In the 6th century they had many names, Cagots, Gahets, Gafets in France; Agotes, Gafos in Spain; and Cacons, Cahets, Caqueux and Caquins in Brittany.
During the middle ages they were popularly looked upon as cretins, lepers, heretics and even as cannibals.
They were shunned and hated; were allotted separate quarters in towns, called cagoteries, and lived in wretched huts in the country distinct from the villages. Excluded from all political and social rights, they were only allowed to enter a church by a special door, and during the service a rail separated them from the other worshippers. Either they were altogether forbidden to partake of the sacrament, or the holy wafer was handed to them on the end of a stick, while a receptacle for holy water was reserved for their exclusive use.
They were compelled to wear a distinctive dress, to which, in some places, was attached the foot of a goose or duck (whence they were sometimes called Canards). And so pestilential was their touch considered that it was a crime for them to walk the common road barefooted. The only trades allowed them were those of butcher and carpenter, and their ordinary occupation was wood-cutting.
Their language is merely a corrupt form of that spoken around them; but a Teutonic origin seems to be indicated by their fair complexions and blue eyes. Their crania have a normal development; their cheek-bones are high; their noses prominent, with large nostrils; their lips straight; and they are marked by the absence of the auricular lobules.
The origin of the Cagots is undecided. Littre defines them as “a people of the Pyrenees affected with a kind of cretinism.”
It has been suggested that they were descendants of the Visigoths, and Michael derives the name from caws (dog) and Goth. But opposed to this etymology is the fact that the word cagot is first found in the for of Beam not earlier than 1551.
Marca, in his Histoire de Bearn, holds [a most unlikely theory] that the word signifies “hunters of the Goths,” and that the Cagots are descendants of the Saracens. Others made them descendants of the Albigenses.
The old MSS call them Chretiens or Chrestiaas, and from this it has been argued that they were Visigoths who originally lived as Christians among the Gascon pagans.
A far more probable explanation of their name “Chretiens” is to be found in the fact that in medieval times all lepers were known as pauperes Christi, and that, Goths or not, these Cagots were affected in the middle ages with a particular form of leprosy or a condition resembling it. Thus would arise the confusion between Christians and Cretins.
To-day their descendants are not more subject to goitre and cretinism than those dwelling around them, and are recognized by tradition and not by features or physical degeneracy.
It was not until the French Revolution that any steps were taken to ameliorate their lot, but to-day they no longer form a class, but have been practically lost sight of in the general peasantry.
See Francisque Michel, Histoire des races maudites de France et d’Espagne (Paris, 1846); Abbe Venuti, Recherches sur les Cahets de Bordeaux (1754); Bulletins de la societe anthropologique (1861, 1867, 1868, 1871); Annales medico-psychologiques (Jan. 1867); Lagneau, Questionnaire sur l’ethnologie de la France; Paul Raymond, Mceurs bearnaises (Pau, 1872); V. de Rochas, Les Parias de France et d’Espagne (Cagots et Bohemiens) (Paris, 1877); J. Hack Tuke, Jour. Anthropological Institute (vol. ix., 1880).
I don’t see the mutant albinos,better known as Cagots commenting on the real issue,their history,one i may add slips into the don’t tell category.You so-called whites no such people,can’t bring yourselves to face that these people the accursed are you. Leprosy cursed white as snow. Good thing we won’t have to be bothered with you much longer as of 2000 you CAGOTS are on a downward spiral.As of your disease there has been predicted by your people that whites will have 0 population growth from now on and when you mate outside your leper race that will be adding to ours,and further wiping out your cursed one. Why don’t you want to comment on the leper race that is you. Not talking about it won’t make it go away.Just can’t face it huh? it will all be over before you know it.ALL WHITE PEOPLE (BLACKS THAT TURNED WHITE WITH THE DISEASE OF LEPROSY) ARE THE DECENDANTS OF THE CAGOTS.The most hated in the world why is that?And the most hated of all CAGOTS are American whites,even foreign born whites hate American whites. How did we get stuck with them? The sickest in mind of the sickest is Americas legacy.It seems you know all of afrikans history tell me how you turned white as snow. Won’t comment on that will you,cause you know it’s true you are Cagots,the accursed race.
Here’s an article that tells PART of the Truth:
The untouchables of FRANCE: How swarthy Pyrenean race persecuted for centuries are still being abused today
By Tom Knox
Last updated at 10:58 AM on 10th June 2010
Comments (12) Add to My Stories
The last untouchable in Europe: Marie Pierre Manet-Beauzac is a Cagot
She is one of the last of her kind — a living memory of troubled times, when the most horrific acts of violence were committed against generations of her vulnerable people.
But, sitting in her suburban living room in Tarbes, in southern France, Marie Pierre Manet-Beauzac could be Madam Everywoman.
She smiles wistfully, pats her neat dark hair, and shoos her polite, friendly children from the room.
And yet her background and her genes conceals a truly extraordinary tale: the tale of a cursed and unique race, roundly abused and attacked — and all this in supposedly civilised France, within living memory.
Few people have heard this tale. It is one of the concealed and startling horrors of European history, a story I am documenting in my new book.
And here, on this quiet summer afternoon, Marie wants to tell me the story of her benighted people.
So who is Marie? She is a Cagot. That means she is quite possibly the last of a breed of mysterious darkskinned European ‘untouchables’ who were cruelly abused as second-class citizens for at least a thousand years, mainly in the Pyrenees, but also in neighbouring regions along the western French coast, up to Brittany.
These outcasts, the Cagots, were thought to be ‘different’ in the most horrible ways — stupid, diseased, and given to criminality. Some claimed they were bisexual and that they had black magic powers.
Wild rumours talked of them emitting enough pungent body heat to shrivel an apple merely by clutching it, others said their veins ran with green blood — blood which oozed from their belly buttons on Good Friday.
Cagots were supposed to have strange heads, webbed feet and misshapen ears (‘Cagot ear’ is a medical term still used today: indicating ears without lobes).
The fiercer rumours went beyond sickliness and deformation: allegations of psychosis, murder, and even cannibalism were not unknown.
Unsurprisingly, such a wretched and ‘infectious’ people were shunned. Many prohibitions were enacted so that the Cagots could be avoided by the ‘pure people’ — the ordinary French peasantry.
But why were they so mistreated? Even today the answers to these questions are shrouded in eerie silence. And one of the reasons is guilt: the Cagots themselves, the survivors of the persecutions, have opted to remain hidden. They have assimilated, outmarried and changed their names, hoping to perhaps — finally — escape their pariah status.
Moreover, modern French society prefers not to discuss the abuse heaped upon Marie Pierre’s ancestors. The Cagots are like a terrible memory, buried in the French psyche.
Of course, France is not alone in mistreating ‘outcasts’.
Japan still has a class of people called the Burakumin: these untouchables are condemned to the lowest jobs and the dirtiest slums.
Persecuted: A Cagot man. Until recently they were forced to live restricted lives
The peculiar olive-skinned Melungeons of America’s Appalachian mountains are a similar example, who are descended from Ottoman Turks; likewise the incestuous and deformed Matignons Blancs of Guadeloupe, or the beautiful Basters, or ‘Bastards’, of Namibia.
It is an unhappy truth: scapegoated tribes, peoples and communities can be found across the world. Yet the savagery inflicted on the Cagots is unusually cruel — and especially mysterious.
This is why Marie is so important. As maybe the last Cagot in France — certainly the last Cagot willing to admit her bizarre ‘racial identity’ — Marie Pierre has been tracing her family tree. And she has some compelling insights.
Staring nervously at the carpet of her living room, she tells me how her own investigations began.
‘When I first had children, I wanted, like many mothers and fathers, to know where we came from. So I started researching, I traced my family tree back through the generations — through many villages in the Pyrenees.
‘I noticed certain names and trades in my background, lots of carpenters, basket-makers, ropemakers, all of them humble people who lived in the “wrong” parts of town. Soon I realised I had this identity which was barely discussed in France — I was a Cagot.’
Marie outlines the few known facts about the Cagots. As a people they first emerge from the mists of antiquity, in legal documents dating from about AD1,000. The Cagots’ provenance is so opaque partly because the Cagots themselves have deliberately disappeared from view.
Following the French Revolution, the laws against Cagots were formally abandoned — around the same time, plenty of Cagots pillaged local archives and destroyed official records of their ancestry.
After 1789, many emigrated, to escape the ongoing hatred and abuse, which persisted in the countryside. This hatred had become virtually endemic — records dating from as far back as the 13th century show they were already regarded as a deeply inferior caste: the ‘untouchables’ of western France.
From medieval times through to the 19th century, the Cagots were divided from the general peasantry in several ways.
They had their own reserved urban districts: usually on the malarial side of the river, far away from the village centres, a safe distance from markets, taverns and shops. These dismal ghettoes were known as Cagoteries.
Traces of them can still be found in remote Pyrenean communities.
But the Cagots were not completely isolated from French life.
They were allowed, for instance, to enter markets on certain days — usually Mondays — so the normal people would know when to stay indoors, to avoid the ‘polluted’ outcasts. But if they chose the wrong day to go trading they would be brutally punished — beaten and flogged back to their ghettoes.
Even when they were allowed into the towns, Cagots had to obey strict rules. They were not allowed to walk in the middle of the street. If they encountered a normal person, they had to shrink to the side of the road, and stand quiet and silent in the gutters.
Cagots were forbidden to go barefoot, as the taint of their skin might infect the pure people. Eating or bathing with normal people was totally verboten In an uncanny parallel to Nazi treatment of the Jews, Cagots had to wear a symbol pinned to their chest, a red or yellow goose’s foot, either real, or made of cloth (the foot symbolised their own ‘webbed toes’).
They were also forbidden from carrying knives or other weapons and were forced to wear hoods, to hide their faces.
As Marie says, the most poignant bigotry occurred in the churches.
‘The Cagots were devoutly Christian, yet the Catholic church treated them with contempt.
In the church buildings, they had to use their own water fonts, and their own entrances. These doors were usually set low, so the Cagots were forced to stoop as they entered, emphasising their lowly status.’
At least 60 Pyrenean churches still have ‘Cagot’ entrances.
Marie continues: ‘When the priest gave communion he went to the special Cagot pews — and he would throw the holy bread to them like they were dogs.’
Kinder priests used a long wooden spoon, so they could carefully hand out the communion wafer, without touching the accursed outcasts.
The Cagot pariahs were forbidden to join most trades so they made coffins for the dead. They also became expert roofers and carpenters: ironically they built many of the Pyrenean churches from which they were partly excluded.
Marie Pierre sighs. ‘Marriage between Cagots and non-Cagots was, of course, almost impossible.’
Nonetheless, love affairs across the divide did occur — there are melancholy songs from the 16th and 17th centuries, lamenting these tragic misalliances.
The Cagots could be subject to horrific cruelty from their persecuters.
In the early 18th century a prosperous Cagot in the Landes region was caught using the font reserved for non-Cagots — his hand was briskly chopped off and nailed to the church door.
Another Cagot who dared to farm the ‘wrong’ fields had his feet pierced with hot iron spikes.
In Lourdes, any Cagot who broke the rules had two strips of flesh — weighing precisely two ounces each — ripped from each side of his spine.
Marie tells me: ‘If there was any crime in a village the Cagot was usually blamed. Some were burned at the stake.’
Even in death, discrimination persisted — the Cagots were buried in their own humble cemeteries on the chilly northern side of the church — there is still one in Bentayou-Sérée, a tiny village near the Spanish border It is an extraordinary tale. So who were the Cagots, racially? Does their ancestry explain their status?
Despite their mysteriousness, there are historical accounts that afford an intriguing if bewildering glimpse of Cagot origins.
Contemporary sources describe them as being short, dark and stocky. Confusingly, some others saw them as blonde and blue eyed.
Francisque Michel’s 1847 work Histoire Des Races Maudites (History Of The Cursed Races) was one of the first studies.
He found Cagots had ‘frizzy brown hair’.
He also found at least 10,000 Cagots still scattered across Gascony and Navarre, and still suffering repression — nearly 70 years after the Cagot caste was supposedly ‘abolished’.
Since Michel’s pioneering work, various historians have tried to solve the Cagot mystery. One theory is that they were lepers, or ‘contagious cretins’.
That would explain the rules against Cagots ‘touching’ anything used by non-Cagots.
However, this theory falls down on the many contemporary descriptions of the Cagots being perfectly healthy and strong, even handsome.
And Cagot skeletons, when unearthed, show none of the bonelesions associated with lepers.
Another idea, as Marie Pierre remarks, is that the Cagots were slaves of the Goths who inundated France in the Dark Ages. From here, etymologists have deduced that ‘ca-got’ comes from ‘cani Gothi’ — ‘dogs of the Goths’.
Or the word ‘Cagot’ may simply derive from ‘cack’, or ‘caca’ — a very basic term of abuse.
Recently, a new theory has emerged, propounded by writer Graham Robb. In his book The Discovery Of France, Robb suggests the Cagots were originally a guild of skilled medieval woodworkers.
He argues the bigotry against them was initially commercial rivalry which developed into something more sinister.
Robb says the geographic spread is explained by Cagot workers congregating in places associated with the routes for Christian pilgrims, where there was plenty of work for coopers and roofers.
Marie Pierre herself has no doubts where she comes from: ‘I believe the Cagots are descendants of dark Moorish soldiers, left over from the 8th century Muslim invasion of Spain and France, who interbred with the locals, maybe the Basques.’
It is certainly true that the Basques are known, like the Cagots, for having unusual earlobes.
Marie-Pierre goes on: ‘You can see that I am quite dark myself, and my daughter Sylvia is the darkest in her class.’
Her theory of the Cagots being partly descended from Muslims is supported by several French experts as it neatly explains the religious disapproval of the Cagots.
And the idea that they are mixed race chimes with the fate of those other outcast groups.
I ask Marie Pierre if she will let me take a picture of her daughter Sylvia. She shakes her head.
‘I’m sorry, but no. It is OK for me to admit where I come from. But if people knew about my children’s background… it might be difficult for them.’
She gazes out of the window, at the distant green Pyrenees.
‘Even now there is a shame in being Cagot. Even now, the hatred lingers…’
Tom Knox’s The Marks Of Cain is published by HarperCollins.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1285450/The-untouchables-FRANCE-How-swarthy-Pyrenean-race-persecuted-centuries-abused-today.html#ixzz16mqhS4Ut
Marie is not the last cagots queen elizabeth family are a part of this black impostors. All of the so-called royalty are cagots getting these titles from their colored ancestors ” the black queen sophie” was how the counterfeit white cagots came to power. All married into black ROYAL families,they know what they are reptilians. Death is their legacy. Truth is the creator on earth freedom,then things begin to flip,a new world order so to speak with the rightful owners in power,and those guilty punished. Remember when you dig a grave always dig two. Cause it won’t be long before you join the one you dug the the first one for. Lack of melanin is their curse,and they hate the original for being blessed with it. So we should know in over 500 years of abuse at the cursed blacks hands nothing has changed,and never will are we really ready for 400 more years of the same thing by a people who will never change,not in their nature to love,they were not made by us for that,to be noncolored means something is missing. And love was never in them nor respect. Look at what their short time rule has done to the planet,our childrens planet. Death follows them and they are the living dead.Once they die they don’t come back,their soulless bodies wander in another dimension. Cursed can’t go home. All they were made to do is kill,can’t you figure that out by now. One of them persecutes you,the other of them cries foul,but they all have the same goal. The changing places of the dogs with the one that made them.Whereas the cursed becomes the blessed with their cagot jesus leper,looks just like them cursed white as snow,he is not,the creators dog oh i mean god same thing. We have been played,by cagots. Just how long this foolishness goes on is up to the creator,the colored people who started this whole world off. Until then it can only get worse for us slaves,cause our masters are having too much fun at our expense,and it is our cowardly fault. Knowledge is power and also a wake up call,what about the creators children,we owe nothing to no one,we are owed. Time to fight for that wrong for our children. No one can or will save us but us.
Wow some serious racists on this site not all white people are evil my dad is white German and he is a wonderful living father in fact he was more loving then my mother who is half Cherokee (non-white) not all colored people are loving good people good and evil hate and love can be found in all races!!!
No race, or group of people is intrinsically evil. That’s something you should have understood by now. But a race or a group of people can be described or referred to as having done a huge amount of evil. Now guess what race or group of people has perpetrated, more than anyone else, evil deeds on the face of this earth. Let’s see how honest a person you are.
If you want to talk about racism and evil please visit stormfront, niggermania, chimpout, http://www.martinlutherking.org, RIP Trayvon Martin on Facebook and the millions of racist websites created by pink, pig skinned Europeans spreading hatred and murder (genocide) and re-enslavement of Africa and her descendants. I will begin to believe that most whites are not evil and racist when majority of whites denounce the racist amongst them and stop claiming that the so called black people’s reaction to the racism of their fellow whites is, “the reason why racism exist” and “black people are they only racist alive.” Additionally, I will cease to believe that most whites are not evil and racist when whites like you ignore the obvious, blatant racism of your fellow whites while belittling, degrading and devaluing the experience of black people who claim to have experienced racism of whites like you.
Here is a youtube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3iLw_gKluw of a white man physically and verbally assaulting a black woman, spitting on her and trying to steal her property when his actions was defended by his fellow whites. Now, imagine if the beast who did this was a black man and the woman who he did this was white, whites all over the world would not only be asking for the death penalty, many would try to kill him or have him killed. And last but not least, the video would be played by every media outlet around the world as a reminder that black people are not only evil, they are full of racial hatred for whites and are not human beings. That black man would have been tried as a hatemonger with no questions asked.
Yet white police officers fucked (word used for emphasis of the beast like nature of this crime) a black man with a broom stick while arresting him and they are not charged with hate crimes nor did they lose their jobs. Only the white minds would think it is okay to keep such animals on the police force because a) the police officers did fuck anyone whites consider to be humans with a broom stick. b) the police officers did not fuck anyone with the broom stick whites hold in any form of esteem. I cannot say whites regard black people even as animals because whites can relate more to animals they can black people and are very protective of animals.
But course there are elements of hypocrisy in everything whites do. In the white mind, Michael Vick, represents all black people and all black people engage in dog fight betting despite this being a popular sport amongst whites more than black people and whites’ history of known cruelty and genocide of certain animals they hunted for sport. White girl drowning puppies in a river is an isolated incidents and no death threats were made against her. Yet every white on the planet wanted Michael Vick dead for doing dog fight betting.
Hi June, I think you’ve misunderstood me. The answer to my riddle was: WHITE FOLK.
(Now guess what race or group of people has perpetrated, more than anyone else, evil deeds on the face of this earth).
And by the way, I totally agree with you, not because you seem to be a black person, but because what you said are objectively true. Cheers… 🙂
I know that, SD. My post was directed at Native Pride and that is why I said, “your fellow whites” and “whites like you” in the post in reference to s/he/it because s/he/it admitted to being white.
I really don’t care for his claim of having a native grandmother. Why is it that non of these whites who claim Native ancestry never have a native grandfather – no horny native men screwing white women back then? Racist whites pretend to be all kinds of races online to get their racist points across. Go to name any race forum and you will see a number of whites pretending to be that race making disparaging remarks about black people or whichever race they are hostile towards. On many occasion I have had what seemed to be white nationalists calling me nigger/monkey/ape/sheboon or whatever names their childish minds can invent, telling me that I eat fried chicken and watermelon while claiming they are mixed black or Asian or whatever. I don’t think anyone from Asia would make fun of a black person due to dietary choices, especially, since Asians probably consume more watermelon than black people. I know the person is white based on the type of insults they throw at me or black people or others and besides, only the white ones seem to come up with the new names and new way of throwing racial insults. I live in an area heavily populated by Asians from all parts of Asia and once the watermelon goes on sale, they buy it by the cart loads. People from warmer climates eat watermelon during summer as a way of cooling down their bodies. I never understood why whites make fun of others for dietary choices.
I grew up around many different so called races and nationalities. Thus, based on this experience, I know what some races will or will not say towards a black person. In my experience, the so called racism of the non white races towards black people has very little to do with them thinking black people are not human but it has more to do with black people being darker and/or the way black people are portrayed on television and the way black people are treated by whites in their new country. According to Teresa Williams whenever we interact with a white person we, “encounter their plague of externalized racism and insecurity regarding [our] cultural identity and how it either challenges or minimizes their own.” I do not experience this with the other so called races because me/we/black people are of no threat to them. Additionally, based on my experience, the whole notion of black people not being human is mostly restricted to the disillusion of whites. Even the born European whites tend to be less hostile towards me than North American whites. I can only speak of experiences of going to school in an area heavily populated by North Americans whites or working in a department heavily populated by North American whites versus working in departments populated by European whites.
The North American whites are more hostile, clannish and exclusionary when it comes to other races. I even had a incident where at the end of the school year, a white teacher sent out invitations to all the whites students to meet at pub to celebrate. I only found out when a white male student – a human being, not all people are humans asked me if I am attending and didn’t I get professor so and so invitation by email. Neither me or the East Indians or the Africans received an invitation from her.
In any event, Native Pride exhibited typical Euro North American behaviour and that is to blame to victims or the people who are merely reacting to the years of racist/psychotic abuse by whites and to claim that the victims are now the real racist.
White people make fun of other races because in other to feel that they exist, they have to be harming or degrading someone else. The most amazing thing is how they(as a collectivity) would do evil while convincing themselves and the world(through deception) that they are the good guys. You know, there was a time when I really wanted to believe that it be impossible that a whole race could be the main instrument of Lucifer, but the more I learn, the more I understand that I was wrong. Of course not all white are evil, but the fact is, they are the racial group that Lucifer chose to subdue humanity. And if they had to succeed, they had to neutralize God’s people(the Blacks). That’s why we are their target N° 1. Nevertheless evil always destroys itself eventually. It might take time, but we Black shall rise again to build God’s Kingdom.
who created the races,who doesnt know what white or bleac means,yes the euro cannibles ate all the taino men original man here fro olmec washitaw .thereare nune older then us .when u give children fire they burn things with it .tthe prussians ,, germans created all the slurs ,,spic .wop,dyke faggot from cagot arnold.. black negger,,they not practicing race its being practiced on them ..an they are forced to play from the black side of the chess board.these are the real peple from america first branded neegro ,,the so called natives now are the a;lbions who have stolen a our land u say are so nice ,,easy to sa when u get the jesse jackson percy suttin boule passes ,,native jack sonss sons of jack paid to tell the people they are colors ..camels eye treaty ..this who stole your land an said allll of u came from the east abegro negro .we was here first an in 1492 people started racing over here to escape ,,these are the cannibles who came 1492 ,, practicing pedophelia ,,this is soo much muur than race ,,here is one who wil tell is we colored,,..the reasin the cherokees gor marched away is cause they wasnt the oroiginal ones but the camels eye treaty replacements with the euroo mix ,,they would have baby an claim land fron another half blood ,,started with pocahontas in hizzzz lie story ,,callin all us dark ones food they ate us like deer /buffalo .,u dad is not white ,,free white sovereign does not mean caucsion race or aryan race .blacks la 4th ,,the adjectivesan vebs forced on us as nouns dont come from within ,,can you speak to me in cherokee ,,the so called sxtinct language of theeast coadt , it wa killed with us now caled negro who was here first an euru hd used the racve to hide that whule iue german donswear itr crowns in england ,,the fez ,,german civlies by free masonry,,they dont practice racism they are victimS of ut like getting hIt by a car in our land by un authorized albions racing taKING OVER ,,uare the racist thinking u or yur father iswhite cause he pale pink red ,,so after our queens got rapewe had red indians thats meant they got raped by european cannibles,,whu invented race not us the muurs,,native if WE arE half cherokee then here europ deports mexicans that are apaches ,,now here this afteww2 pow from germany were in the midwest jails ,,by oklahoma ,reervatuins ,an thy let all them out into piblic to nixunto piblic ,,the busH family ran AMERICAN NAZI PARTY PRESCOTT BUSH ,, my family lives on peekskill res an shinnicock.sellouts got marche after they got th sharaka cherokee to say they was negro after1865 ,we spoke latin arabic an cherokee .not english before being forced into christianity , color an being stripped of ourr titles an given names called free negro,,there no such thing as a free negro like there no sardine unless i its captured in a can ,those wwho rreplaced my posiion wit the fake white lie is the only practtiioner by choice an the victim by default,onlly tose whi lieda told u they was white practice ur race ,,we run aay from it cause itsti steal out land an have us work it like in america .hiuter is rothchilds sin ,,jew thar hates jews on meth ,u father knowswe riled gernany first when ut wasnt called germany an africa was akebulan .,mo ome called themself indian beefore1492 yu u are notr indigo or forgot abiut thedark before the light srased by rrace whutewasahed by race,,,they came over on race we had to be overcome by race ,hizzzzztory blame the lies as the cause dont blame the effect,,an dont blame the correctors of the liesout ancestorshave sent ,,dont blame our queen who gave thealbuin wwoman the datk matter within the womb to produce ur fathers,,skin color iiddnakes skin all are black inside that create life because of our foremuthers before the dar firemothers look up kkk cherokee confederates ,,my family was caprured in north carolina sold into te carribean/atlantis sold to europe ,they was cherokee fulll until they was taken slaves then they was negro ,with no land claim ,birth certificate from hospital killsall lan claoms am birth right claims with euro last name ,,get rid of it off u an ucc-1 it all
skin color id snake skin
So Cagots seem to be the Moors descendants. I would have to say Mulattoes. We have the same issue in the United States. It makes sense that the Moors who ruled Al-Andalus would have mated and have mulattoes descendents. This seem to correlate with the history of the Moors in Europe.