WHEN EUROPEANS WERE SLAVES: RESEARCH SUGGESTS WHITE SLAVERY WAS MUCH MORE COMMON THAN PREVIOUSLY BELIEVED
COLUMBUS, Ohio – A new study suggests that a million or more European Christians were enslaved by Muslims in North Africa between 1530 and 1780 – a far greater number than had ever been estimated before.
In a new book, Robert Davis, professor of history at Ohio State University, developed a unique methodology to calculate the number of white Christians who were enslaved along Africa’s Barbary Coast, arriving at much higher slave population estimates than any previous studies had found.
Most other accounts of slavery along the Barbary coast didn’t try to estimate the number of slaves, or only looked at the number of slaves in particular cities, Davis said. Most previously estimated slave counts have thus tended to be in the thousands, or at most in the tens of thousands. Davis, by contrast, has calculated that between 1 million and 1.25 million European Christians were captured and forced to work in North Africa from the 16th to 18th centuries. Davis’s new estimates appear in the book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800 (Palgrave Macmillan).
“Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland.”
“Much of what has been written gives the impression that there were not many slaves and minimizes the impact that slavery had on Europe,” Davis said. “Most accounts only look at slavery in one place, or only for a short period of time. But when you take a broader, longer view, the massive scope of this slavery and its powerful impact become clear.”
Davis said it is useful to compare this Mediterranean slavery to the Atlantic slave trade that brought black Africans to the Americas. Over the course of four centuries, the Atlantic slave trade was much larger – about 10 to 12 million black Africans were brought to the Americas. But from 1500 to 1650, when trans-Atlantic slaving was still in its infancy, more white Christian slaves were probably taken to Barbary than black African slaves to the Americas, according to Davis.
“One of the things that both the public and many scholars have tended to take as given is that slavery was always racial in nature – that only blacks have been slaves. But that is not true,” Davis said. “We cannot think of slavery as something that only white people did to black people.”During the time period Davis studied, it was religion and ethnicity, as much as race, that determined who became slaves.
“Enslavement was a very real possibility for anyone who traveled in the Mediterranean, or who lived along the shores in places like Italy, France, Spain and Portugal, and even as far north as England and Iceland,” he said.
Pirates (called corsairs) from cities along the Barbary Coast in north Africa – cities such as Tunis and Algiers – would raid ships in the Mediterranean and Atlantic, as well as seaside villages to capture men, women and children. The impact of these attacks were devastating – France, England, and Spain each lost thousands of ships, and long stretches of the Spanish and Italian coasts were almost completely abandoned by their inhabitants. At its peak, the destruction and depopulation of some areas probably exceeded what European slavers would later inflict on the African interior.
Although hundreds of thousands of Christian slaves were taken from Mediterranean countries, Davis noted, the effects of Muslim slave raids was felt much further away: it appears, for example, that through most of the 17th century the English lost at least 400 sailors a year to the slavers.
Even Americans were not immune. For example, one American slave reported that 130 other American seamen had been enslaved by the Algerians in the Mediterranean and Atlantic just between 1785 and 1793.
Davis said the vast scope of slavery in North Africa has been ignored and minimized, in large part because it is on no one’s agenda to discuss what happened.
The enslavement of Europeans doesn’t fit the general theme of European world conquest and colonialism that is central to scholarship on the early modern era, he said. Many of the countries that were victims of slavery, such as France and Spain, would later conquer and colonize the areas of North Africa where their citizens were once held as slaves. Maybe because of this history, Western scholars have thought of the Europeans primarily as “evil colonialists” and not as the victims they sometimes were, Davis said.
Davis said another reason that Mediterranean slavery has been ignored or minimized has been that there have not been good estimates of the total number of people enslaved. People of the time – both Europeans and the Barbary Coast slave owners – did not keep detailed, trustworthy records of the number of slaves. In contrast, there are extensive records that document the number of Africans brought to the Americas as slaves.
So Davis developed a new methodology to come up with reasonable estimates of the number of slaves along the Barbary Coast. Davis found the best records available indicating how many slaves were at a particular location at a single time. He then estimated how many new slaves it would take to replace slaves as they died, escaped or were ransomed.
“The only way I could come up with hard numbers is to turn the whole problem upside down – figure out how many slaves they would have to capture to maintain a certain level,” he said. “It is not the best way to make population estimates, but it is the only way with the limited records available.”
Putting together such sources of attrition as deaths, escapes, ransomings, and conversions, Davis calculated that about one-fourth of slaves had to be replaced each year to keep the slave population stable, as it apparently was between 1580 and 1680. That meant about 8,500 new slaves had to be captured each year. Overall, this suggests nearly a million slaves would have been taken captive during this period. Using the same methodology, Davis has estimated as many as 475,000 additional slaves were taken in the previous and following centuries.
The result is that between 1530 and 1780 there were almost certainly 1 million and quite possibly as many as 1.25 million white, European Christians enslaved by the Muslims of the Barbary Coast.
Davis said his research into the treatment of these slaves suggests that, for most of them, their lives were every bit as difficult as that of slaves in America.
“As far as daily living conditions, the Mediterranean slaves certainly didn’t have it better,” he said. While African slaves did grueling labor on sugar and cotton plantations in the Americas, European Christian slaves were often worked just as hard and as lethally – in quarries, in heavy construction, and above all rowing the corsair galleys themselves. Davis said his findings suggest that this invisible slavery of European Christians deserves more attention from scholars.
“We have lost the sense of how large enslavement could loom for those who lived around the Mediterranean and the threat they were under,” he said. “Slaves were still slaves, whether they are black or white, and whether they suffered in America or North Africa.”
#
Contact Robert Davis, Davis.711@osu.edu
Written by Jeff Grabmeier, Grabmeier.1@osu.edu
——————————————————————————–
Thanks, Nehesy, for the translation of the Egyptian site. it is important to hear that all of those rulers were found to have a familial relationship through the genetic analysis.
You’re welcome dear Dana.
This study is indeed a definite (genetical) proof about the africaness of ancient Egypt.
Unfortunately they didn’t describe the complete study in this paper. May be we could get it by contacting directly the University of Cairo.
Kind Regards
Hi Nehesy,
Yes contacting them might be a good idea. i might try to do that this summer.
“Ketama Sanhaja, Masmuda, Nafusa, Zenata” lived near black african and were in constant war with the ghana empire and songhai empire and were invaded by them many times…. it can explain their dark complexion i guess….
I was glancing through this blog again and I happened upon the above note from Karim in October. Too bad i hadn’t noticed it before. The Zenata at the time of Islam were Numidia coastal Algeria. The Masmuda described by Ibn Butlan (Iraqi christian Physician) of the 10th to 11th century as Black and Abu Shama of Syria later and their largest tribe Ghomara were lat ethe time known only from their have livedin the Riff region of Morocca for the most part now occupied by fair -skinned Berber speakers who look like Europeans with some African blood. The Sanhaja and Ketama were also for those who looked at any history were of course also from northern Algeria and Tunisia. They are also mentioned earlier by Romans in the Atlas as Uakutameni and on the Tunisia coast as Mucuteni, hence the modern word Imaketan today for the eastern Tuareg.
The same Ibn Butlan who calls the Sanhaja (Lamtuna Lamt, Lam, Hawara) and Masmuda, and Ketama or Maketa black also calls the Beja or Begawi of Nubia golden colored. This shows what was meant by the designation black.
it also plainly shows why Ibn Qutaybah places the Berbers in the category of “blacks”.
I am happy because I get to learn about curtain things like this but at the same time I am angry. Now don’t read this and think I’m angry because I’m weird, because I’m not weird. A person who watches his or her favor ate team play in a GAME of pigskin(so called “football”) or any other sport and gets angry because the team that they were rooting for lost is weird. Now, I know you cant change the past and complaining wont change anything either but man! do I hate most of the moors! Not only do I hate most of them because of their ancient civilizations that they turned their backs on and ruined in Alkebulan(Africa) but because of the completely unnecessary harm they inflicted on my Caucasian relatives. And threw many reading of history I learned that the moors not only enslave the Caucasians but they also enslaved people of their own ethnicity(the so called “Blacks” Subsaharan and Kush(Tobians, Eritreans, Somalians, Nubians, ect) in Alkebulan(Africa)) and they also helped destroy and completely screw over ancient Subsaharan and Kush so called ‘Black’ civilizations like the ancient advanced civilization of Kemet(Egypt) in North Alkebulan and Timbuktu in West Alkebulan(Africa). Most moors were tirants and what most people would call sell outs to there own kind but not all of them were bad. Some moors were against the enslavement of their people and Caucasians. There were a certain group of moors that were kind of like a secret organization called the Hassassins. The Hassassin moors specialized in assassinating their religious and political enemies in stealth. Sometimes they would kill their targets in broad daylight in order to strike fear into their enemies.
Indeed, the Africans, the Moors were the first to enslave. The Euros later threw off the shackles of his Moorish submission and reversed that power dynamic, slowly, over many centuries.
Black Moors had white slaves first and for longer. Moulay Ishmael needs to become a household name.
Along with the Latin word “Mauri” used to describe the native people living in Mauretania is the Greek adjective “mauros, -e, -o” (??????, -?, -?; pronounced “mavros” today) meaning black, dark, brown, overcast, tanned, bruised, black and blue, gloomy,
sooty, grimy, smudgy; i.e., various shades of darkness between brown and black.