southern Chinese history have been found in Shangdong, Jiantung, Sichuan, Yunnan, Pearl River delta and Jiangxi especially at the initial sites of Chingliengang (Ch’ing-lien-kang) and Mazhiabang (Ma chia-pang) phases (see: K.C. Chang, The archaeology of ancient China, (Yale University Press:New Haven,1977) p.76) . The Chingliengang culture is often referred to as the Ta-wen-k’ou (Dawenkou) culture of North China. The presence of Negroid skeletal remains at Dawenkou sites make it clear that Negroes spread out from the North to South China. The Dawenkou culture predates the Lung-shan culture which is associated with the Xia civilization.
Many researchers believe that the Yi of Southern China were the ancestors of the Austronesian, Polynesian and Melanesian people.
In the Chinese literature the Blacks were called li-min, Kunlung, Ch’iang (Qiang), Yi and Yueh. The founders of the Xia Dynasty and the Shang Dynasties were blacks. These blacks were called Yueh and Qiang. The modern Chinese are descendants of the Zhou. The second Shang Dynasty (situated at Anyang) was founded by the Yin. As a result this dynasty is called Shang-Yin.
The Yin or Classical/Oceanic Mongoloid type is associated with the Austronesian speakers ( Kwang-chih Chang, “Prehistoric and early historic culture horizons and traditions in South China”, Current Anthropology, 5 (1964) pp.359-375 :375). Djehuti your Austronesian or Oceanic ancestors were referred to in the Chinese literature as Yin, Feng, Yen, Zhiu Yi and Lun Yi.
It is not clear that contemporary European and Chinese people are descendants of the original Black population which lived in Europe and Asia; neither is it clear that the Chinese are descendants of the Austronesian speaking people.
Textual evidence and the skeletal record seem to indicate that contemporary Chinese and European people come out of nowhere after 1500 BC, the European Sea People came from the North and attacked Egypt, and the Chinese (Hua) people came from the North and ran the Black Qiang and Yueh tribes, along with the Austronesian Yin (classical mongoloid or Austronesian speakers) off the Chinese mainland back into Southeast Asia or on to the Pacific Islands.
the whites would have us believe that they just happen to spring up in the med.with all there wisdom and know how . where did all there know how come from ? pray tell! certainly not from the north of the med area. they were all living in caves. ancient black kemmit is only place the greeks could have got all there learning quite simply because ancient kemmit pre dates them! what ancient kemmit got there wisdom and know from the greeks?You white revisionist have got to wake up . the gane is over because most black have woke up your preaching to the preacher now!
“black kemmit is only place the greeks could have got all there learning quite simply because ancient kemmit pre dates them! what ancient kemmit got there wisdom and know from the greeks”
If that is so, where are the correlations between Greek culture, education, mythology etc and Egyptian (or “Kemetian”) culture, education, mythology etc? We must also remember that the Greeks “hellenized” Egyptian culture in their texts, interpreting it through a Grecian, as opposed to an Egyptian, mindset. oh, and can we please ‘not’ resort to the “Teh Youropeeans wuz in cavez” myth? Unless you accept the fact that, just as the “celts” I presume you are referring to livde in villages, so too did most, if not all, non-Egyptian Africans.
Link with more information.
http://www.martinlutherking.org/not-out-africa.html
“the chinese should be leary of the white man because he detroyed there way of life there emporoir and know there comunist and thats a corupted form of african communalism remember the boxer wars forced drug addiction of china read zoa say tong.”
So..you’d prefer the Chinese to be living under tyrannical dynasties of “Emperors” than under a Communist system? I mean, both are bad but that’s just stupid. Oh, and “drug use” was widespread “before” the Boxer Rebellion, which was actually a revolt against “European interests” in China. Lastly, it didn’t come from “African communalism”, Communism came from “Primitive communism”, or the Communism existing with the early hunter-gatherer tribes.
in reply to jypshun mass.i understand your warped view of history most whites are just as much a victim of the revisionist as black are . that is one of the primary problem with race relationships today . blacks
do not want to be greater than anyone nor lesser. we just want to have the historical truth told. the point is the kemet culture was the spring board for the greek culture. ” hellenized” is a evasive way of saying “borrowed” if i borrow something it belongs to the lender as far as the correlations of culture,education , and mythology. the pillar of the greek temples are an obvious similarity to kemet temples . and any one that has done a little study can tell that the ancient greeks travaled to kemmit for their education. if you truly want to know the truth read “STOLEN LEGACY” BY GEORGE JAMES. GREEK MYTHOLOGYS are appellations of kemmit mythology. blacks in caves in africa don”t deserve a reply.
“in reply to jypshun mass.i understand your warped view of history most whites are just as much a victim of the revisionist as black are . that is one of the primary problem with race relationships today .”
Maturity in droves here:
And I, as ‘suscestible’ to immaturity as most here, would consider Afrocentrism to be the most “warped” “historical school of thought” out there: If Africa is indeed the “powerhouse of the world”, why are you intent on proving that “Every famous person/race/civilisation was black”?
“do not want to be greater than anyone nor lesser. we just want to have the historical truth told. the point is the kemet culture was the spring board for the greek culture. ”
I would ask again that you visit that link as, unlike you, I have provided evidence. And no, you seem to have “issues” with your past as you seem intent on “claiming” the history of other nations as your own.
“hellenized†is a evasive way of saying “borrowed†if i borrow something it belongs to the lender as far as the correlations of culture,education , and mythology. the pillar of the greek temples are an obvious similarity to kemet temples”
No, you are quite intent on missing the point: The Greeks “hellenized” Ancient Egpyt: That is, viewing Egyptian myth, culture etc through a Greek mindset. It’s similiar to declaring an African tribal god to be a “corrupted rendering” of a Biblical character, such as Goliath. Oh, and Vitruvius, an ancient Roman writer begs to differ: And before you ask, I’ll take the word of the people that ‘actually’ had access to the scripts than an “armchair historian” such as yourself. And so what if there’s a correlation? The Persians built columns as well: Does that mean they learnt it from Egypt? If the Native Americans learnt how to skin animals, and Europeans learnt how to skin animals, does that mean the Europeans ‘taught’ the Native Americans it?
“and any one that has done a little study can tell that the ancient greeks travaled to kemmit for their education.”
Read the link I posted: NONE OF THE FAMOUS GREEK WRITERS EVER MENTIONED VISITING, OR LEARNING IN, EGYPT!
“GREEK MYTHOLOGYS are appellations of kemmit mythology.”
Where? Is Set supposed to be Hades? Amon supposed to be Zeus?
“blacks in caves in africa donâ€t deserve a reply.”
Typical response:
“I can say that whites are baby-raping, cave dwelling degenerates, but hell to anyone else that says the reverse about Africans!”
But honestly – how was the rest of Africa going when Egypt/Meroe/Kush was at its height?
tne negro loves to make claims like this, like being the earliest human is an accomplishment, what they don’t understand is that with evolution, being the latest much better then being the earliest. why is it that the oldest race is the least advanced? the negro civilization has flatlined for the last 100,000+ years,without a single advancement traceable to the negroid, not even the wheel! the only changes coming from contact with arabs and caucasians, so give the negroid the title of “earliest homosapien”, this is one time I’m very happy to be last!