The Original Meaning of the “N” Word
By: Pianke Nubiyang
27, January 02, at 12:50 p.m.
THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE “N” WORD HAD A CONNOTATION CONNECTED TO THE GODS
The word “nig…” used to be the most revered and sacred word in the universe. It was the “devine epithet,” and the people who began using the mother of all words that originated from this word which was sullied by the British, were the ancient Egyptians or better, the Khemites, who called their land, “Khemet” or “The Black Land,” and also used the name, “Ta-merri” or “The Beloved Land.”
THE WORD “N-G-R” MEANS “GOD” IN ANCIENT EGYPTIAN
The father of the “n” word was the word used by the ancient Egyptians for “God.” That word was “N-g-r” and as one can see, there are no vowels in this word. In the ancient African and even the present African languages (the Afro-Asiatic linguistic family) vowels such as “a,e,i,o,u” are not found in many translations, particularly of ancient Hebrew and Egyptian languages.
In the translation of ancient Egyptian and Hebrew (which is heavily influenced by Egyptian), one will not always find vowels, therefore, very few people will realize that the word for God, which is “N-g-r” pronounced “en-ger” was the Egyptian word for God. In fact, the Egyptian word for “nature,” is also the word used for God. That word is “ntyr,” (pronounced net-jer.” Now prounce the word “nigg..” and the word “net-jer,” and one sees the clear connection.
MANY AFRICAN WORDS DENOTING PEOPLE OR IMPORTANT PEOPLE STARTS WITH “N”
In many African languages particularly the Niger-Congo language family. Words that connects with people, Gods, and groups begin with “n” and that word is always the first word. For instance, the word “Nkosi” in Xhosa is “God.” The word “Ndaba,” in another South African language is “counsil” (or gathering of elders). Many common names also begin with “N”.
WORDS OF AFRICAN ORIGINS THAT CAME FROM THE ORIGINAL WORD, “N-G-R” (PROUNOUNCED EN-JER)
N-g-r (Egyptian;pronounced en-jer) = God
N-t-y-r (Egypt; pronounced net-ger) = God, Devine
Negash (Ethiopia; ne-gash) = King
Negus (Ethiopia; ne-goos) = Emperor
Nkosi (Xhosa; en-kosi) = God
Ndaba (Zulu; en-daba) = Counsil/Officials,
Naga (East Indian, Nubian = People
Nugarmarta (West African = People (See the writings of Ibn Buttata’s journey to West Africa)
HOW THE N BECAME CORRUPTED
The Romans are probably the first Europeans to misrepresent the word for God, which was “N-g-r”
About the early part of the First Century, Romans tried to invade Ethiopia. (see BLACK HISTORY CHART or go here for a list of Nubian Pharaohs and Queens.
The Romans who were speakers of Latin always knew of Blacks, there were Blacks in Rome, Italy had an ancient Black presence long before the Latins migrated from Central Asia and North Eastern Europe during the ‘Aryan’ migrations. In fact, the Latin ethnic groups is still in existance in the northern part of Italy even today. This part of Italy still grips about Hannibal’s invasion which happened about two thousand two hundred years ago!!!!
The Romans had a name for Blacks, it was “Niger” and it meant Black or people of African origins. Thus, Septimus Niger would have meant, Septimus the Negro. Yet, how did the Romans connect the word “Niger” to Black.
In ancient times, Blacks were worshipped as Gods. The Gods of Greece came from Egypt. The worship of the Black Madonna is connected with the worship of Isis, the Egyptian Goddes. Moreover, Blacks in Egypt called their Pharaohs “En-ger” or “N-g-r” he was literally referred to as “THE GOD.”
It is very possible that when the Romans tried to invade Nubia, they asked for the name of the God and the term “N-g-r” was probably used in place of “leader” or “king”. In Angola, the same also happened during the 1600’s when the word “N-gola” which means “King” (notice the “N” and the “g” in this word as well), came to be “Angola,’ the name of a kingdom in south western Africa.
(Read more on Nubian, Egyptian, West African and ancient American trade and commercial connections in ancient times; see the book, “Susu Economics: The History of Pan-African Trade, Commerce, Money and Wealth,” published by 1stBooks Library, 1stbooks.com also see barnesandnoble.com
WHERE DID THE ROMANS FIRST HEAR THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE “N” WORD
A Roman general invading Nubia from Egypt would probably have used the Egyptian term for Pharaoh, which was “N-g-r” (God). This term then was used to refer to all Blacks and as time went by, the word N-g-r became Niger. In Fact, the Romans also classified their Emperors as “Gods,” to follow the Egyptian style. Moreover, as the History Channel poointed out, “Rome was a collection of villages before the Egyptians built it up.”(paraphrased).
The word “em-peror” sounds very close to the word “en-jer.” That is not a coincidental connection…………
For more see:
Original: The Original Meaning of the “N” Word — by Pianke Nubiyang
The Kingdom of Israel was broken into two parts after the reign of King Solomon (1st Kings 11), and the Northern Kingdom of Israel (the ‘House of Israel’) was then taken into captivity by the Assyrians, in what came to be known as the ‘Great Dispersion’ (the Diaspora, or ‘the Great Sowing.’)
The Prophecies in Hosea, Deuteronomy, and elsewhere foretold that the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel would be taken into captivity for disobedience to the Covenant, but that they would come back to Israel one day. However, until recent times, no one has known either where these Lost Sheep are, or how they could possibly get called back into the commonwealth of Israel.
Today, however, scholars have been shown the answers as to where the House of Joseph is, and how they will return: Exhaustive research has shown that the Christian peoples are the prophetic (if not also the literal) descendants of the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel; and that as such, they have a prophetic destiny, as foretold in the prophets.
The Jewish writers of the Renewed Covenant called the Lost Ten Tribes ‘gentiles,’ because that was how the Jews referred to the Lost Ten Tribes in that day (since they no longer lived in the Land, spoke Hebrew, or kept the Torah of Moshe; as recorded in the Talmud, at Tractate Yevamot 17A.)
The apostle Paul (aka Shaliach Shaul), however, tells us at Romans 9 through 11 that the ‘gentiles’ are actually the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel, because he speaks to these ‘gentiles’ about their role in the prophecies in Hosea, which foretold that the Lost Ten Tribes would be scattered for a time, only to be regathered one day. Note also that the apostles James and Peter write their epistles not to ‘gentiles’ as we think of them, but to ‘gentiles’ who are also referred to as the ‘Dispersed of the Twelve Tribes’ and ‘the Twelve Tribes which are scattered abroad.’ (James 1:1, 1 Peter 1:1, respectively.)
The ‘gentiles’ of Scripture, then, are both the Lost Ten (or Twelve) tribes, and their descendants, the Christian people: And their destiny is one day to return to the Land of Israel.
One of the great secrets of Scripture is that while the Messiah Yeshua really did come to bring division between the Two Houses (the Jews and the ‘gentiles’), the Jews were not truly cast away; but that it was needful that it appear that way, for a time. The Two Houses (the Jews and the ‘gentiles’) had to remain separate for some two thousand years because they each had separate missions to fulfill, in order to work the Divine Plan of Redemption for fallen seed of Adam; and if there was not temporary enmity put between them, they would not have gone their separate ways: But all this was only ever meant to be temporary, and for a purpose.
The apostle Paul tells us that he wishes us not to be ignorant of this great secret: That while it appears the Jews were cast away, they really were not, because the gifts and election of the Almighty are irrevocable (Romans 11:25-30):
Uniting Ephraim
Acts 15 into Action
Ma’aseh (Acts) 15:19-21
19 “Therefore it is my judgment that we do not trouble those who are returning to Elohim from among the Gentiles,
20 but that we write to them that they abstain from things contaminated by idols, and from fornication, and from what is strangled, and from blood;
21 for Moshe from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read (aloud) in the synagogues every Sabbath.â€
Uniting Ephraim
Who among us does not desire to have regular places of worship, as well as communities in which our children can grow up, healthy, happy and strong? And who among us does not feel a yearning in his heart for lasting friendship and fellowship?
Many of us feel the need for the Body of Messiah to unify, and to date there have been a number of Two-House initiatives designed to bring about unity through various compromises. The reason these initiatives have failed is that they have attempted to forge unity on something less than full Torah obedience. That will never work.
YHWH will never bless anything less than full obedience to His Torah: and therefore, true lasting unity will never be achieved short of full Torah obedience. Or is there some reason that YHWH should bless human rebellion?
The reason our forefathers were vomited out of the Land of Israel in the first place was for failing to keep all of the Torah. Is there some reason that YHWH should allow His people to return back home, before they repent of their willful disobedience to Him?
Ezekiel 37: Uniting the Stick
As we will detail in the study Joseph’s Return, the process of restoring the House of Israel (or Ephraim) to the Land of Israel is already underway. Step one is complete: and now all that is required is to complete steps two and three.
Ezekiel 37 speaks to this process of reunification between the House of Judah and the House of Ephraim.
Yehezqel (Ezekiel) 37:15-20
15 Again the word of YHWH came to me, saying,
16a “As for you, son of man, take a stick for yourself and write on it: ‘For Judah and for the children of Israel, his companions.’
16b Then take another stick and write on it, ‘For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the House of Israel, his companions.’
17 Then join them one to another for yourself into one stick, and they will become one in your hand.
18 And when the children of your people speak to you, saying, ‘Will you not show us what you mean by these?’ —
19 say to them, ‘Thus says YHWH Elohim: “Surely I will take the Stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel, his companions; and I will join them with it, with the Stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they will be one in My hand.”‘
20 And the sticks on which you write will be in your hand before their eyes.â€
We need to study this passage closely, because it tells us a number of vitally important things.
First, notice that in verse 16, YHWH does not simply hand the son of man a stick. Rather, it is the son of man who must ‘take’ a stick for himself.
16a “As for you, son of man, take a stick for yourself and write on it: ‘For Judah and for the children of Israel, his companions.’â€
Second, while Yeshua sometimes called Himself the ‘Son of Man,’ far more often than not, when the phrase ‘son of man’ is used in prophecy, it refers to a human being (and in this case, to Ezekiel). Therefore, Ezekiel (i.e. a human being or beings) is commanded to take a stick for himself.
As we shall see, the term ‘stick’ is a euphemism for a Scriptural nation (with all that being a Scriptural nation entails). Thus, the ‘Stick of Judah’ was ‘taken’ in 1948, when the Nation of Israel was born in one day.
YeshaYahu (Isaiah) 66:8
8 Who has heard such a thing?
Who has seen such things?
Shall the earth be made to give birth in one day?
Or shall a nation be born at once?
For as soon as Zion was in labor,
She gave birth to her children.
From the world’s perspective, the Nation of Israel was not really born ‘in one day;’ but rather it came about as the culmination of decades of human effort and struggle.
The Zionist movement began in earnest after Theodore Herzl published Der Judenstaat back in 1896. However, it took decades to sway world public opinion in favor of the idea; and even then, the world probably would not have cared, had it not been for the Holocaust.
Therefore it was on May the 14th, 1948, that the prophecy in Ezekiel was fulfilled, and the Stick of Judah was ‘taken’ into the hands of men.
Step #2: The Stick of Joseph
The order of events in Ezekiel 37 is also highly significant, as it indicates the order in which events must play out here on earth.
16a “As for you, son of man, take a stick for yourself and write on it: ‘For Judah and for the children of Israel, his companions.’
16b Then take another stick and write on it, ‘For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the House of Israel, his companions.’
17 Then join them one to another for yourself into one stick, and they will become one in your hand.â€
This passage shows us that YHWH intends to bring about the following sequence of events:
1. First, a Stick of Judah must be formed by inspired human effort. (This happened in 1948.)
2. Next, a Stick of Joseph must also be formed by human effort. (This is beginning to happen.)
3. Finally, after the Stick of Joseph (the Nation of Ephraim) is formed, it must put itself together with the Stick of Judah in the Land of Israel. (This will be the Ingathering.)
We will discuss all of these things in much more detail in the Joseph’s Return study, but from this passage it should be clear that until the Ephraimite people form a ‘stick’ (a nation) for themselves, they can in no wise return back to the Land of Israel.
That is to say, before the Ephraimite people can return to the Land of Israel, first they must re-form themselves as a nation. But in practical, everyday terms, how is this to be done?
Being Called Out Of the Church
As YHWH continues to restore His people’s awareness of their ancestral heritage as Ephraimites, they are leaving their false places of worship (in the churches), and are seeking clean places of worship, instead.
A few of these are being called straight to high standards of ritual cleanliness and purity. These blessed individuals know that YHWH is serious about His standards, and that He will not honor anything less than full Torah obedience. For this reason, they aggressively set out to discover what YHWH wants from them, and then they go straight for it.
However, for most of Ephraim, the restoration process is glacially slow. Change does happen, but it is hard to see. Rather than aggressively set out to discover all that the Creator wants from them (and then eagerly do that), they wait (seemingly endlessly) for ‘conviction.’
One can certainly understand why Ephraimites would wait for ‘conviction’ before making changes. Having been lied to for so long by the Church, they do not want to practice any doctrine that is contrary to the Torah.
However, the sword of ‘conviction’ is double-edged, and it cuts both ways. While waiting so long for ‘conviction’ to avoid making errors, the Ephraimite people commit the exact mirror-opposite sin: that of omission.
As we will see below (and as we explain in the Nazarene Israel study), the gentile return procedure assumes that one will begin to obey the Torah of Moshe as one hears it. In the minds of the authors of the Renewed Covenant, this process was expected to take approximately a year, or two at the most. However, by waiting lackadaisically for ‘conviction,’ most people fail to obey the same Torah that they claim they are hoping not to transgress.
This, of course, is just another form of hypocrisy; and it is one that will have to be corrected before Ephraim can be restored to the Land of Israel.
But how shall this hypocrisy be corrected, and the Nation of Ephraim (i.e., the Stick of Joseph) simultaneously be created? It is by putting Acts Chapter Fifteen into action.
Acts Fifteen into Action
As detailed in the Nazarene Israel study, the Nazarene Apostles bound a list of four prerequisites for those gentiles who wanted to join themselves to the Nation of Nazarene Israel. Further, since the Apostles had only bound on earth what had already been bound in heaven, these four prerequisites for gentile return are still binding on us today.
Let us take a close look at this passage, for it is widely misunderstood; but to understand it properly will clear up a lot of details for us.
Ma’aseh (Acts) 15:19-21
19 “Therefore it is my judgment that we do not trouble those who are returning to Elohim from among the Gentiles, 20 but that we write to them that they abstain
(a) from things contaminated by idols, and
(b) from fornication, and
(c) from what is strangled, and
(d) from blood; 21 for
(e) Moshe from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read (aloud) in the synagogues every Sabbath.”
Since the Apostles have already bound this set of entry-level pre-requisite requirements for citizenship in the Nation, this is also the exact same list of requirements that we must use.
Since this passage is also inspired Scripture, we have no alternative but to understand it, and then obey it.
Acts Fifteen: Inspired Point-of-Entry
The Apostles ruled that if the returning gentiles would simply abstain from four practices that are generally considered abominable in Hebraic thought, then they could be allowed to go into the synagogues on the Sabbath, as they would not be defiling a place set apart from the world, for worship.
The five requirements which new citizens in the Nation of Nazarene Israel had to obey were:
1. To abstain from idolatry;
2. To abstain from adultery;
3. To abstain from strangled meats;
4. To abstain from ‘blood;’ and then
5. To go into the synagogues and learn the rest of the Torah of Moshe, as the Torah is recited aloud in its entirety over the course of a year.
We will talk in a moment about what some of the specific terms mean (or meant). We will also talk about why the stipulation of coming up to speed in one year is important. However, at this time, we need to point out the vital necessity of using this set of requirements ONLY.
To establish (or perhaps to re-establish) this set of criteria for entry into the synagogues is merely to re-bind what the Apostles were led to bind some two thousand years ago. To bind this set of requirements as the standard for unity is simply to affirm Scripture.
Conversely, to attempt to establish unity on any other set of criteria is to repudiate Scripture, and to fly directly in its face. Moreover, to allow persons to come into spaces set apart for worship while not obeying these four necessary prerequisites is to defile that space’s set-apartness.
The reason these things are important is that if we attempt to unite upon the standards and guidelines established by the Apostles in Scripture, then YHWH will ultimately bless us. However, if we choose to do something other than what is recorded in Scripture, then we remain in the exact same position as before; and YHWH has no incentive to bless us in disobedience.
Details: Strangled Meats and ‘Blood’:
The first two prohibitions given in Acts Chapter Fifteen are fairly self-explanatory. Those who commit adultery and those who commit idolatry (which is spiritual adultery) are not allowed in spaces that are set-apart for the worship of YHWH: period. If these kinds of persons come to worship in a space set apart and cleansed for worship, the space is then defiled (and the synagogue leader is errant in his duties).
Points number three and four, however, are not always readily understood in the Western mind, and for this reason they require some explanation.
According to the face value of the Text, the prohibition against eating strangled meats is not necessarily a requirement to eat ‘kosher.’ Strong’s Concordance here renders the word ‘strangled’ as:
NT:4156 pniktos (pnik-tos’);
from NT:4155; throttled, i.e. (neuter concretely) an animal choked to death (not bled):
KJV – strangled.
Therefore, at least according to the P’shat (the literal face value of the Text), what the Apostles were actually prohibiting was the eating of meat that was killed through physical strangulation. The reason that this is prohibited is that killing an animal by strangulation (and not draining its blood) causes the blood to coagulate in the meat, leaving it with a revolting, disgusting taste (similar to German Bloodwurst). Since eating blood is forbidden, such meat can never be clean (e.g., Deuteronomy 12:16).
Next, in order to understand what the Apostles were really prohibiting when they prohibited ‘blood,’ we must remember that Hebraic thought treasures brevity, and compactness. Further, the Renewed Covenant is written in a Jewish idiom (slang). Just as the word “cool†does not always mean “cold†in modern English, “blood†did not mean a prohibition on eating blood.
Because unnecessary repetition is considered repulsive in Jewish thought, and since the prohibition against eating strangled meats already includes an implied prohibition against eating blood, the Apostles would not have listed the consumption of blood as a separate prohibition. For this reason, the prohibition against ‘blood’ in Acts Chapter Fifteen was more likely a prohibition against murder (see Genesis 4:10), and against breaking the Laws of Niddah (see Leviticus Chapter Fifteen and the Third Edition or newer of the Nazarene Israel study, beginning on page 273, “Torah Tradition and the Laws of Niddahâ€).
The reason that the Apostles would have required new converts to keep the Laws of Niddah right up front is for the exact same reason the Orthodox Jews do this today: it is because ritual purity in places of worship is vitally important in Hebraic thought.
It would be very easy to teach new converts there should be no contact between grown men and women, except for husband and wife (and then only half the month). If the new converts would obey this rule, then it would prevent the Apostles from becoming ritually defiled in their own synagogues; and it would also serve as an indicator of the new convert’s level of sincerity (and dedication). If the new convert was not willing to keep the Laws of Niddah, then he had not truly repented unto life; and therefore there was no reason to let him inside of the synagogue (which would only defile it).
Details: Synagogue on Sabbath
As we explain in the Nazarene Israel book, if one reads carefully, one can see that the reason the new converts were allowed to go into the synagogues after agreeing to keep only four initial minimum prerequisites is that they would then be able to hear a new part of the Torah of Moshe, as it was read aloud in the synagogue each week.
Ma’aseh (Acts) 15:21
21 “For Moshe from ancient generations has in every city those who preach him, since he is read in the synagogues every Sabbath.”
In the synagogues, a different portion of the Torah is read aloud each week. Over the course of a year, the whole of the Torah is read aloud.
Since the Torah of Moshe serves as the marital contract between Israel and its Husband, by sending the converts into the synagogues each week to hear the Torah read aloud, the converts would be able to hear a different part of the Torah each week (which they were then supposed to begin obeying). Thus, over the course of a year, the new converts would be exposed to the commandments dealing with physical circumcision, the festivals, tithes and offerings, tzitzit, beards, the Laws of Niddah, and more. And, as they were exposed to these commandments, the Apostles expected that these new converts would begin obeying them (as they serve as the marital contract, for all those who wish to be taken as part of His bride).
All of this was a modification of the Jewish gentile return procedure, which also calls for complete Torah obedience within a year (or two, at the outside).
Killing Them with Kindness?
One can easily justify the desire of most people to transition to full Torah obedience in a slow fashion. The only problem is that while this is easily understandable, it is contrary to Scripture.
One has to remember that the Renewed Covenant was not written in a vacuum. The unlearned fishermen and Shaul did not simply create a whole bunch of new traditions and practices out of thin air. Rather, as we explain in the Nazarene Israel book, the Apostles modified the existing Pharisaic (Orthodox) Jewish gentile return procedure, which calls for new converts to demonstrate their seriousness, by conforming to the whole of the Torah within one years’ time (or else be put outside of the assembly).
Those of us living in the West tend to think of ourselves as sovereign, independent and free human beings. This, however, stands in direct contradiction to what Scripture calls us: bondservants and slaves.
Galatia (Galatians) 1:10
10 For do I now persuade men, or Elohim? Or do I seek to please men? For if I still pleased men, I would not be a bondservant of Messiah.
Since most people do not come to the faith straightaway (but must be led slowly, over time), one can see a need for the existence of other transitional messianic groups, which serve a purpose as stepping-stones, to bring the people to full Torah-obedience slowly. However, it should be easy to see that any attempt to unify behind these non-obedient organizations will ultimately be futile.
YHWH commands that we keep all of His Torah (e.g. Leviticus 26:14-15, Numbers 15:40, Deuteronomy 5:29, etceteras). Further, the punishment for breaking His Torah is either death, and/or expulsion from His Land. How is it, then, that people expect Him to bless their efforts at uniting His people, on the basis of less than full Torah obedience?
Ironically, it will take time before most ‘Torah observant’ Ephraimites are ready to come to full Torah obedience. Ironically, it may also take them some time before they are ready even to obey the four initial prerequisites the Apostles bound for us in Acts Chapter 15 (which serve as the minimum standard for entry into the synagogues, while full Torah obedience is required within a year, or two at the most).
There can be no compromise on this issue, for this is what the Set-apart Scriptures require.
Let Us Go To Him
The Parable of the Prodigal Son tells us that when Ephraim returns to his Father, his Father sees him a long ways off, and runs to him.
Luqa (Luke) 15:20
20 “And rising up he came to his Father; but he yet being far away (from the Torah) his Father saw him, and was moved with pity; and running, He fell on his neck and fervently kissed him.â€
Notice, however, that the Prodigal Son still has to come all the way home, before he can receive his blessing.
For those who can see the irony in this situation, we need to remember that YHWH is the King of the Universe. He purposefully gave us a fleshly animal nature that desires to behave in ways that are the opposite of the Torah-obedient spiritual nature He wants us to develop; and the reason He does this is to see what we do.
Will we drag our heels, and look for ways to get out of obeying all aspects of His Torah? Or will we, as Yeshua did, say “Not My will, Father, but Yours, be done�
Luqa (Luke) 22:41-42
41 And He was withdrawn from them about a stone’s throw, and He knelt down and prayed,
42 saying, “Father, if it is Your will, take this cup away from Me; nevertheless not My will, but Yours, be done.”
If we can see that He desires us to lay down our lives in His service, and give up our own personal will in order to serve Him, then why not just do that? Why not run eagerly to His Throne?
With a salvation so great as this at stake, should we not throw ourselves down on the ground before Him, and ask how we can possibly become worthy to serve Him? And if so, then why does it seem so difficult for people to obey the four minimum entry requirements?
Requirements for Unity
In order to obey Torah, Nazarene Israel’s entry-level requirements for newly returning gentiles must be the same as those the Apostles bound.
1. To abstain from idolatry;
2. To abstain from adultery;
3. To abstain from strangled meats;
4. To abstain from blood (keep the Laws of Niddah); and
5. To go into the synagogues on the Sabbath and hear the rest of the Torah of Moshe being preached, with the intention of learning to obey it.
This can be the only lasting proposal for unity, as it is the only proposal that fulfills Scripture.
However, when we re-bind this as the list of requirements for entry into the synagogue (i.e., beginning citizenship), newcomers will probably want to know what it means, that they must ‘hear the rest of the Torah being preached, with an intention of learning to obey it.’ (In other words, they will want to know what they are letting themselves in for.)
When we are asked this question, we should tell them that while we seek to prove all things by His Word, some of the things we feel we have proved are that:
6. Since 1st John 5:7-8 is a later addition to the Text, Scripture does not speak of a ‘Trinity.’ Rather, Elohim is One (meaning United) (Deut. 6:4).
7. Yeshua is the Messiah, the Son of the Living Elohim (Matthew 16:16).
8. The sixty-six books of the Protestant Canon are divinely inspired, and are the highest authority in all matters of doctrine (2nd Timothy 3:16, 2 Peter 3:8).
9. Messiah Yeshua tells us plainly that He did not come to change even the smallest aspect of the Torah (the Laws of Moses) (Matthew 5:17-19). Therefore, the Law and the Prophets remain in effect.
10. There are three eternal signs of the Covenant (the Torah of Moshe). These are:
a. Physical Circumcision (Genesis 17:9-14)
b. The Sabbath (Exodus 31:17), and
c. The Passover (Exodus 12:13-15)
11. The calendar Yeshua kept during His ministry is the same as the calendar outlined in Torah; which is the Torah (i.e. ‘Agricultural New-Moon’) calendar.
12. The Third Commandment (not to desecrate the Name of the Creator) implies the need to use true Hebrew Names of both the Father and Son, as pronounced to the best of one’s ability and knowledge at that time (Exodus 20:7).
Further, in discussing the greater overall vision leading up to and beyond the Ingathering, the elders among us have been unable to escape the conclusion that there are some additional principles that need to be embraced:
13. That the doctrine known as the ‘Two House Theory’ is correct; and a failure to appreciate and understand the Two House Theory will invariably lead to a wrong dividing of the Word.
14. That the doctrine known as the ‘Post-Millennial Return’ of the Messiah is also correct; and a failure to appreciate and understand the Post-Millennial Return doctrine will invariably lead to a failure to take actions that Scripture calls for.
15. That after we have received the gift of Eternal Life, one of the proofs that we are dead to our flesh (and its desires) is that we will do all we can to build the Messiah’s kingdom, here on earth. This requires us to give both of our time, and of our money; and this does not constitute a burden, but a privilege.
16. That while the Melchizedekian priesthood should have adequate funds, the Melchizedekian priests themselves should own nothing.
17. That complacency in learning and obeying the Torah is not of His Spirit.
We can easily imagine a much more detailed list than this. However, to start with, if we will but corporately re-bind (re-affirm for ourselves) the first five requirements that the Apostles bound for us in Acts Chapter Fifteen, and then follow through with the additional twelve points (numbers 6 through 17), the Ephraimite people will eventually find themselves formed as a ‘Stick;’ and this will lead first to nationhood, and then, ultimately, to the Ingathering and the subsequent religious unification.
Abba YHWH, please make us worthy of this great task, not for ourselves, but only for Your mighty Name.
B’Shem Yeshua Meshicheinu,
Amein.
The article is very enlightening. But how do we push this information unto our people who believe that the white language, Nigger or Nigga, which differs from Ngr, netger, engur, etc; which had a totally different meaning. The more I research this topic, the more I see that we are and have always been dealing with two types of languages. Thus, makes me ponder the question: Is it right to call ourselves: Niggah, Niggaz, or nigga? I think educating ourselves would help a lot. Yes, many of our younger Black men and women have not opened the books of history to gain some type of understanding on the word: nigger or nigga, which have been bestowed upon us depicting our colour negativity. My foster mother would always say, “A person have the right to say what they want, it’s their mouth!” Though, I always hated when she said that, but reality kicked in as you grew. No, man has control over anyone but themselves. Maybe the solution is to put this information out there just as much as Europeans have diligently blanket out history only to mislead us into a evolutional inferior history; only then can help bring about some understanding and hopefully change of mind. But, we have a lot of work to do. As today’s generation is a lost civilization in the twenty first century.
May someone help me dig the origins and meaning of the word Azania. I have learned that it is connected to the word Zinj and Azan, but I don’t find any useful meaningful information on this regard, Please help
~Tower~
Acts13 in the King James bible states… In the church that was in ANTIOCH their were certain TEACHERS and PROPHETS as SIMEON and BARNABUS called NIGER.
I guess Niger in this sentence is referring to a river huh? LOL
Good work Pianke. Continue to dissiminate the Truth. I have an Ethiopian friend who told me that the word King is pronounce NEGUS in her language. Go figure…
Keep postin positive info Haddasah. Our twin brother (Esau) will understand soon enough… LOL
TruthHurtsFeelTheStab replied:
PS, the word for “god†in Egyptian is *naTaru, idiot. It became Coptic “nouteâ€. There’s no “g†in it unless you’re hooked-on-phonics.
Truth hurts is foolish. NTR is the operative letters in Nataru. Original egyptian languages had no vowels in it. Yet NTR is still there. U just proved Pianke’s point